The fact that both the Tree of Life and the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil were located "in the midst of the garden" indicates that God must have had to tell Adam which one was which.
And out of the ground made the LORD God to grow every tree that is
pleasant to the sight, and good for food; the tree of life also in the
midst of the garden,...
As I often investigate the scriptures to get to the truth, the most interesting discovery of both Trees is that God doesn’t give any description of those trees on how they look actually look, what color, what type and so on. So if there are multiple trees in a Garden even if they are in the middle and you are told two trees are in the middle but not to eat ...
Jesus' two most common titles in the NT are:
The Son of Man, Matt 11:19, 24:30, Mark 14:21, Luke 9:26, etc
The Son of God,
The Son of Man
The title "The Son of Man" serves several functions -
it is an allusion to Jesus full humanity (and ultimately mortality) as per the Hebrew idiom in places like Eze 21:19, 28:2, 33:2, 12, 37:16, 43:7, etc
OP, you asked:
But, whereas Adam was the Father of all mankind, why then is Jesus never called our Father? Why do the Scriptures consistently refer to him as "the Son"?
First, God is the “father” of all by virtue of the fact that he is the Creator of the human family. Humanity was fashioned in his very image (Genesis 1:26-27)
Do we not all have ...
What, then, is the significance of the "Second Adam" being "the Son of Man" not "Father of Man"?
The topic "Son of Man" in the Insight of the Scriptures brings out how this applies to Jesus Christi:
Christ Jesus, “the Son of Man.” In the Gospel accounts the expression is found nearly 80 times, applying in every case ...
According to Isaiah 9:6, one of the titles of the Messiah (the Christ) is "Everlasting Father". He is also called "the Mighty God" as is Yahweh in Isaiah 10:21. Herein lies the significance of the last Adam (not 'the second Adam' as you state). Herein lies the uncrossable chasm between the first man Adam being created by God out of dust, ...
Adam named his wife Eve, because she would become the mother of all the living.
Eve is called the mother of all the living but Adam is never called the Father of all mankind in the Bible.
OP: Adam was not a son, but the father of all mankind:
In fact, Adam is called the son of God in Luke 3:
the son of Enosh, the son of Seth, the son of ...
God is the only one who can make something out of nothing. We call that "Creation". That which is created does not die...(e.g.:angels).
Man was not created, he was made from existing material...dust. Woman was also made from existing material...man.
So man was not created, he was "formed of the dust of the ground...Gen. 2:7. Therefore, man is ...
New International Version Genesis 3:
To Adam he said, “Because you listened to your wife and ate fruit from the tree about which I commanded you, ‘You must not eat from it,’ “Cursed is the ground because of you; through painful toil you will eat food from it all the days of your life.
This was a general curse on the ground. Adam himself was not the ...
New American Standard Bible
26 Then God said, “Let Us make mankind in Our image, according to Our likeness; and let them rule over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the sky and over the livestock and over all the earth, and over every crawling thing that crawls on the earth.” 27So God created man in His own image, in the image of God He ...
The Bible does not say. So aside from that ; would result in hypothetical assumption.
We know they conceived already. Normally we don't see God make something half way then augment it later.
Procreation by people takes more than just the parts. Knowledge for what to do and people to consciously agree.