New answers tagged

1 vote

Is there a contradiction between 2 Timothy 3:16-17 and Acts 16:6-10?

I agree that the canon of scripture as we now have it, is complete as suggested (but not conclusively) by 2 Tim 3:16. Actually, the completeness of Scripture as we now have it is not really defined ...
user avatar
  • 69.9k
2 votes
Accepted

Is there a contradiction between 2 Timothy 3:16-17 and Acts 16:6-10?

No contradiction here Formal logic This argument commits the fallacy of denying the antecedent. The classic form of this fallacy is: P1: P => Q P2: ~P C: ~Q This is invalid. We can apply that ...
user avatar
1 vote

Is there a contradiction between 2 Timothy 3:16-17 and Acts 16:6-10?

There is no contradiction. In the passage of the epistle to Timothy, Paul says that all scripture has an Origin in God and that it is good for different purposes, giving the the men of God (those who ...
user avatar
  • 276

Top 50 recent answers are included