Richard Bauckham observes how John uses certain words and phrases either four times, seven times, or two times, along with certain multiples, such as fourteen and twenty-eight. Gregory K. Beale endorses this and says that "it is improbable that the majority are coincidental because there are so many of these patterns and because these patterns involve the Apocalypse's most crucial theological and anthropological terms.” [The Book of Revelation, NIGTC (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1999), 62] And G. R. Osbome concludes that "there are four major numbers from which the vast majority of numbers derive-4,7,10,12 . . . “ [Revelation] (Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2002), 17]
For example, (and there are many examples!) the phrase "to the one who lives for ever and ever" occurs four times (Revelation 4:9,10; 10:6; 15:7), "the seven spirits" occurs four times (1:4; 3:1; 4:5; 5:6), "I am the Alpha and the Omega," along with its equivalents, "I am the first and the last' and "the beginning and the end," occurs seven times (1:8, 1:17, twice in 21:6, three times in 22:13), and so on.
Academically, some of Bauckman’s hermeneutic claims appear disputed. But I could be persuaded that the fact of the word patterns is deliberate if John had a purpose, such as concealed meaning.
I do not dispute the fact of the patterns. My question is what could be John’s purpose? Does it convey hermeneutic or theological meaning, and if so what is the key to unlock it? How does that work with Revelation 1:3 “Blessed is he who reads aloud…”? Would this have been recognised by the audience of the time, or who was it for?
Background
For: R. Bauckham, The Climax Of Prophecy Studies on the Book of Revelation (Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1993), 30. [Online at the Internet Archive, free registration]
From Revelation 1:3 the book is meant to be heard and interpreted as a spoken piece. And yet, as a composition we know it has dozens of this peculiar literary device. Bauckman did not find evidence of this device elsewhere in OT prophets, in fact he asked for evidence (p37), and so do I.
So my question is not about interpretation of the main text of Revelation. It is supplemental, about why John extensively used this literary device of composition in a spoken piece? And what we are meant to take from it.