Translation of προσκυνεω in Matthew 4:9-10 vs 28:17

Question

The New World Translation (NWT) translates προσκυνεω and προσκυνεω in Matthew 4:8-11 like so (emphasis mine):

Again the Devil took him along to an unusually high mountain and showed him all the kingdoms of the world and their glory. And he said to him: "All these things I will give you if you fall down and do an act of worship to me." Then Jesus said to him: “Go away, Satan! For it is written: 'It is Jehovah your God you must worship, and it is to him alone you must render sacred service.'" Then the Devil left him, and look! angels came and began to minister to him.

However, in Matthew 28:16-20, the NWT renders προσεκύνησαν like so (emphasis mine):

However, the 11 disciples went to Galʹi·lee to the mountain where Jesus had arranged for them to meet. When they saw him, they did obeisance, but some doubted. Jesus approached and spoke to them, saying: "All authority has been given me in heaven and on the earth. Go, therefore, and make disciples of people of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the holy spirit, teaching them to observe all the things I have commanded you. And look! I am with you all the days until the conclusion of the system of things."

Obviously the NWT translators thought that two different meanings of προσκυνεω are operative between these two passages; whereas a translation like the NIV renders them all uniformly as "worship." What contextual clues are there to help us know if the author intended these uses of προσκυνεω to be understood having the same meaning or a different meaning?

Answer 1

First, the BDAG definition, which is singular, for this word, προσκυνέω is:

to express in attitude or gesture one's complete dependence on or submission to a high authority figure, (fall down and) worship, do obeisance to, prostrate oneself before, do reverence to, welcome respectfully

The 60 occurrences of this verb in the NT can be classified according to the wording of the stated object:

• worship to "Him" (ie, Jesus), Matt 2:2, 8, 11, 8:2, 9:18, 14:33, 15:25, 28:9, Mark 5:6, 15:19, Luke 24:52, John 9:38, Heb 1:6,
• worship to God, Matt 4:10, Luke 4:8, John 4:21, 23, 24, 1 Cor 14:25, Rev 4:10, 7:11, 11:16, 14:7, 19:4, 19:10, 22:9.
• One servant "begs" him [another servant], Matt 18:26
• Rev 3:9 - those who belong to the synagogue of Satan, who claim to be Jews but are liars instead. I will make them come and bow down at your feet and acknowledge that I have loved you.
• worship "me" (ie, Satan), Matt 4:9, Luke 4:7
• worship demons, Rev 9:20
• worship the Dragon, Rev 13:4
• worship the beast, Rev 13:4, 8, 12, 14:9, 11, 19:20
• worship the image to the beast, Rev 13:15, 16:2, 20:4
• worship to him (an angel), Rev 19:10, 22:8
• images of false gods to worship them, Acts 7:43
• No explicit object but only an implied object or general worship at a temple, etc: Matt 20:20 [Jesus implied], Matt 28:17 [Jesus implied], John 4:20 [God implied], John 4:22, 24 [The Father implied], John 12:20, Acts 8:27, Acts 10:25 [Peter implied], Acts 10:25, 24:11, Heb 11:21 [God implied], Rev 5:14 [God and the Lamb implied], 11:1, 15:4 [God implied].

Let us observe several patterns in this survey.

1. the grammatical construction used for "worship to Him/God" (usually the dative) is identical to that used when describing worship to Jesus (again with the dative)
2. With the exceptions to be listed below worship to anything other than the Father and Jesus is condemned and unlawful and sinful. This is true of the worship of the beast, the dragon, the image of the beast, Peter, an angel, images of false gods, etc. (See the above list for references.)

The exceptions

The exceptions to the above observations are these (my literal translations):

A: Matt 18:26 - Therefore, having fallen down the servant was "worshipping" to him saying, have patience with me and I will pay all to you. Note that in this case, the purpose of the "worship" is to beg time for paying the debt, not adoration of the servant. Thus, in this instance, it would be better to translate προσκυνέω as "begging on his knees" as most versions correct render it.

B: Rev 3:9 - Behold, I give [those] from the synagogue of Satan, those declaring themselves to be Jews but are not (but they lie) - behold I will cause them to come and "worship" before your feet and that shall know that I loved you. Again, observe that the purpose of this bowing at the feet of the saints is not to give adoration to the saints but to acknowledge that they were correct to worship God and that God loved them. Thus, in this instance, it would be better to translate προσκυνέω as "fall down at your feet" as most versions do. Further, notice that the grammatical construction has no dative; that is we do not have "worship to them" or similar - they simply fall at the feet of the saints to acknowledge something.

CONCLUSION

The grammatical construction in all cases in the NT of worship to God (προσκυνήσει τῷ Θεῷ, etc) and worship to Him/Jesus and thus no difference in translation by context or grammar is warranted.

APPENDIX - Command

Regardless of how we translate the verb προσκυνέω, we are told several times in the NT that whatever it is, we must only do it to God alone, Matt 4:10, Luke 4:8, Acts 10:25, 26, Rev 19:10, 22:8, 9.

Yet, despite this, the NT records numerous cases of people worshipping Jesus (as listed above) as one of the many pieces of evidence of the deity of Christ. This is not the only evidence of this in the NT, we also have Jesus referred to many times by the titles of God in the OT, but this is the subject of another question that I will not enter here.

Answer 2

Yes, and the NWT translators differentiate and they are plain wrong in doing that, because in the second instance also the same strong semantics is in the προσκυνέω, that is to say the divine honor and worship is offered to Christ, which is clearly said in the very ending of Matthew 28, for the worship is given to the one who shares the same name with the Father, for nobody can be with the Father without being baptized in the name (not names) of the Father and the Son and the H. Ghost (Matthew 28:19), that is to say, it is impossible for man to be with the Father without the Son and H.Ghost, and if so, then all three are God, the latter Notion expressed by the singular of the word "name". Thus, God is Trinity and who does not have Son cannot have Father (John 14:6; 1 John 2:23) and who does not have H.Ghost cannot know the Father (1 Cor. 2:11).

Therefore, again, if the Son and the H.Ghost are necessary for the Father to be linked with humans or make humans to be linked with Himself, then necessarily the Son and the H.Ghost are also God. So, how then προσκυνήσις to the God-Son, the Lord Jesus Christ be any less than the worship in the strong sense of divine worship?

NWT translators, be better in the next edition of your translation and try to abstain from a worthless penchant of misleading both yourself and the readers.

Answer 3

Part of the confusion may lie in the fact that the English word "worship" had a wider semantic meaning than it does today. And they came and held him by the feet, and worshipped him (Matthew 28:9) meant something different to a 17th century reader of the King James Bible than it does today.

Laurent Cleenewerck writes on this in the introduction to The Eastern/Greek Orthodox Bible: New Testament

In modern English, “worship” (like prayer) has mainly taken on the meaning of an act (invocation, prostration) offered exclusively to God. However, the original and official semantic range of this word used to be much wider, as was the case of the Greek word προσκυνῆω (proskuneo) which is normatively applied to God but also to human beings. The idea conveyed by proskuneo is that of “offering obeisance,” “making a physical demonstration of veneration and respect” or “prostrating oneself.” With this in mind, the New American Bible sometimes translates proskuneo as “to do homage,” including when applied to Jesus.

Answer 4

What contextual clues are there to help us know if the author intended these uses of προσκυνεω to be understood having the same meaning or a different meaning?

The context in Matthew 4:9 tells us that the word "Worship" (proskynēseis) is not the same as sacred service.

Worship προσκυνήσεις (proskynēseis) Verb - Future Indicative Active - 2nd Person Singular Strong's 4352: From pros and a probable derivative of kuon; to fawn or crouch to, i.e. prostrate oneself in homage.

Matthew 4:10 has the word "serve" (latreuseis)

λατρεύσεις (latreuseis) Verb - Future Indicative Active - 2nd Person Singular Strong's 3000: To serve, especially God, perhaps simply: I worship. From latris; to minister, i.e. Render religious homage.

There is no record in the New Testament where (latreuseis) sacred service was offered to Jesus.

The clues are there in the verses cited.