2

Chapter 13 of Matthew contains several parables concerning the Kingdom of God. The illustration of The Weeds is one of them. In Jesus's interpretation of it, He stated that the good seed represent the Sons of the Kingdom.

Matt 13:38 - and the field is the world; and the good seed, these are the sons of the kingdom; and the weeds are the sons of the evil one;

Since these "seeds" are seen to be sown in the present era, can it be accurately inferred that the Kingdom is a present reality? And that the Kingdom of God was not postponed because of the rejection of Jesus as its King, by the Jewish hierarchy?

And can it be accurately interpreted that the Kingdom of God that Jesus came to rule over is definitely a spiritual kingdom that the Sons of the Kingdom are in, since a physical one in this present era does not exist?

In this interpretation by Jesus, the present situation seems to stay the same until the harvest at the End of the ages (sunteleis, Gk., "final completion"). So does this mean there is no change from a "spiritual kingdom to a physical one (political millennium?), as some Bible students teach? Should not Christians realize the awesome privilege of Sonship readily available, according to Jesus's statement? Or does this thought go beyond what Jesus was teaching?

1 Answer 1

2

I agree with the OP's theology. Indeed, Jesus stated this explicitly:

Luke 17:20, 21 - When asked by the Pharisees when the kingdom of God would come, Jesus replied, “The kingdom of God will not come with observable signs. Nor will people say, ‘Look, here it is,’ or ‘There it is.’ For you see, the kingdom of God is in your midst.”

Thus, the kingdom of God, or the kingdom of heaven (interchangeable in this context) is defined by the spiritual followers of Jesus and technically compose that who are "Christians" (Acts 11:26), literally, "ones like Christ".

Paul says the same thing again:

Gal 3:26-29 - You are all sons of God through faith in Christ Jesus. For all of you who were baptized into Christ have clothed yourselves with Christ. There is neither Jew nor Greek, slave nor free, male nor female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus. And if you belong to Christ, then you are Abraham’s seed and heirs according to the promise.

Indeed, almost every time the phrase "kingdom of God" is used in the NT it is to emphasize its spiritual nature and not its physical (or political) nature. Here is a sample:

  • Matt 12:28 - But if I cast out demons by the Spirit of God, then the kingdom of God has come upon you. (see also Luke 11:20)
  • John 3:5 - Jesus answered, “Truly, truly, I tell you, no one can enter the kingdom of God unless he is born of water and the Spirit.
  • Acts 8:12 - But when they believed Philip, proclaiming the gospel concerning the kingdom of God and the name of Jesus Christ, they were baptized, both men and women.
  • Mark 4:11 - He replied, “The mystery of the kingdom of God has been given to you, but to those on the outside everything is expressed in parables (see also Luke 8:10)
  • Matt 21:31 - Which of the two did the will of his father?” “The first,” they answered. Jesus said to them, “Truly I tell you, the tax collectors and prostitutes are entering the kingdom of God before you.

Thus, Jesus taught that the kingdom of God is a present reality. However, Jesus also taught that there would be an eschatological fulfilment of the kingdom of God when He said:

Mark 14:25 - Truly I say to you that never will I drink of the fruit of the vine again, until that day when I drink it anew in the kingdom of God."

  1. Culture vs Bible Teaching

It is well-known that the Jews, and especially the Pharisees, were both racist and spiritually (and ethologically) proud and elitist. One of the functions of Jesus' teaching was to dismantle that elitism in His teaching in Luke 17:20, 21 and Mark 13:38. (See appendix below). Jesus summed this up when He said (quoting Isa 56:7):

Mark 11:17 - Then Jesus began to teach them, and He declared, “Is it not written: ‘My house will be called a house of prayer for all the nations’? But you have made it ‘a den of robbers.’ ”

Thus, the temple should have been open to all, including gentiles.

Therefore, the "dividing wall" was a cultural one and not a real theological barrier that had been false erected by the elitism of the Jews. Both Jesus and Paul emphasized this.

APPENDIX - Jews vs Gentiles

The covenant promises were always open to all people and was never exclusive. For example:

  • Abraham’s own household must have consisted of perhaps 2000 people just to be able to raise an army of 318 men to liberate Lot, Gen 14:14. Indeed, Abraham’s chief servant (from Damascus) was clearly a believer and very devout as shown in Gen 24.
  • The unfortunate story in Gen 38 about Judah and Tamar shows that a foreigner became the mother of the tribe of Judah.
  • When Jacob entered Egypt, his family numbered 75 people (Acts 7:14, Ex 1:5). Some of these were not direct descendants of Abraham such as the wives of the 12 patriarchs, notably Joseph’s own wife. 215 years and four generations later at the exodus, Israel’s army had over 600,000 men, excluding women and children, (Ex 12:37, Num 1:46, etc) suggesting a total population of several million people, requiring many additions. This included a significant mixed multitude (Ex 12:38) showing that Israel obviously consisted of many non-biological Jews had joined. (Note that it is biologically impossible for Israelite numbers to have grown from 75 to several million biologically without many outside additions.)
  • Moses married a Midianite (Ex 2:16-21) also known as a Cushite. Miriam and Aaron were severely reprimanded and punished for displaying racism (Num 12:1, 2)
  • Caleb, who represented and led the tribe of Judah was a Kennizite (Num 32:12).
  • Rahab was a Canaanite (Josh 2:1, 2, Matt 1:5)
  • Ruth was Moabite (Ruth 1:4 16, 17, Matt 1:5) – these last two make King David descended from foreigners (Ruth 4:13-16).
  • Uriah was a Hittite (2 Sam 11:3)
  • King David’s elite personal (and very loyal) regiment consisted of Gittites, that is, Philistines (2 Sam 15:18-22, 1 Chron 18:17)
  • Isa 56:6, 7 - And the foreigners who join themselves to the LORD to minister to Him, to love the name of the LORD, and to be His servants— all who keep the Sabbath without profaning it and who hold fast to My covenant—I will bring them to My holy mountain and make them joyful in My house of prayer. Their burnt offerings and sacrifices will be accepted on My altar, for My house will be called a house of prayer for all the nations.” See also V3.
  • The Rechabites were Kenites (Jer 35:1-19)
  • Many other foreigners lived in Israel (1 Chron 22:2, 17, 2 Chron 30:25)
  • In Esther’s time “many of the people of the land became Jews” (Esther 8:17, 9:27)
  • Even in NT times, many Jewish synagogues were attended by godly gentiles converted to Judaism (Acts 13:16, 26, 16:14, 17:17)
  • Many Jewish proselytes came to worship in Jerusalem (John 20:20, Acts 2:9-11)
  • Jesus quotes Isa 56:7, “My house shall be a house of prayer for all nations”, Mark 11:17.
2
  • @ Dottard - Concerning "eschatology" have you considered that Mark 14:25 (drink of the fruit of the vine in the Kingdom) may have a fulfilment in Acts 10:41 (He ate and drank), since Jesus spent 40 days, after the resurrection, teaching on the Kingdom. During the 40 days Jesus, no doubt, ate and drank. Unless we infer that he only drank water or goat's milk, it is probable that He drank some fruit of the vine at meal-time.---This not to say there is no eschatological expectation. There is a Second Coming when Jesus will wrap things up spectacularly. (1 Corinthians 15:24 Happy Easter!
    – ray grant
    Commented Mar 30 at 20:09
  • @raygrant - good point - that is quite possible. Unfortunately, we have no record of this to confirm it; but it is not impossible.
    – Dottard
    Commented Mar 30 at 20:30

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.