Does this make sense to anybody??? The 40 and the 70 are not related but both apply:
Forty Years in Babylon
5 For I have laid on you the years of their iniquity, according to the number of the days, three hundred and ninety days; so, you shall bear the iniquity of the house of Israel. 6 And when you have completed them, lie again on your right side; then you shall bear the iniquity of the house of Judah forty days. I have laid on you a day for each year. (Ezekiel 4:5-6)
390 days to bear the iniquity of Israel (corporately)
40 days to bear the iniquity of Judah
430 total captivity days to bear the iniquity for the 12 tribes of Israel (Solomon’s reign began around 969BC and Cyrus released the Jews around 539 BC = 430BC)
40 years for Judah’s iniquity = 601 BC– 561 BC (Jehoiachin, aka Jeconiah or Coniah, was released after 40 years when Nebuchadnezzar died. Why is this significant? Let’s read Jeremiah’s prophecy in Jeremiah 22:24-30.
“As I live,” says the LORD, “though Coniah (Jehoiachin, Jeconiah) the son of Jehoiakim, king of Judah, were the signet on My right hand, yet I would pluck you off; and I will give you into the hand of those who seek your life, and into the hand of those whose face you fear—the hand of Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon and the hand of the Chaldeans. So I will cast you out, and your mother who bore you, into another country where you were not born; and there you shall die. But to the land to which they desire to return, there they shall not return.
“Is this man Coniah a despised, broken idol—A vessel in which is no pleasure? Why are they cast out, he and his descendants, and cast into a land which they do not know? O earth, earth, earth, hear the word of the Lord! Thus says the Lord: ‘Write this man down as childless, a man who shall not prosper in his days; For none of his descendants shall prosper, sitting on the throne of David, and ruling anymore in Judah.’ ”
This is a very significant prophesy because:
- The Lord declared that none of Jehoiachin’s seven sons would rule as a direct descendant of David, thus interrupting the promise made to David to establish his throne forever in 2 Samuel 7:16. Indeed, Jehoiachin’s descendants did not reign at all. They were “cast out.” Jehoiachin was the last of David’s descendants to reign until Christ. Zedekiah, the uncle of Jehoiachin, was appointed by Nebuchadnezzar when Jehoiachin was taken to Babylon but was not in the kingly lineage.
Warren Wiersbe comments in Be Decisive, “Jehoiachin had at least seven children (1 Chron. 3:17–18) by several wives (2 Kings 24:15), but none of them would sit on the throne of David. God declared that He would treat Jehoiachin as if the man were childless. Zedekiah, the last king of Judah, saw the Babylonians slay his sons, and it’s likely that he himself died before Jehoiachin was freed from prison (Jer. 52:10–11, 31–34). This means that Jehoiachin was the last surviving king in David’s line.
“Of course, Jesus Christ is the “son of David” (Matt. 1:1; Rom. 1:3) and one day will restore the fortunes of Israel and reign from David’s throne (Luke 1:30–33, 67–79). The genealogy in Matthew 1 traces Christ’s ancestry through His legal father Joseph. Since Jehoiachin is in that family tree (Matt. 1:11), however, none of his descendants can claim the throne because of the curse pronounced in Jeremiah 22:24–30. Our Lord gets His Davidic throne rights through His mother Mary, whose genealogy is given in Luke 3:21–38. From Abraham to David, the lists are similar, but from David on, they differ. Luke traced the line through David’s son Nathan and thus avoided Jehoiachin, a descendant of Solomon. Jesus Christ has every right to David’s throne….
- The 40 years of captivity began in 601BC when Nebuchadnezzar’s forces came into the region, and the captivity ended in 561 BC when Nebuchadnezzar died. God had said that Nebuchadnezzar was His chosen “servant” to carry out Israel’s discipline (Jeremiah 25:8-9).
Seventy Years in Babylon
And those who escaped from the sword he carried away to Babylon, where they became servants to him and his sons until the rule of the kingdom of Persia, to fulfill the word of the LORD by the mouth of Jeremiah, until the land had enjoyed her Sabbaths. As long as she lay desolate she kept Sabbath, to fulfill seventy years. (2 Chronicles 36:20-21)
And this whole land shall be a desolation and an astonishment, and these nations shall serve the king of Babylon seventy years. ‘Then it will come to pass, when seventy years are completed, that I will punish the king of Babylon and that nation, the land of the Chaldeans, for their iniquity,’ says the LORD; ‘and I will make it a perpetual desolation. (Jeremiah 25:11-12)
For thus says the LORD: After seventy years are completed at Babylon, I will visit you and perform My good word toward you, and cause you to return to this place. (Jeremiah 29:10)
I will scatter you among the nations and draw out a sword after you; your land shall be desolate and your cities waste. Then the land shall enjoy its sabbaths as long as it lies desolate and you are in your enemies’ land; then the land shall rest and enjoy its sabbaths. As long as it lies desolate it shall rest—for the time it did not rest on your sabbaths when you dwelt in it. (Leviticus 26:33-35)
Near View: In the first year of Darius the son of Ahasuerus, of the lineage of the Medes, who was made king over the realm of the Chaldeans— in the first year of his reign I, Daniel, understood by the books the number of the years specified by the word of the LORD through Jeremiah the prophet, that He would accomplish seventy years in the desolations of Jerusalem. (Daniel 9:1-2)
Far View: “Seventy weeks are determined for your people and for your holy city, to finish the transgression, to make an end of sins, to make reconciliation for iniquity, to bring in everlasting righteousness, to seal up vision and prophecy, and to anoint the Most Holy. (Daniel 9:24)
Q: If Jeremiah’s first letter sent to Babylon was received in 596BC and if Ezekiel’s ministry began in 593 when he was 30 years old, then Ezekiel and all the captives knew of the 70-year prediction. Why don’t we see any references to the 70 years?