1

(*) My question isn't just whether principles are customarily derived from Scripture, but also whether scholars have found them in the past, and whether they have done so systematically. Can they be? Is it accepted or frowned on? During textual analysis is it something to look out for? In that sense it is a broad question and I'm grateful for your knowledge and any further reading

But I'm not asking the converse: "are principles of exegesis derived from the text instead of how they are actually derived"

Or the obverse: "how are principles of exegesis derived?"

[humour] Or the obtuse: "please can someone explain what this following list of famous bible images all mean" [/humour]

===============================================

Briefly and by way of hypothesis, stories in literature often show the reader how to read them. And I mean at the level of parsing the words in a particular way. (E.g. in Elias Canetti's 'Auto da Fe' the first passage trains the reader to take each sentence as a fragmentary idea in the character's mind.)

If Matthew 13:1-23 is supposed to be (and I do) Jesus explaining how parables work, can with this be placed verses like the three examples below. I've put possible exegetical lessons for clarity - they are just to illustrate the sort of approach, I'm not asking about them per se. Or the verses [smile]

===========

Matthew 13:11

To you it has been given to know the secrets of the kingdom of heaven, but to them it has not been given

Exegesis is necessary

==

Daniel 2:30

this mystery has been revealed to me, not because I have greater wisdom than anyone else alive, but so that Your Majesty may know the interpretation

Exegesis must serve the reader's understanding

==

John 2:9

When the master of the feast tasted the water

Exegesis must be capable of being tested

==

Matthew 16:3

You know how to interpret the appearance of the sky, but you cannot interpret the signs of the times.

An exegetical proof that two passages are similar must account for why they are similar

===============================================

What I mean by a systematic approach is things like finding at the close-in level what the passages have in common or what marks them, and whether or not that can used as a test to finds complementary passages.

I should perhaps add this isn't asking about the Seven Rules of Hillel. And if it was, it would be something like "can we tell if the Rabbi derived them from the OT" This is about the NT.

Lastly, it isn't seeking 'Sola Scriptura', although I wouldn't exclude that perspective if it's on-point

===============================================

There has been a previous similar question on this, which was closed for its opinion-based format and answered at (for me) cross-purposes.

According to Scripture, how should we interpret Scripture?

===============================================

6
  • 1
    This question has a large literature and has been debated for centuries - a question like this will not settle it. hermeneutics can be simply summarized by saying something like - let the text say what it actually says, in context both literarily, culturally and linguistically. This is called the grammatical-historical method.
    – Dottard
    Commented Aug 5 at 10:44
  • @Dottard a signpost to the literature might settle it nicely. See, I'd have ignored that bookshelf because I don't see it's got much to do with grammar or history, but it goes with academic disciplines that they have jargon
    – FelixLXX
    Commented Aug 5 at 10:47
  • I have just given it to you - look up grammatical-historical method of hermeneutics,
    – Dottard
    Commented Aug 5 at 10:49
  • how do I mark the comment as the answer?
    – FelixLXX
    Commented Aug 5 at 10:50
  • Do you want me to make it into an answer?
    – Dottard
    Commented Aug 5 at 11:08

1 Answer 1

1

Hermeneutics can be simply summarized by saying something like: Let the text say what it actually says, in context both literarily, culturally and linguistically. This is called the grammatical-historical method.

Having said that, let me state a few cautions.

Some go too far:

  • 1 Cor 4:6 - ... so that you may learn from us the meaning of the saying, “Do not go beyond what is written.” ... Some attempt to extrapolate what the Scriptures say to make them say what was never intended.

Some do not go far enough:

  • some with select the texts they want to fit a preconceived theory and thus can draw any conclusion. [I call this cafeteria theology - selecting what you want and leaving the rest.] When looking at Bible information, one must consider ALL the evidence on a topic.

The Bible is a book about God and Jesus in particular

  • The Bible is not a book just about me but about the nature, character and methods of God. If something in the Bible does not teach about this, I would suggest it has been misunderstood.
  • John 5:39 - You search the Scriptures, for in them you think you have eternal life; and these are they which testify of Me.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.