Skip to main content
11 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jan 16 at 22:23 answer added Kristian Pearson timeline score: 0
Jul 2, 2021 at 14:05 comment added Olde English There are 3 'entities' here, for sure, being referenced: God and his only begotten son being the more obvious. The 3rd entity is the spirit (pneuma), where some are sufficiently/obligedly 'opinionated' to capitalize the first letter. The word 'pneuma' is a noun, nominative, neuter, singular. Whether it is a proper noun, or just a regular noun is therefore a matter of opinion. The word can also mean 'breath', as in breath of God, or Jesus, or 'active force' of same, it cannot therefore be 'definitively' personal and there we have the 'facts' of the matter. The A. can therefore be exegetic.
Jul 2, 2021 at 6:00 comment added Steve can help @Dottard - to me, its an anachronism, similar to if we asked whether the verse is about Maslo's hierarchy of needs. Accurate or not, the Trinity is not a concept known In the Apostolic age
Jul 1, 2021 at 2:21 comment added Dottard As usual, I am at a loss to know why some downvote such a valid question!! I presume that some have such mental conniption about anything that even mentions the trinity that their automatic response is a downvote.
Jun 30, 2021 at 22:41 review Close votes
Jul 5, 2021 at 10:28
Apr 17, 2021 at 14:55 history became hot network question
Apr 17, 2021 at 10:36 comment added curiousdannii I think this question is on-topic, though I'm not sure there's really a lot to say exegetically about verses such at this. I wouldn't want questions like this asked for every similar verse. Ultimately we each have to decide for ourselves what we think the weight of biblical evidence shows.
Apr 17, 2021 at 8:54 vote accept CommunityBot
Apr 17, 2021 at 7:41 answer added Dottard timeline score: 3
Apr 17, 2021 at 7:29 answer added Craig timeline score: 3
Apr 17, 2021 at 6:55 history asked user38524 CC BY-SA 4.0