When Mary heard from the angel Gabriel that Elizabeth was in her 6th month of pregnancy, Mary quickly left to join her. As the two greeted and the baby John leaped for joy in her womb, Elizabeth was filled with the Holy Spirit and couldn’t believe Mary would come to her that she exclaimed

Luke 1:42-45 “Blessed are you among women, and blessed is the child you will bear! But why am I so favored, that the mother of my Lord should come to me? As soon as the sound of your greeting reached my ears, the baby in my womb leaped for joy. Blessed is she who has believed that the Lord would fulfill his promises to her!”

After noting the three had all that excitement and gratefulness, we soon read the following verses in an interesting order:

Luke 1:56 Mary stayed with Elizabeth for about 3 months and then returned home.

Luke 1:57-58 When it was time for Elizabeth to have her baby, she gave birth to a son. Her neighbors and relatives heard that the Lord had shown her great mercy, and they shared her joy.

Q: When Mary left to go home, Elizabeth would have been in about her 9th month of pregnancy (6th month + “about 3 months” she stayed). With the author having written verses 56 through 58 in that order, was he saying Mary actually left Elizabeth before John was born?


Lk 1:57, where Elizabeth gives birth, comes after Lk 1:56, where Mary leaves. Though this in itself is not conclusive evidence that Mary left before John was born, it is an indication.

Furthermore, Lk 1:58-36 talk about how Elizabeth's neighbors reacted, and how her relatives who had just heard the good news reacted, and how Zachariah reacted - there is nothing about Mary's reaction. Since she already knew the good news, I do not believe she should be classified among Elizabeth's relatives. Thus, since Mary's absence from the following verses is conspicuous, it is best to assume she wasn't there.

Neither of these two points are conclusive or completely convincing, but they seem to be the best indications we have.

| improve this answer | |
  • A.) I do not believe she should be classified among Elizabeth's relatives. B.) What do you mean by this - doesn't the text say different? C.) Luke 1:36 And behold, even your relative Elizabeth has also conceived a son in her old age; – elika kohen Apr 21 '17 at 17:47

Mary made a wise decision to leave before Elizabeth gave birth to John.

Mary after staying with her relative (Luke 1:36) Elizabeth, for about three months and helping her in the last months of her pregnacy, decides to leave just before Elizabeth gives birth to John.

Why?. Most like is that neighbors and relatives of them would come to visit Elizabeth. Mary now is at the early days of the fourth month of her pregnancy, single and unmarried would most likely be embarrassed, so she decides to return to Nazareth

Luke 1:56-57 (NRSV)

56 And Mary remained with her about three months and then returned to her home.

The Birth of John the Baptist

57 Now the time came for Elizabeth to give birth, and she bore a son. 58 Her neighbors and relatives heard that the Lord had shown his great mercy to her, and they rejoiced with her.

| improve this answer | |

She left in order to remain ritually clean so as not to come in contact with blood from the birth of John. Mary remained a pure vessel...the tabernacle of the Lord.

| improve this answer | |
  • 1
    This may be the case but you need to provide some evidence, such as quoting the applicable purity law that she would be obeying. Just saying it is so is not enough for this site. Kind of like college. – Ruminator Sep 29 '18 at 15:05

According to Lev 15:19-24, staying until the birth would have made Mary unclean, as she would likely be involved in the birth to some degree. Adhering to Scripture, as stated, it is inclusive. But Mary, being a humble, obedient servant, likely would do whatever she could to remain clean according to the law.

| improve this answer | |
  • Welcome to BHSE! Good answer. Please make sure you take our tour. Re: Questions and answers, please include the citation for us to actually see (e.g. as Ozzie does with Luke 1:56-57 below, or I do in my Q). Thanks. – John Martin Jan 28 at 16:16

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.