2

We read in Jn 19:23-24 (KJV):

Then the soldiers, when they had crucified Jesus, took his garments, and made four parts, to every soldier a part; and also his coat: now the coat was without seam, woven from the top throughout. They said therefore among themselves, Let us not rend it, but cast lots for it, whose it shall be..

Jesus was clothed befitting the Passover when he got arrested and was put on trial. It appears that the clothing ( comprising of say, five pieces) other than the piece he was made to wear on the way to Calvary (Mk 15:20), was carried by someone to the cross. The soldiers , four in number, divided it among themselves rather than hand it over to his kith and kin after the crucifixion. The coat perhaps was to be torn into pieces and taken as trophy by the executioners. But having found it a wonderful piece of work, they opted to cast the lot, to decide on the lucky winner.

Now, if the coat was ordinary and made of joined parts ( Elsewhere, Jesus refers to the foolish work of joining old and new pieces of cloth. See Mk 2:21 ) , there again they would perhaps decide that one soldier claims the full piece. One is therefore, inclined to conclude that there is a deeper significance for John the Evangelist's statement that Jesus' coat was without seam.What do scholars say about such a perspective ?

4
  • 1
    That the coat had no seams makes the coat special, and could be a way to connect Jesus' coat with another special coat in the Bible, namely Joseph's multicolored coat. Meaning that Jesus is the savior, not just for the Jews, but for all people on earth. Commented Mar 2 at 10:53
  • Constantthin, could you please cite the reference for Joseph's multicolored coat ? Commented Mar 3 at 6:59
  • It is mentioned three times in Genesis 37. Commented Mar 3 at 8:11
  • I've often thought it signified two things: 1. it was of considerable worth (maybe not a Kiton suit, but a garment of significant worth nonetheless); 2. Identified as a Priest (and therefore, the garment signified a mediatorial role). These are in contrast, here at his death, to his birth. His birth was characterized as him being born in a cleaned out livestock pen and laid in a feed trough. Born as lowly; died as Mediator. Commented Sep 5 at 16:53

2 Answers 2

1

Indivisibility of Christ’s Church:

Cyprian of Carthage, in his work De Unitate, notes that the seamless tunic represents the indivisibility of Christ’s Church. Just as the coat is woven in one piece without seams, the Church is intended to be one, undivided body.

(Cyprian of Carthage, De Unitate, 7)

When someone would be clothed with Christ, he receives a perfect suit of clothing, and an undamaged tunic. But what comes into his possession is common property… Christ was wearing the unity that proceeds ‘from the upper part’ (that means ‘proceeding from heaven and from the Father’), which could never at all be torn apart by him who receives and possesses it, but rather with it secures for himself something that has a firm integrity. He who rends and splits Christ’s Church cannot possess Christ’s robe …

So truly because Christ’s people cannot be torn apart, his tunic, ‘woven without seam,’ and holding fast together, has not become divided amongst its owners. The description ‘unable to be split (united, linked together),’ reveals the concord that holds together the unity of our people who have put on Christ. By the sign and seal of the tunic Christ has declared the unity of his Church.


Yet again we will see it compared to the unity and indivisibility of the Church mirroring the seamless nature of Jesus’ teachings, which has perfect harmony, without divisions or stitches.

The seamless coat is a looking glass into Jesus’ pure, his perfect, and his integrated character. The seamless garment may also be seen as a symbol of Jesus’ kingship. In ancient times, these types of garments were often associated with royalty or high-ranking officials.

Unity of the Church, Jesus' perfect teachings and character, Jesus’ kingship:

christianpure says it well:

...For many, it symbolizes the unity and indivisibility of the Church. As the robe was woven in one piece without seams, so too is the Church intended to be one, undivided body...

...It mirrors the unity of Jesus' teachings, seamless from top to bottom, without divisions or stitches, just like the robe. This symbolizes the interconnectedness of Christian doctrine, where each part works together to create a harmonious whole.

You might also see it as a reflection of Jesus' pure, perfect, and integrated character. In cultural interpretations, it's seen as a symbol of Jesus Christ as the great High Priest, embodying his divine authority and sanctity.

Additionally, the seamless robe can be seen as a symbol of Jesus's kingship. In ancient times, a seamless garment was often associated with royalty or high-ranking officials. By wearing such a garment, Jesus could be seen as subtly asserting his divine authority.


Jesus’ role as the High Priest:

Some see the seamless coat as a symbol of Jesus’ role as the High Priest. In the Old Testament, the high priest wore a seamless garment. Jesus wore a similar garment. The idea is that Jesus is seen as fulfilling the role of the ultimate High Priest who offers Himself as a sacrifice for humanity.

It certainly was a unique garment, because the tunic worn daily by men and women in Palestine was not seamless but made of two pieces of fabric sown together. (stpaulcenter.com)

I think we can also see it symbolizing Jesus’ priesthood, the transfiguration of the Levitical priesthood. Admittedly, this is not without difficulties because of the word chitōn (χιτών), which John uses in 19:23 to describe Jesus’ garment. The high priest wore two full length garments, the tunic/ undergarment worn by all priests and, additionally, his priestly robe (or the ephod). Chitōn is the word in the Greek Old Testament for the tunic/undergarment worn by all priests, while a different word, hypodytēs (ὑποδύτης), is usually the word for the priestly robe. However, I believe there are possible ways around this difficulty. (stpaulcenter.com)

Pulpit Commentary

Now the coat was without seam from the top - from the upper portions - woven throughout (δι ὅλου, an adverbial form) - woven, possibly, by the mother who loved him, and corresponding with the dress of the priests. Keim and Thorns see here "a symbolizing of Jesus as the High Priest" (see Holman Hunt's celebrated picture the "Light of the World"). Certainly John saw the Lord in his glory with a garment of the kind (woven of radiant light, and reaching to the feet, Revelation 1.). The unity of the Savior's seamless vesture has been variously treated in patristic literature: as symbolic of the unity of natures in his Person, by the Monephysites; and by Cyprian ('De Unitate Ecclesiae,' § 7) in his conflict with Novatianists, as symbolic of the unity of the Church, and he actually builds on it his dictum, "He cannot possess the garment of Christ who parts and divides the Church of Christ." This garment could not be conveniently divided. John 19:23


Further insights: About the tunic and how it was made:

Ellicott's Commentary for English Readers

More exactly, the tunic, or under-garment. It reached from the neck to the feet, while the outer “garment” was a square rug thrown round the body. Ordinarily the tunic consisted of two pieces connected at the shoulder by clasps; but that worn by Jesus was made in one piece. This seems to have been the rule with the priestly tunics.

Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Bible Commentary

without seam, woven from the top throughout—"perhaps denoting considerable skill and labor as necessary to produce such a garment, the work probably of one or more of the women who ministered in such things unto Him

1
  • Since this question has come up again, I have edited my answer a bit.
    – Jason_
    Commented Sep 5 at 19:20
0

Psalm 22 is considered messianic prophecy, famously beginning with: "My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?", which would later be said by Jesus shortly before his death.

Among other things, it also contains what could be a description of Jesus's execution:

16 For dogs have compassed me: the assembly of the wicked have inclosed me: they pierced my hands and my feet. 17 I may tell all my bones: they look and stare upon me. 18 They part my garments among them, and cast lots upon my vesture.

It's not surprising then that any gambling over clothing would be included in all four Gospel accounts of the Crucifixion.


The question here is "What is the deeper significance of the seamless coat of Jesus?".

Perhaps a mundane answer is the reality: Jesus happened to be wearing his "Sunday best" (perhaps anticipating his appearance before King Herod) and the soldiers were smart enough to realize that splitting the material among themselves would destroy most of its value.

There is no deeper significance, the question itself simply being an example of Proportionality bias:

also known as major event/major cause heuristic, is the tendency to assume that big events have big causes. It is a type of cognitive bias and plays an important role in people's tendency to accept conspiracy theories. Academic psychologist Rob Brotherton summarises it as "When something big happens, we tend to assume that something big must have caused it".

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.