1

In 1 Kings 13:32 (NIV) the anonymous prophet speaks in the days of Jeroboam (the first king of the split kingdom of Israel):

For the message he declared by the word of the Lord against the altar in Bethel and against all the shrines on the high places in the towns of Samaria will certainly come true.

However the city of Samaria didn't exist yet since the bible tells us somewhere else (1 Kings 16:24) that Omri is the one who built it and called it "שומרון" (Samaria):

He bought the hill of Samaria from Shemer for two talents[a] of silver and built a city on the hill, calling it Samaria, after Shemer, the name of the former owner of the hill.

So how can the prophet talk about Samaria when it was not yet called like that (and was probably not inhabited either)?

2
  • 1 Kings 16:24 says Omri bought the HILL OF SAMARIA and built the CITY of SAMARIA upon it. The logical conclusion is that the TOWNS OF SAMARIA is a reference to the towns in the vicinity of the HILL OF SAMARIA. There is no contradiction here.
    – enegue
    Commented Nov 1, 2017 at 20:53
  • @enegue why not post it as an answer and ill upvote?
    – bach
    Commented Nov 2, 2017 at 13:52

2 Answers 2

0

According to 1 Kings 16:24, Omri bought the "Hill of Samaria" from Shemer and built the "city of Samaria" at the top. Naming the City after its former owner was likely just giving it the name by which the Hill was already known.

Here is an image of modern day Sebastia, with the Hill of Samaria on its west, rising to a height of around 450m.

enter image description here
Image courtesy of Google Earth. (Dimensions: 1.5km NS; 2km EW; 5km around the base)

enter image description here Google Earth view from the top of the Hill of Samaria looking west towards the Mediterranean.

A description of the city of Sebustieh, as Sebastia was known to Conder and Kitchener in 1882, depicts a region that would have been sought after in all previous generations for its obvious vantage and land quality:

There is a flat plateau on the top, on the east end of which the village stands, the plateau extending westwards for over half a mile. A higher knoll rises from the plateau, west of the village, from which a fine view is obtained as far as the Mediterranean Sea. The whole hill consists of soft soil, and is terraced to the very top.
-- Samaria (BibleWalks.com)

Conclusion
Omri bought the HILL of Samaria and built the CITY of Samaria upon it. The logical conclusion is that the TOWNS of Samaria mentioned by the prophet in 1 Kings 13:32 is a reference to the towns in the vicinity of the HILL of Samaria, not necessarily to those later associated with the CITY of Samaria.

There is no contradiction here.

2

There is no contradiction. A prophet foretold future events.

From Encylopedia Judaica: Samaria -

"Samaria (Heb. Shomron, modern Sebaste) is a city established as the capital of the northern kingdom of Israel during the reign of the Ephraimite ruler Omri c. 884 B.C.E. on a mountain ridge 12 miles northwest of Shechem on the central route from Jerusalem to Galilee. The territory controlled by the city was eventually named for it.

Prior to the Omride period the site appears to have been the center of an extensive wine and oil production area, which may have accounted for its choice as the new capital. Apparently the origin of the name of the site was from Shemer, the eponymous owner of the land that Omri purchased for two talents of silver (I Kings 16:23–24)." Source: here

The scriptures do not say "the city of Samaria", but "the towns of Samaria". The prophet was speaking of a future time in which the entire area formerly called Shemer would become known for the capital city of Samaria which was established for the northern ten tribes of Israel by Omri.

Jeroboam established alternate worship sites in Bethel and in Dan that were idolatrous "high places" where the people worshiped golden calves. See 1 Kings 12:28-30. The old prophet of 1 Kings 13:32 foretold the idolatry that would occur in Bethel and the other high places that would be established by the kings of Israel, but Jeroboam would not listen to the prophet of God.

1 Kings 13:33-24,

"After this thing Jeroboam hath not turned from his evil way, and turneth back, and maketh of the extremities of the people priests of high places; he who is desirous he consecrateth his hand, and he is of the priests of the high places.

34 And in this thing is the sin of the house of Jeroboam, even to cut [it] off, and to destroy [it] from off the face of the ground." (YLT)

Excerpt from Adam Clarke's commentary on vs. 32 & 33:

"Verse 32

In the cities of Samaria - It is most certain that Samaria, or as it is called in Hebrew Shomeron, was not built at this time. We are expressly told that Omri, king of Israel, founded this city on the hill which he bought for two talents of silver, from a person of the name of Shemer, after whom he called the city Samaria or Shomeron; (see 1 Kings 16:24;); and this was fifty years after the death of Jeroboam. How then could the old prophet speak of Samaria, not then in existence, unless he did it by the spirit of prophecy, calling things that are not as though they were; as the man of God called Josiah by name three hundred years before he was born? Some suppose that the historian adds these words because Samaria existed in his time, and he well knew that it did not exist in the time of the old prophet; for himself, in the sixteenth chapter, gives us the account of its foundation by Omri. After all, it is possible that God might have given this revelation to the old prophet; and thus by anticipation which is the language of prophecy, spoke of Samaria as then existing. This is the solution of Houbigant, and is thought sound by many good critics."

"Verse 33

Jeroboam returned not from his evil way - There is something exceedingly obstinate and perverse, as well as blinding and infatuating, in idolatry. The prediction lately delivered at Beth-el, and the miracles wrought in confirmation of it, were surely sufficient to have affected and alarmed any heart, not wholly and incorrigibly hardened; and yet they had no effect on Jeroboam!" Source: here

All bold emphasis is mine.

3
  • (+1) Informative and well supported.
    – Nigel J
    Commented Oct 30, 2017 at 20:35
  • This is hardly an answer. You didn't need to support such an unscholarly approach with sources since this is the first thing that comes to mind. I was obviously looking for something better and more realistic! Why would the prophet use a name unfamiliar to its inhabitants if there was no need for it? the fact is that prophets never do that. Besides there is no evidence that they possessed such knowledge either, as far as we know they were only able to predict and describe future events in their own terminology!
    – bach
    Commented Oct 31, 2017 at 1:27
  • You are only allowing for the knowledge of men, the understanding of men? You are limiting God's prophesy to the contemporary knowledge of a particular man? Why do you discount the knowledge and understanding of the Holy Spirit? The Holy Spirit often revealed things through the prophets that even the prophets did not understand. See Dan. 12:8, 1 Pet. 1:10.
    – Gina
    Commented Oct 31, 2017 at 12:18

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.