Timeline for What is the original Number of the Beast?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
26 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 11, 2023 at 21:17 | answer | added | ray grant | timeline score: 0 | |
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:56 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://christianity.stackexchange.com/ with https://christianity.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Jun 18, 2015 at 6:35 | answer | added | Micah Gafford | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jun 17, 2015 at 22:39 | history | protected | Susan | ||
| Jun 15, 2015 at 21:18 | answer | added | walter c. cambra | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jun 14, 2015 at 5:59 | answer | added | Dan | timeline score: 7 | |
| Sep 11, 2014 at 12:12 | history | edited | Dɑvïd |
edited tags
|
|
| Jul 5, 2014 at 10:31 | vote | accept | kenorb | ||
| Jul 4, 2014 at 7:23 | answer | added | Laurie Lombard | timeline score: -1 | |
| Jul 4, 2014 at 6:25 | answer | added | Tau | timeline score: 5 | |
| Jul 3, 2014 at 20:16 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackBibleHerm/status/484792753466146816 | ||
| Jul 3, 2014 at 17:22 | history | edited | kenorb | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
| Jul 3, 2014 at 17:03 | comment | added | skrap3e | I don't think that other then prophetic revelation, the significance, and the correctness of this scriptural point can ever be illuminated. I think it's fair to say, the beast does have a number, "this is the so-called number of the beast, which is stated to be the number of a man, which, if it could be identified, would show who was involved in the great deceptions imposed upon mankind." So without scriptural or prophetic guidance on the mechanism (an equation?) for making use of a number of the beast, the correctness of such a number has no value. | |
| Jul 3, 2014 at 15:49 | history | reopened |
Frank Luke ScottS Caleb |
||
| Jul 3, 2014 at 15:14 | comment | added | ScottS | I'm anticipating that with the edit this is going to get reopened. I did retag it, however, since "numbers" refers to the OT book of that name, and "translation-philosophy" and "contradiction" are not really the issue. Rather, your question is focused on a text-critical issue of which known variant is likely the correct reading. | |
| Jul 3, 2014 at 15:10 | history | edited | ScottS |
edited tags; edited tags
|
|
| Jul 3, 2014 at 13:48 | history | edited | kenorb | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 11 characters in body
|
| Jul 3, 2014 at 9:05 | history | edited | kenorb | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Picking one case of question as suggested, as it was too broad.
|
| Jul 2, 2014 at 14:28 | review | Reopen votes | |||
| Jul 3, 2014 at 15:52 | |||||
| Jul 2, 2014 at 14:09 | history | edited | kenorb | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 214 characters in body
|
| Jul 2, 2014 at 14:05 | history | closed |
ScottS Jack Douglas |
Needs more focus | |
| Jul 2, 2014 at 14:02 | history | edited | kenorb | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 73 characters in body
|
| Jul 2, 2014 at 13:57 | history | edited | kenorb | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 73 characters in body
|
| Jul 2, 2014 at 13:51 | history | edited | kenorb | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 73 characters in body
|
| Jul 2, 2014 at 13:47 | review | First posts | |||
| Jul 2, 2014 at 14:08 | |||||
| Jul 2, 2014 at 13:31 | history | asked | kenorb | CC BY-SA 3.0 |