3

Hebrews 9:28, DRB:

So also Christ was offered once to exhaust the sins of many; the second time he shall appear without sin to them that expect him unto salvation.

The phrase he shall appear without sin is ambiguous somehow. Did he appear in the first time with sin?

This phrase appears in some versions clear, but I am not sure if it was a literal translation.

For example:

  • he will appear a second time, not to bear sin, but to bring salvation to those who are waiting for him. NIV.
  • He will come again, not to deal with our sins, but to bring salvation to all who are eagerly waiting for him. NLT.
  • will appear a second time, not to deal with sin but to save those who are eagerly waiting for him. ESV.

And many other translations of clear meaning.

But KJV, ASV and DRB and many other translations who are faithful to the original Greek Text, appear ambiguous somehow.

So what is the most accurate translation?, Could you interpret it to me?

4

The author is alluding to the two comings (advents) of the Messiah. During the first advent, he came as “the lamb of God which takes away the sin of the world.”1 The Lord Jesus Christ was not “without sin” (i.e., he was with sin) during his first advent, although that sin was not his own. Rather, “he bore the sin of many and made intercession for the transgressors.”2 Elsewhere, the apostle Paul wrote,3

21 For He made Him who knew no sin to be sin for us, that we might become the righteousness of God in Him.

For this reason, the author states in the same verse,

28 so Christ was offered once to bear the sins of many. To those who eagerly wait for Him He will appear a second time, apart from sin, for salvation.

During his second advent, he will not come to bear sin. Rather, he will come to “judge the living and the dead at his appearing and his kingdom,”4 in fulfillment of Daniel’s prophecy.5 Hence, the author states that Christ will appear a second time «χωρὶς ἁμαρτίας», “without sin,” that is, not being associated with it (by bearing it).

On the Greek word χωρίς, Thayer wrote,6

Thayer, p. 675, χωρίς, 2


Footnotes

1 John 1:29; cf. 1 Pet. 1:19; Isa. 53
2 Isa. 53:12
3 2 Cor. 5:21
4 2 Tim. 4:1
5 Dan. 7:13–14
6 p. 675

References

Wilke, Christian Gottlob. A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament: Being Grimm Wilke’s Clavis Novi Testamenti. Trans. Thayer, Joseph Henry. Ed. Grimm, Carl Ludwig Wilibald. Rev. ed. New York: American Book, 1889.

| improve this answer | |
  • do you mean by(Christ was not “without sin” during his first advent) that Jesus in first advent was with sin, i.e: was not "without sin"=was with sin?! – salah May 11 at 22:00
  • @DerÜbermensch - Excellent answer. You might also quote 2 Cor 5:21 about the "great divine trade", where Paul says, "God made him who had no sin to be sin for us, so that in him we might become the righteousness of God. (+1) – Dottard May 11 at 22:21
  • @DerÜbermensch thank you for answer and for your comments. – salah May 11 at 22:42
  • @Dottard—How could I forget? Yes, will do. – Der Übermensch May 11 at 22:56

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.