My answer might not be in line with the question if you only mean technical methods. However there is the obvious notion of prayer and reliance upon the Holy Spirit to open our eyes to what He has written to us. After all if the Spirit is the true author and men only the medium, we have more advantage in understanding the words by the Spirit than we would if we could talk to the original author. I would put this upon the same level as understanding the literal language itself. What I mean is without a spirit of payer on our meditation of the living word, we are like fools reading a book from another language only guessing at what each syllable means.

Reading the whole Bible in a spirit of meditative prayer and submitting to what God manifests to us, through the Spirit, is the most effective means if understanding it.

Sample bible verses that make this a fundament principle of exegesis are:

>Open my eyes that I may see wonderful things in your law. (NIV Psalm 119:18)

>13 We are not like Moses, who would put a veil over his face to prevent the Israelites from seeing the end of what was passing away. 14 But their minds were made dull, for to this day the same veil remains when the old covenant is read. It has not been removed, because only in Christ is it taken away. 15 Even to this day when Moses is read, a veil covers their hearts. 16 But whenever anyone turns to the Lord, the veil is taken away. 17 Now the Lord is the Spirit, and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is freedom. 18 And we all, who with unveiled faces contemplate[a] the Lord’s glory, are being transformed into his image with ever-increasing glory, which comes from the Lord, who is the Spirit. (NIV 2 Corinthians 3:13-18)

>17 I keep asking that the God of our Lord Jesus Christ, the glorious Father, may give you the Spirit[a] of wisdom and revelation, so that you may know him better. 18 I pray that the eyes of your heart may be enlightened in order that you may know the hope to which he has called you, the riches of his glorious inheritance in his holy people, 19 and his incomparably great power for us who believe. (NIV Ephesians 1:17-19)

>“This is the covenant I will make with the people of Israel
    after that time,” declares the Lord.
“I will put my law in their minds 
    and write it on their hearts. 
I will be their God,
    and they will be my people. 
34 No longer will they teach their neighbor,
    or say to one another, ‘Know the Lord,’
because they will all know me,
    from the least of them to the greatest,”
declares the Lord. (Jeremiah 31:33-34)

After meditative prayer with expectation that God will manifest the meaning by His Spirit, I would put understanding the language. I do not mean a degree in the language I simply mean recognizing each of the words in the text, the Bible uses a fairly extensive vocabulary and each word has special meaning for the Holy Spirit to have chosen it above others. After this I would say knowing the ‘whole Bible’ to form a context and recognizing the gradual unfolding of the redemption plan. Next, I would put understanding what men of God from previous generations have thought. This also usually includes repetition of ‘related history’ which is also very significant. However, I would say that 80% - 90% of scripture does not need any special historical background to fully follow the logic of the passages.  Next I would say it is also important to understanding the language as it was originally written in Hebrew or Greek. Finally, I would say using anything that helps, regardless of its origin, whether discoveries in science, archeology, art, even philosophy, your grandma’s jokes, anything in all the earth --- if it helps, can be used. Although all these added things amount to very little help, yet even appealing to ‘nature’ is used as valid exegesis by the Apostle Paul. Therefore all those things I listed after the Bible can be covered under God given reason and nature, including everything man made that is derived from what is studied in nature. Basically I am keeping ‘all doors open’, with little expectation. I doubt any advancement in knowledge over the next one thousand years will have any impact on 99% of biblical interpretation.

What I am saying is that the "eisogetical rules" are actually "exegetical" also just less important. They are drawn from scripture for, from nature comes natural reason, science, etc. and Paul argues from nature here, for example:

>18 The wrath of God is being revealed from heaven against all the godlessness and wickedness of people, who suppress the truth by their wickedness, 19 since what may be known about God is plain to them, because God has made it plain to them. 20 For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse. (NIV Romans 1:18-20)

Back to the main point though, studying the Bible is primarily not an intellectual exercise but a spiritual encounter with the voice of God. If we are not in a state of willingly hearing and submitting to His voice, our study will further confuse our minds. God's word never comes back void, it will harden or soften the heart. We will do what they did if we resist what is plain:

>21 For although they knew God, they neither glorified him as God nor gave thanks to him, but their thinking became futile and their foolish hearts were darkened. 22 Although they claimed to be wise, they became fools 23 and exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images made to look like a mortal human being and birds and animals and reptiles.
>24 Therefore God gave them over in the sinful desires of their hearts to sexual impurity for the degrading of their bodies with one another. 25 They exchanged the truth about God for a lie, and worshiped and served created things rather than the Creator—who is forever praised. Amen. (NIV Romans 1:21-24)

The worldly ‘objection’ that people might have to the self evincing perfect word of God by the illumination of the Holy Spirit, is that it exposes fools into claiming God has ‘taught them something’, like a private interpretation. However this objection is using incorrect exegesis in the meaning of 'private interpretatiom'. This objection has no relevance for most of us because fools will do that anyway, whether claiming private revelation or private exegeses. The fact is, since the days of Christ, bible believers have shared a common faith and it seems hardly fair to say such unanimous beliefs, derived from the overwhelming persuasiveness of God’s word, under the power of the Holy Spirit, is ‘private’. Rather, it is private only if it is man made. Only if the same Spirit reveals to us, the Spirit who originally spoke it through a prophet, ‘which was not the prophets private opinion’, can we say we do NOT have a private interpretation. Every other for of exegesis is a 'private interpretation' meaning it comes from the will of man and not God. We should know this above all:

>20 Above all, you must understand that no prophecy of Scripture came about by the prophet’s own interpretation of things. 21 For prophecy never had its origin in the human will, but prophets, though human, spoke from God as they were carried along by the Holy Spirit. (2 Peter 1:20-21)

By the same Spirit who carried the prophet along, are we carried along into an understanding of the text. We are to collect our manna direct from from Him. 

>If any of you lacks wisdom, you should ask God, who gives generously to all without finding fault, and it will be given to you. (NIV James 1:5)