10

Genesis 1:26 New International Version

Then God said, "Let us make mankind in our image, in our likeness, so that they may rule over the fish in the sea and the birds in the sky, over the livestock and all the wild animals, and over all the creatures that move along the ground."

What's the difference between image and likeness?

5
  • 1
    +1 Good question. Tselem (image) is used, also, of the images of idols. Demuth (likeness) is largely used in relation to God, by Isaiah, and in relation to cherubim, by Ezekiel.
    – Nigel J
    Commented Aug 11, 2020 at 12:59
  • Thanks Nigel. For years I just read them as synonyms.
    – user35953
    Commented Aug 11, 2020 at 13:12
  • I am hoping someone will enlighten us. As yourself, I have just read and not understood. I've looked at Young's Concordance today but scanning the word-usage in scripture hasn't revealed anything to me. My initial thought is that 'image' refers to the appearance and 'likeness' would be more - the manner, the behaviour. But I am guessing, so cannot post a real answer.
    – Nigel J
    Commented Aug 11, 2020 at 13:19
  • hermeneutics.stackexchange.com/questions/585/…
    – user35953
    Commented Aug 11, 2020 at 15:28
  • In addition to Genesis 1:26, you could have piggybacked on the issue of the two aspects of Jesus spoken of in Philippians Chapter 2, where the words likeness, appearance, and nature are used in different ways to describe the God-Man, Jesus Christ. Just a thought . . .. Commented Aug 13, 2020 at 14:45

9 Answers 9

4

The word image in the Hebrew בצלמנו in v26 speaks of being a representative form, like a shadow. It takes on the form of the original and is intended to imitate the original.

In all instances that the word tselem is used, its always a representation of another. The vast majority of the times unfortunately it is an inanimate object (idol) representing a deity, unlike the case of Adam who is a living image(r) with responsibilities.

The LXX in this verse uses the Greek word εἰκών for image and the word can be understood to mean a copy. God made a copy of Himself in Adam.

For the law having a shadow of good things to come, and not the very image of the things, can never with those sacrifices which they offered year by year continually make the comers thereunto perfect. Heb10:1

This verse seems to indicate in the NT Greek usage of the word that the image is a good copy or a good representation of the original unlike a shadow which is too vague.

Its followed by the word translated likeness כדמותנו to further explain and build on the idea that it’s about being similar to God.

This word demure means, similar or like but not the same as, in all other instances it is referenced in the OT

It would at first impression appear that this is referencing the physical appearance and this might include the physical appearance yet is not limited only to appearance but it especially means to be a representative in likeness to God. A copy of God on earth. (This only makes the nachash’s offer to Eve all the more enticing, don’t just be a copy of God but be a god in your own right).

However the Hebrew continues to speak of dominion וירדו and if one were to take the translation punctuations out, one could read the text as saying something to the effect, ’let us make man in our image and likeness with dominion over the earth‘

In which case the emphasis doesn’t fall so much on the exterior appearance but the position of authority. Man was intended to govern on the earth as God governs in the heavens.

Man is the imager of God, like a representative or in modern language like an ambassador of God on the earth, exercising dominion over the realm below the firmament

5
  • (+1) Some really helpful analysis here, including an explanation of why the Greek terms are not the best starting point for analysing this. I suspect you're on to something big by naming the link to idolatry with image - there could be more under that rock to explain why these terms may have been used in combination in this passage for the original audience.
    – Steve can help
    Commented Sep 9, 2021 at 5:21
  • In Genesis 5:3, God declares that he gave Man the same capacity he possessed, i.e. to create children "(בִּדְמוּת֖וֹ) in his likeness, (כְּצַלְמ֑וֹ) after his image...". However, the order of the words 'likeness' and 'image' is flipped. Do you see any significance in this regarding the meaning of the words, or is it just incidental?
    – enegue
    Commented Dec 9 at 22:36
  • @enegue I have never considered this. I’ll have to get back to you if I find anything significant Commented Dec 9 at 23:56
  • 1
    @NihilSineDeo Thanks.
    – enegue
    Commented Dec 10 at 0:08
  • 1
    @enegue I would venture to say that Seth according to Adam was most like himself in appearance hence why his appearance is emphasized first. Whereas with man/Adam, man is most like God in his representation, certainly true in the pre-fallen state and God emphasizes this quality over the superficial likeness/similarity whereas in Seth’s case it seemed best for Adam to focus on what he saw, the superficial, and because representing him would follow in the future being an imager was not primary on Adam’s mind. Carnal man first sees/judges skin deep and then sees potential of character afterwards. Commented Dec 10 at 4:38
2

My understanding of the difference is the following:

Image of God: These are the parts that make up a human being that is different from any other living thing: Body, Soul, and Spirit.

Body: We were formed from the dust of the earth that was later cursed through sin. Adam and Eve ate the fruit that became part of her body and corrupted it. This part of Human beings will be changed into the incorruptible before entering heaven. However, the body is still important 1 Cor 6:19 “Or do you not know that your body is a temple for the Ruach HaKodesch (Holy Spirit) who lives inside of you, whom you received from God?” You do not belong to yourselves; for you were bought at a price. So use your bodies to glorify God.” Rom 12:1-2 “I beseech you therefore, brethren, by the mercies of God, that you present your bodies as a living sacrifice, holy, acceptable to God, which is your reasonable service and do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.”

Soul: A soul is having a Mind, a Will, Feelings, Morality, and Purposes. God gave Adam and Eve free choice and He had a purpose for them to rule the earth and have fellowship with them, His first Covenant. This is the area that satan targeted in the Garden of Eden. He challenged Eve’s mind and her will. Gen. 3:5 “God knows that on the day you eat from it your eyes will be opened and you will be like God knowing good and evil.” Tempting humans with knowledge of his evil. “v6: the tree was desirable for making one wise, she took from its fruit and ate”. They already knew good as God was good and they were living in His garden, having fellowship with Him. They emotionally reacted (had shame) and the purpose that was given to them was cursed (rulership, bearing children, cultivating the earth). Their morality was affected as they gave in to lies and blame-shifting. Their disobedience brought death to the earth. Adam and Eve were expelled from the garden. To prevent humanity from accessing the Tree of Life and living in their sin forever (God still showed grace), God stationed “cherubim and a flaming sword flashing back and forth to guard the way to the tree of life” (Genesis 3:24). God also gave the promise of a redeemer through Adam and Eve’s descendants. Jesus warned that Human beings should guard their soul of temptations. “Matthew 10:28 - And fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear him which is able to destroy both soul and body in hell.” Matthew 16:26 - For what is a man profited, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul? or what shall a man give in exchange for his soul?”

Spirit is what was breathed into man by God. Genesis 2:7 “God formed Adam from the dust of the ground and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, so that he became a living being.” 1 Corinthians 15:45 “So also it is written, The first man, Adam, became a living soul (human being). The last Adam (Yeshua) became a life-giving spirit.” The Spirit is the essence of life which belongs to God and will return to God when we die. Jesus gave up His “spirit” on the cross Luke 23:46.

Likeness of God: This refers to a state of being (represented in manner/behaviour), not to be confused with attributes that only God can possess (omnipresence, omnipotence, etc.). To know the likeness of God we look to Yeshua (Jesus) and the Holy Spirit (Ruach HaKodesch) as examples. The indwelling of the Holy Spirit gives humans God’s manner/behaviour... His likeness Galatians 5:22-23 “But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness and self-control.” Jesus exemplified these behaviours. Adam and Eve gave up their self-control and were rebellious (opposite of faithfulness) and pursued the knowledge of evil (opposite of goodness) and therefore corrupted the likeness of God in themselves.

1

In the Insight on the Scriptures (published by the Watchtower Society), the article on the word Image says the following:

Whereas references to images in the Bible frequently relate to idolatry, this is not always the case. God, in creating man, said first, “Let us make man in our image [or, shadow, semblance], according to our likeness.” (Ge 1:26, 27, ftn) Since God’s Son stated that his Father is “a Spirit,” this rules out any physical likeness between God and man. (Joh 4:24) Rather, man has qualities reflecting, or mirroring, those of his heavenly Maker, qualities that positively distinguish man from the animal creation. (See ADAM No. 1.) Though in the image of his Creator, man was not made to be an object of worship, or veneration.

Even as Adam’s own son Seth (born to him in his imperfection, however) was in Adam’s “likeness, in his image” (Ge 5:3), Adam’s likeness to God originally identified him as God’s earthly son. (Lu 3:38) Despite man’s fall to imperfection, the fact of mankind’s originally having been made in God’s image was cited after the Noachian Flood as the basis for the divine law authorizing humans to serve as executioners in putting murderers to death. (Ge 9:5, 6; see AVENGER OF BLOOD.) In Christian instructions concerning feminine head covering, Christian men were told they ought not to wear such a covering, since the man “is God’s image and glory,” while the woman is man’s glory.​—1Co 11:7.

Ellicott's Commentary for English Readers under Genesis 1:26, gives us similar insight:

In our image, after our likeness.—The human body is after God’s image only as being the means whereby man attains to dominion: for dominion is God’s attribute, inasmuch as He is sole Lord. Man’s body, therefore, as that of one who rules, is erect, and endowed with speech, that he may give the word of command. The soul is first, in God’s image. This, as suggesting an external likeness, may refer to man’s reason, free-will, self-consciousness, and so on. But it is, secondly, in God’s likeness, which implies something closer and more inward. It refers to man’s moral powers, and especially to his capacity of attaining unto holiness. Now man has lost neither of these two. (Comp. Genesis 9:6; 1Corinthians 11:7; James 3:9.) Both were weakened and defiled by the fall, but were still retained in a greater or less degree. In the man Christ Jesus both were perfect; and fallen man, when new-created in Christ, attains actually to that perfection which was his only potentially at his first creation, and to which Adam never did attain.

So being made in God's image and/or likeness is to be understood as having similar qualities and capacities as the Creator, but not to the same degree.

Man's likeness to God can also be seen in his governance over the earth as is illustrated in the Awake! December '88 article What Does Genesis Really Say?

Another description of the creation of man is found at Genesis 1:26. There God says: “Let us make man in our image, according to our likeness, and let them have in subjection the fish of the sea and the flying creatures of the heavens and the domestic animals and all the earth and every moving animal that is moving upon the earth.” (Genesis 1:26) Since the Bible tells us that God is a spirit, the phrase “in our image” must be understood to mean possessing God’s qualities.

This statement explains, in a way that evolution never could, why man is so different from the animals. Only man can control the animals and the vegetation around him. Only man has a moral sense and a conscience. Only man has a wide freedom of choice and such a developed intelligence. Only man has the ability to conceive of the existence of God and the gift of speech with which to speak to Him. The Journal of Semitic Studies says: “Human speech is a secret; it is a divine gift.”

1

What's the difference between image and likeness?

As Nihil Sine Deo discussed, image and likeness are similar but carry slightly different connotations:

An Image carries with it the idea of the representative or stand-in function of the one so designated and relates more to one's role than to one's appearance. For an image or idol, it was more important what it represented than what it looked like.

Likeness relates more to the visual appearance.

The immediate context of image and likeness found in Genesis 1:26 relates to man's rule over the creatures in the earth, sky, and sea.

Therefore, Man's designated role in creation is to function as God's images - God's ruling representatives on earth.
To the extent that we obediently and faithfully represent God, when we are looked upon, God's likeness - God's wise and righteous rule in our lives - can be seen and should be apparent to all.


Bonus answer to a question you didn't ask:
This is what was meant by Jesus, the image of God, when he said, "The one having seen Me has seen the Father." When we look upon Jesus, God's ultimate obedient and faithful representative, we see the likeness of the Father in the son's lived wisdom and righteousness and love.

Bonus answer to a second question you'd didn't ask:
Understanding the image of God as a role or office designated to the created class of human beings helps us to resolve issues presented by viewing the image of God as defined by a particular set of attributes like intelligence and decision making.

For example:
What about humans who aren't particularly intelligent or are not able to make decisions?
(like babies or the mentally impaired)

Can they be considered to not be God's images since they don't have these attributes?

If they lack these attributes are they no longer protected by God's command to Noah that, “Whoever sheds the blood of man, by man shall his blood be shed, for God made man in his own image" (Gen 9:6)?

Are we free to shed the blood of sub-images who lack these attributes?

Well, of course not. The entire human class has been created in the office of the image of God. It doesn't matter how broken we are or how good of a job we do. We are God's images as a matter of creation, and for that reason alone we all deserve dignity.

0

The Hebrew meaning of Our Image & Likeness to Elohim:

In Bereishit (Genesis) 1:26, we read "In Our Image, after Our Likeness" (בְּצַלְמֵ֖נוּ כִּדְמוּתֵ֑נוּ ).

In the Hebrew, we see the word "Tsalem" ( צַלְמֵ֖) traditionally translated as "Image" in English. Then we see the suffix "Nu" (נוּ ) = "Our" in English. - Next we read the phrase "Ki-Demut-Nu" ( כִּדְמוּתֵ֑נוּ) literally translated "Like - Appearance - Our".

Interesting to note the English word "Demure" regarding feminine qualities is similar to the Hebrew word "Demut" ( דְמוּתֵ֑).

However we see "Ki-Demut" ( כִּדְמוּת֙) used later in the Tanakh to describe the "appearance of a son of Adam" ( כִּדְמוּת֙ בְּנֵ֣י אָדָ֔ם) in Daniel 10:16.

Regarding Bereishit (Genesis) 1:26, The "Adam" ( אָדָ֛ם) or Human Image (צַלְמֵ֖ ) is first modeled like the feminine "Demut" likeness of Elohim which supports modern Geneticists discovery that a Y (Yod) chromosome is required to form a female zygote into a male embryo. - [Genesis 1:26] deals with conception before [Genesis 2:7] deals with development of the man and woman.

5
  • 1
    Thats pretty good. I think man was created on the 6th day but woman on the 7th day. Mmmmm...
    – R. Emery
    Commented Aug 11, 2020 at 13:36
  • And I think gen 6 originally followed gen 1
    – R. Emery
    Commented Aug 11, 2020 at 13:37
  • [Genesis 1:26] deals with conception before [Genesis 2:7] deals with development of the man and woman. Commented Aug 11, 2020 at 14:01
  • 2
    You seem to be saying that 'image' is 'appearance' and 'likeness' is 'behaviour'. Are you able to supply links to substantiate what you are asserting ?
    – Nigel J
    Commented Aug 11, 2020 at 14:05
  • @Nigel J // However we see "Ki-Demut" ( כִּדְמוּת֙) used later in the Tanakh to describe the "appearance of a son of Adam" ( כִּדְמוּת֙ בְּנֵ֣י אָדָ֔ם) in Daniel 10:16. - so we can validate Appearance instead of Behavior as an accurate Hebrew meaning. Commented Aug 11, 2020 at 14:46
0

I would try to exegete this with regard to St. Maximos distinction between "image" for man as genera, ie. ousia and "likeness" for man as specifica, ie. hypostasis. I think hebrew grammar would allow for a reading of כדמותנו as כ (time particle) + דמה (verb participle passive) + נו (Pers.-suff. 1.pl.) in order for the whole sentence to mean (speaking in philosophical terms): God has created man being in potentia able to participate in His essence as he as individual in actuality is reflected over time against His essence.

1
  • Welcome to Biblical Hermeneutics.SE and thank you for your contribution. When you get a chance, please take the tour to understand how the site works and how it is different than others. I also recommend going through the Help Center's sections on both asking and answering questions.
    – agarza
    Commented Apr 28, 2023 at 0:02
0

I find the image/likeness comments quite fascinating, and my view is that God created us in his image, and the possibility of his likeness. Meaning the image was given but the likeness must be validated. God determined our image, we had nothing to do with that part, but the likeness is determined by how well we represent God through our mannerism.
Just as we have been granted the possibility to enter His heaven, but the probability is predicated upon our obedience.

2
  • Welcome to Biblical Hermeneutics! and thank you for your contribution. When you get a chance, please take the tour to understand how the site works and how it is different than others. I also recommend going through the Help Center's sections on both asking and answering questions.
    – agarza
    Commented Oct 15, 2023 at 13:41
  • Your answer could be improved with additional supporting information. Please edit to add further details, such as citations or documentation, so that others can confirm that your answer is correct. You can find more information on how to write good answers in the help center.
    – Community Bot
    Commented Oct 15, 2023 at 13:41
0

Image - comparable to the pre-incarnate Christ found in the Old Testament (Christophany as in the Lord that appeared to Abraham just before the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah) and the incarnate Christ in the New Testament, an image not like a flower or an animal but born of a virgin and becoming a man.

Likeness - like God‘s Triune nature, just as Colossians 2:9 states: For in Him (Jesus) dwells all the fullness of the Godhead bodily; The “likeness” of the Triune Godhead dwells in man. The three likenesses of the Godhead or Trinity dwelling in man are:

  1. Man’s mind - The center of all his knowledge which is ever increasing versus the mind of the all-knowing, omniscient Father
  2. Man’s body - The power he possesses to perform his physical tasks versus the body of Jesus Christ with his unlimited omnipotent power to perform whatever the Father requires of him
  3. Man’s voice - That which man uses to both communicate his thoughts to those around him or beyond his immediate location as far as his voice will travel, versus The Voice of God, His Holy voice or Spirit that he uses to communicate his thoughts and directions anywhere he desires individually, or corporately to all places, His voice is omnipresent
1
  • 1
    Your answer could be improved with additional supporting information. Please edit to add further details, such as citations or documentation, so that others can confirm that your answer is correct. You can find more information on how to write good answers in the help center.
    – Community Bot
    Commented Nov 13, 2023 at 5:05
-1

The words image and likeness are not synonymous terms as theologians who deny God has form against the Scriptures insist. The image has to do with God's Superhuman body, that our physical bodies are patterned after. And the likeness has to do with God's Superhuman Spirit that our human spirits are patterned after. Theologians who are simple simply tell us that the words image and likeness mean the same thing to defend their humanistic doctrine that the essence of God is Spirit John 4:24.

But the emphasis in John chapter 24 is not on the essence of God, but on how we are to worship God "in spirit and in truth. We all know that our human spirits are immaterial and that they are patterned after God's Spirit, which is what the word likeness in Gen.1:26 refers to. But where in the context do we find what the word image refers to? The answer is in Gen. 2:7 in which we find the Lord God fashioning Adam's body which is patterned after God's image (tselem). The theologians and commentators don't mention this fact, which accounts for the word image. Our bodies which theologians do not make allowances for in Gen. 1:26-27, have to be accounted for which Gen.2:7 does. Even Jesus who scholarship are ignorantly making a liar of said "Blessed are the pure in heart for they shall see God."

I am going to show in my second and upcoming book that the Divine Trinity has always had Superhuman form, both Body and Spirit in my book titled "Genesis chapters 1-3" by Joel Hernandez. And that the theologians and commentators are not letting the Scriptures speak for themselves. I have written a commentary titled "The Two Witnesses are God the Father and God the Holy Spirit" by Joel Hernandez Covenant Book Publishing. And have a personal library of over 5,000 books on theology, and have studied the Scriptures for 45 years.

1
  • Welcome to Biblical Hermeneutics! and thank you for your contribution. When you get a chance, please take the tour to understand how the site works and how it is different than others. I also recommend going through the Help Center's sections on both asking and answering questions.
    – agarza
    Commented Sep 10, 2023 at 0:36

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.