1

John 1:3, "All things came into being by/through Him, and apart, (or without) Him nothing came into being that has come into being."

Colossians 1:16, "For (or because) by Him all things were created, both in the heavens and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or rulers or authorities--all things have been created by/through Him and for Him."

If Jesus is the firstborn of all creation or first created, how can it be said, "All things came into being by Him and without this created creature nothing came into being that has come into being?" Is it reasonable to conclude that God could not do His job of creating without Jesus being there?

1

1 Answer 1

3

The contention stems from the word "Firstborn". Firstborn (the ancient Greek word prototokos) can describe either:

  1. Priority in time
  2. Supremacy in rank

The Greek word prototokos, which is translated as firstborn, can refer to different things. It could refer either to something or someone that is first in order of time, such as a firstborn child, or it could refer to someone who is preeminent in rank. Or it could refer to someone who was both firstborn and preeminent in rank. It all depends upon the context. (Blueletterbible)

As Paul used it here, he probably had both ideas in mind, with Jesus being before all created things and Jesus being of a supremely different order than all created things. (Enduring Word Commentary)

The term “firstborn” in this context is interpreted not as Jesus being the first created being, but rather as a title of honor and authority, signifying His preeminence over all creation.

First born doesn't have to mean literally "birthed first".

Take for example Revelation 1:5.

and from Jesus Christ, the faithful witness, the firstborn from the dead, and the ruler over the kings of the earth.

To Him who loved us and washed us from our sins in His own blood,

The psalmist gives a description of David as being the firstborn. The Lord said of him.

Also I will make him My firstborn, The highest of the kings of the earth. (Psalm 89:27).

The title “firstborn” does not imply that Jesus is inferior to God.

In no way does the title firstborn indicate that Jesus is less than God. In fact, the ancient Rabbis called Yahweh Himself “Firstborn of the World” (Rabbi Bechai, cited in Lightfoot). Ancient rabbis used firstborn as a Messianic title: “God said, As I made Jacob a first-born (Exodus 4:22), so also will I make king Messiah a first-born (Psalm 89:27).” (R. Nathan in Shemoth Rabba, cited in Lightfoot) (Enduring Word Commentary)

Paul’s use of the word carries a comparative or superlative meaning, indicating Christ’s supremacy or preeminence rather than his creation.

“The use of this word does not show what Arius argued: that Paul regarded Christ as a creature like ‘all creation’… It is rather the comparative (superlative) force of protos that is used.” (Robertson) (Enduring Word Commentary)


Colossians 1:15 describes Jesus as the “firstborn of all creation,” which can be reconciled with Colossians 1:16 and John 1:3 by understanding “firstborn” as a title of rank and authority, rather than implying that Jesus is a created being.

“all things were created through Him,” indicates Jesus’ involvement in creation. Similarly, John 1:3 says “All things were made through Him, and without Him nothing was made that was made,” reinforcing the idea that Jesus is not part of creation but the means by which everything was created.

3
  • 1
    +1. Good answer.
    – Dottard
    Commented Aug 11 at 21:48
  • @Dottard Thank you. I appreciate it! It’s always nice to get positive feedback.
    – Jason_
    Commented Aug 11 at 21:55
  • You have not noticed that the only two times tokos is used in scripture it is a matter of 'usury'. Thus prototokos is the first instalment of an investment. Thus God's 'investment' of the first creation and all that that entails, finds its first 'return on investment' in the One who is called Prototokos - the One who heralds a New Creation through redemption, remission, justification, reconciliation and an everlasting testament. But up-voted, nevertheless +1.
    – Nigel J
    Commented Aug 11 at 22:18

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.