4

2 Peter 3:3-13 (ESV):

3 knowing this first of all, that scoffers will come in the last days with scoffing, following their own sinful desires. 4 They will say, “Where is the promise of his coming? For ever since the fathers fell asleep, all things are continuing as they were from the beginning of creation.” 5 For they deliberately overlook this fact, that the heavens existed long ago, and the earth was formed out of water and through water by the word of God, 6 and that by means of these the world that then existed was deluged with water and perished. 7 But by the same word the heavens and earth that now exist are stored up for fire, being kept until the day of judgment and destruction of the ungodly.

8 But do not overlook this one fact, beloved, that with the Lord one day is as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day. 9 The Lord is not slow to fulfill his promise as some count slowness, but is patient toward you, not wishing that any should perish, but that all should reach repentance. 10 But the day of the Lord will come like a thief, and then the heavens will pass away with a roar, and the heavenly bodies will be burned up and dissolved, and the earth and the works that are done on it will be exposed.

11 Since all these things are thus to be dissolved, what sort of people ought you to be in lives of holiness and godliness, 12 waiting for and hastening the coming of the day of God, because of which the heavens will be set on fire and dissolved, and the heavenly bodies will melt as they burn! 13 But according to his promise we are waiting for new heavens and a new earth in which righteousness dwells.

There are several interesting points that Peter raises in this passage:

  • He mentions end times scoffers who will point out the delay in the Lord's (second?) coming, to which Peter counterargues with God's perspective on time: with the Lord one day is as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day (v8). This appears to suggest that long delays of thousands of years shouldn't be something to be surprised about.
  • He also mentions a day of judgement and destruction of the ungodly (v7).
  • He says that the day of the Lord will be sudden and unforeseen, like a thief (v10), followed by cataclysmic events affecting the earth and the heavens (v7, v10, v12).
  • These destructive events would be followed by new heavens and a new earth (v13).

To what extent is it possible to interpret these prophetic predictions by Peter as already historically fulfilled?


Related: Is there any interpretative room for considering the prophetic predictions of Matthew 24:29-31 as already fulfilled?

5 Answers 5

1

Yes, as it requires being familiar with OT prophetic language and metaphors. If we were to throw out all other scriptures, and if we were to ignore the metaphors of God’s prophetic judgment language (1) then we might be justified in believing this prophesy of 2 Peter 3 was of a some yet future, literal, end-of-the-world destruction.

But, 2 Pet. 3 is not about some long distant future to us, but of a near future prophesy to those to whom Peter was speaking and it took place in their lifetime of the 1st century AD. Any verse or scripture that is used or “interpreted” to contradict any other verse or scripture is being misapplied.

The scriptures make a very strong case for God’s control over, and maintenance of this earthly realm. In Solomon’s description of the operations of the earth, sun, wind, and sea, we find in Ecc. 1:4,

“One generation passeth away, and another generation cometh: but the earth abideth for ever.“ (KJV)

In the Interlinear for the original Hebrew this verse reads,

“[One] generation passes away and [another] generation comes but the earth forever stays.”

The word “forever” is Strong’s Heb. 5769, “עוֹלָם”, transliterated as “olam” and is defined as long duration, antiquity, or futurity.(2) It has several different applications in the English as “ages, all successive, always, ancient, ancient times, continual, days of old, eternal, eternity, ever, Everlasting, everlasting, forever, forever and ever, forevermore, lasting, long, long ago, long past, long time, never, old, permanent, permanently, perpetual, and perpetually – depending upon the context of the scripture.

It will be helpful to explore the use of always and forever in another post, but for the immediate use in the context of Ecc. 1:4 it has the meaning in Brown-Driver-Briggs (BDB) at 2.b, – continuous existence.

The word “stays” is Strong’s Heb. 5975 “עָמַד”, transliterated as “amad” and is defined as “stand”.(3) It is another word with many uses in the English, but the BDB defines it in Eccl. 1:4 as 3.c – continue, abide.

We need to explore one more word which has various meanings in scripture – “earth”. “Earth” is Strong’s Heb. 776 ‘אָ֫רֶץ” transliterated as “erets” and is defined as “land.” (4) Earth is used in the English translations for common, countries, countries and their lands, country, countryside, distance, dust, the ground, floor, land, lands, piece, plateau, region, territories, wild, and world.

I have discussed some of the uses of “earth” in the post “Heaven and Earth Have Passed Away.” (5) When it is used in prophesy it takes on the meaning of the people and the land or region they inhabit to whom the prophet was specifically speaking. When God sent the prophet to Israel, the “earth” was the people of Israel, and the land of Israel. The same for Babylon, Egypt, Edom, Tyre, etc.

But, in Ecc. 1:4, the meaning for “earth” is BDB 1.b, “earth, opposed to heaven, sky, as permanent.” See Biblehub.

I do not see any use of metaphors, similes, poetical, nor figurative images in the context of Ecc. 1:4-7. It does not appear to be a prophesy. Therefore, Ecc. 1:4 reads as a literal descriptive passage.

The meaning of Ecc. 1:4 appears to demand an understanding of a permanent, continually abiding earth.

In Gen. 8:21-22 God made a statement after the flood receded and Noah and his family left the ark.

“21 And the Lord smelled a sweet savour; and the Lord said in his heart, I will not again curse the ground any more for man’s sake; for the imagination of man’s heart is evil from his youth; neither will I again smite any more every thing living, as I have done.

22 While the earth remaineth, seedtime and harvest, and cold and heat, and summer and winter, and day and night shall not cease.“ (KJV)

There is a further promise found in Gen. 9:11 that God would never again destroy the people by a flood, which is part of the rainbow covenant God gave to Noah.

“And I have established My covenant with you, and all flesh is not any more cut off by waters of a deluge, and there is not any more a deluge to destroy the earth.'” (YLT)

But, the sign of the rainbow covenant with Noah does not negate the earlier statement God made in Gen. chap. 8 that He would never again “curse the ground” for man’s sake.

We could also explore Psa. 78:69, or Psa. 104:5; Isa. 9:7; 45:17; Dan. 4:3; Eph. 3:21 among many other scriptures. But, with just the above verses in mind, with the understanding that they seem to be literal statements that speak of the earth as permanent; and that God will not again destroy all people from off the earth; we therefore have to find the meaning in the prophesy of 2 Pet. 3:5-13 that does not contradict Ecc. 1:4, nor Gen. 8:21.

We must study 2 Pet. 3 within the context of that epistle for a meaning and understanding of that specific prophesy that does no violence to the whole of the scriptures.

Chapter 3 of 2 Peter continues from the discussion of false teachers and false prophets in chap. 2. Peter had been stressing the need to stay faithful, and not to heed the sensual and lustful ways of the false teachers. He had stressed the previous judgments God had poured out upon the wicked ones of past generations, and finished with a comparison of those who had come out of pagan idolatry and false religion only to turn back again as dogs to vomit (2 Pet. 2 22).

In chap. 3 Peter continues the theme of God’s judgment upon the wicked, reminding them that the scoffers who were saying that all things continue the same were repeating the error of their fathers who had said the same before the flood of Noah’s day. And, in verse 6 Peter reminds them that the “world that then was ….perished”.

What perished ? The physical earth? Did the skies and the air disappear? Is the earth gone? Are the stars in the heavens gone?

The “world” that perished was the politic society that then existed, the living men and women and animals who died in the waters of the flood! The physical earth is still here!

We are here and we exist by the grace of God. We breathe air He gave us. We eat food from the seed of the plants He gave us. We have water to drink that God gave us. Our entire existence is only because of the grace of God. And, as our Creator, He has the perfect right to come in judgment against the wicked ones whenever He chooses to do so.

Psa. 19:9, “The fear of the Lord is clean, enduring for ever: the judgments of the Lord are true and righteous altogether.” (KJV)

Peter opens chapter 3 of his second epistle with the reminder of God’s judgment upon the wicked. The context is of God’s judgments against wicked men. Verse 10 specifically uses the indicator of prophesy – “the day of the Lord.” Upon seeing those words from OT prophesies of judgment times, we immediately know that we need to be watching for His prophetic metaphors.

“heavens shall pass away”

The kingdoms of men were and are “heavens” under the authority of Christ whose everlasting kingdom is over all the earthly kingdoms of men (Dan. 7:14, 27), which earthly kingdoms are the only “heavens” that can pass away. The heaven where God sits on His throne will never pass away.(5)

“the elements shall melt”

Strong’s Gr. 4747 “στοιχεῖον” transliterated as “stoicheion” and it means one of a row, hence a letter (of the alphabet), by ext. the elements (of knowledge). The elements are the fundamentals, an orderly arrangement like the basic components of philosophy, structure, or first principles. It refers to the elements and rudiments of religious training and the ceremonial precepts of worship. (6)

It is used in the context of being in bondage under the elements of the law in Gal. 4:3-5. The word is rendered as “rudiments” in Col. 2:8, 20 where the traditions of men, and ordinances of men are discussed. It is translated as “principles” in Heb. 5:12 for the first principles of the gospel.

God used the phrase “heaven and earth” in the OT as a compound metaphor for the Mosaic covenant. Therefore, the "new heaven and earth" referred to the new covenant under the gospel of Christ. This prophesy in 2 Pet. 3 is discussing the passing away which Christ prophesied in Matt. 24:35 in the context of the destruction of the temple at Jerusalem.

“Heaven and earth shall pass away, but my words shall not pass away.” (KJV)

Christ’s words – the gospel, the new covenant, the new heaven and earth were compared to the old heaven and earth of the Mosaic covenant which was about to pass away in that first century A.D.

Instead of staying with the definition of Strong’s Gr. 4747, all of the commentaries I have read on 2 Pet. 3:10 either incorporated the dispensationalist teaching of the millennium – which the posts at my site have provided much scriptural evidence against, and which false doctrine therefore could not have been God’s intent – or they followed the traditional writings of the early church fathers such as Justin, or incorporated Greek philosophy of the four elements of the material creation, or were grasping upon faulty misconceptions of other prophetic language for the signs of the sun, moon and stars.

The commentators did not keep to the definition of the word “stoicheion.” They read their belief system into the scriptures instead of relying only upon God’s word. A blind adherence to a belief system has caused this confusion regarding 2 Peter c. 3.

Strict discipline is necessary in reading and understanding God’s prophetic language. Failing to recognize His use of metaphors in His prophesy from His original use in the Old Testament (OT) is guaranteed to lead the student off track.

Contrary to Thayer’s Greek Lexicon and most commentaries, the elements that melted were not the elements of the material creation, but were instead the religious and ceremonial principles, the orderly arrangement of the worship of God under the old law of the Mosaic covenant. We are dealing with prophetic language in this chapter, and must remember God’s use of metaphors.

The word translated as “melt” in the KJV is Strong’s Gr. 3089, ” λύω” transliterated as “luo” and means (a) I loose, untie, release, (b) met: I break, destroy, set at naught, contravene; I break up a meeting, annul.” Thayer’s Lexicon attributes the definition of “to destroy” in verse 10, but for the same word in verse 12 it assigns “to overthrow or do away with.” (7)

God was overthrowing, setting loose, breaking up, putting away, annulling (Heb 7:18) the old Mosaic covenant!

“the earth also and the works that are therein”

In God’s prophetic language “the earth” was the people and the land to whom the prophet was speaking. This is the same “earth” that Christ was sent to – Israel. This is the same “earth” that He sent His disciples to, and whom he warned would not finish going through the cities of Israel before He came again (Matt. 10:23).

The “earth” is God’s footstool (Isa. 66:1), and God cast the beauty of Israel down from “heaven unto the earth” and did not remember His footstool (Lam. 2:1). In OT prophesy, “earth” most often represented the land of Israel.

Just so, the “earth” and the “works therein” of 2 Pet. 3:10 was the remnant of Israel: Judea, Jerusalem, and the animal sacrificial sin offerings at the temple which had become profane after Christ’s once and forever sacrifice on the cross.

Heb. 9:26, “For then must he often have suffered since the foundation of the world: but now once in the end of the world hath he appeared to put away sin by the sacrifice of himself.” (KJV)

When did He appear? When was Christ crucified? And, when did He put away sin by His sacrifice? Let’s read it again in Young’s Literal Translation.

“ since it had behoved him many times to suffer from the foundation of the world, but now once, at the full end of the ages, for putting away of sin through his sacrifice, he hath been manifested;” (YLT)

The English translators used “end of the world” incorrectly in the KJV. It was the end of their world as they knew it.. the end of the world that centered around that old Mosaic temple, but it was not literally the end of all life on earth, nor of the physical cosmos!

The full end of the ages occurred when Christ was sacrificed for our sins in the first century A.D. That was when He was manifested in “these last days” (1 Pet 1:20), and those were the last days… of the old covenant.

The double fulfillment of Ezek 22:18-22 –

“18 Son of man, the house of Israel is to me become dross: all they are brass, and tin, and iron, and lead, in the midst of the furnace; they are even the dross of silver.

19 Therefore thus saith the Lord God; Because ye are all become dross, behold, therefore I will gather you into the midst of Jerusalem.

20 As they gather silver, and brass, and iron, and lead, and tin, into the midst of the furnace, to blow the fire upon it, to melt it; so will I gather you in mine anger and in my fury, and I will leave you there, and melt you.

21 Yea, I will gather you, and blow upon you in the fire of my wrath, and ye shall be melted in the midst therof.

22 As silver is melted in the midst of the furnace, so shall ye be melted in the midst thereof; and ye shall know that I the Lord have poured out my fury upon you.” (KJV)

Lam. 2:4. “He hath bent his bow like an enemy: he stood with his right hand as an adversary, and slew all that were pleasant to the eye in the tabernacle of the daughter of Zion: he poured out his fury like fire.” (KJV)

Brass, tin, iron, lead, silver… these are all physical, natural elements that can be melted in a fiery furnace. Here, “melt” is Strong’s Heb. 5413, ” נָתַך” or “nathak”, and means poured out.(8) Melting the elements allows them to be reshaped and reformed. God’s judgment upon wicked men is poured out like fire. The word “like” indicates a METAPHOR!

God’s fury – judgment – was poured out like fire, burning the elements of those sinful, wicked men in A.D. 70 at that temple in Jerusalem for sacrificing His son (Rev. 1:7) and for continuing, even preferring the animal sacrifices of the Mosaic covenant in that temple (Rev. 2:9; 3:9)!

God’s fury “melted” those people in Jerusalem in the Roman siege of A.D. 70 just as surely as He “melted” the fundamental and orderly principles (elements) of the Mosaic covenant in the destruction of the temple.

Imagine, if you will, the longing of Peter’s audience for Christ’s second appearance. They were wondering and asking “when”… when is He coming? How long do we have to wait? They knew His promise to return. They expected it.

Peter and the apostles did not contradict their expectation, nor tell them they were wrong. They were constantly adjuring and admonishing those of that generation to patiently endure, to keep the faith, to keep believing, to stay with the first principles (elements) of the gospel (Heb. 5:12). The apostles repeatedly reminded them again and again that they would get through those hard times.

Can you imagine their shock if the meaning of this prophesy in 2 Peter 3 was in essence saying, “Oh, and by the way, once you endure all this, the world is going to end.”

2 Peter c. 3 was not discussing the end of the physical cosmos. If that was the meaning, if that was what they understood from this prophesy, wouldn’t they have thrown up their hands, and turned from Peter as from a mad man? Might they not instead have thought, “well, why bother if the world is going to end?”

The first audience is the relative point of view. The audience of this chapter was the first century AD Christians. We are not the first audience. It is recorded for our example, and for our admonition, but the first audience had to know and understand the meaning.

They knew the prophesy of the destruction of that temple in Jerusalem (Matt. 24). They were waiting for it. And, Peter’s reminder in verse 11 to live holy and godly lives, and again in verse 13 to look for the righteousness that was coming in the new heavens and new earth covenant relationship.. the spiritual orderly arrangement (elements) of the gospel kingdom… was their hope to cling to.

He wasn’t promising them hope of heaven. They already had that once they were baptized. He was promising them the peace of the kingdom which would be fully established after the destruction of the old heaven and earth temple system. 2 Peter c. 3 was prophesying the end of the old covenant, and the destruction of that 2nd temple in Jerusalem.

As that temple was destroyed in the Roman siege of A.D. 70, the Sanhedrin and Pharisaical Jews were no longer a threat. That old elemental covenant was removed, and they were free from the old law that was constantly being shoved at them by the false teachers and unbelievers still practicing it in Jerusalem. That was the day they were being told to look forward to in verse 12.

Heb. 12:26- 29, speaking of the removal of the old covenant –

“26 Whose voice then shook the earth: but now he hath promised, saying, Yet once more I shake not the earth only, but also heaven.

27 And this word, Yet once more, signifieth the removing of those things that are shaken, as of things that are made, that those things which cannot be shaken may remain.

28 Wherefore we receiving a kingdom which cannot be moved, let us have grace, whereby we may serve God acceptably with reverence and godly fear:

29 For our God is a consuming fire.” (KJV)

2 Peter 3 was not speaking of the destruction of the literal, natural earth. The prophesy was discussing the same shaking of the “earth” of Israel, and the same removal of the old Mosaic covenant as all of the book of Hebrews discussed.

And that is when Jesus told His disciples that he would remove all the sheep and the goats from the grave (Hades) in Matt. 25:31-46. That is when Daniel stood in his lot at the "end of the days" of the 490 year prophesy from Dan. 9:24. (9) (10)

The prophesy of 2 Pet. 3:3-13 have already been fulfilled at the destruction of that temple in Jerusalem in AD 70.

If God should decide someday to destroy the physical, natural world… which the scriptures do not seem to indicate… it is my opinion, and just a suggestion that He would only do so whenever He knew that no one else was going to turn to Him. Just as in the days of Noah, when no one else but Noah would listen to Him…. well, maybe someday, if the world ever gets to that point again.

But, as long as He has a harvest of souls (Matt. 9:37-38), as long as there are people who will believe in Him and stand for Him, I believe He will continue to maintain this earthly realm… “to all the generations of the age of the ages. Amen” (Eph. 3:21, YLT).

Notes:

  1. Frequent Mistakes - Part V : ShreddingTheVeil

  2. Strong's Heb. 5769, olam - Biblehub

  3. Strong's Heb. 5975, amad - Biblehub

  4. Strong's Heb. 776, eretz - Biblehub

  5. Heaven and Earth Have Passed Away - ShreddingTheVeil

  6. Strong's Gr. 4747, stoicheion - Biblehub

  7. Strong's Gr. 3089, luo - Biblehub

  8. strong's Heb. 5413, nathak - Biblehub

  9. Testing The Spirits - Part II: The End - ShreddingTheVeil

  10. Testing The Spirits - Part III: Daniel's Lot - ShreddingTheVeil

0

They are partially fulfilled. However, the part of the prophecy that most people see in this passage is as the tip of the iceberg: there is a trove beneath the surface.

For those interested in doing a little digging into the treasure of 2 Peter 3:1-13, I would point out the following clues to get started:

  1. Notice what Peter speaks of in verse 4: "creation."
  2. Look at what Peter says in verses 5 & 6 with respect to creation.
  3. Ask yourself if the Flood happened during creation. It didn't? Then what is Peter saying?
  4. Now look at the big prophetic clue that Peter gives in verse 8 to help unpack what he is referring to.
  5. Go back and read the creation account, looking at the symbols God placed within each day of the week as prophetic representations. For example, what do light, water, grass, etc. represent in prophecy.
  6. Piece together what God was prophesying toward the future of the earth from its very beginning.

Once one understands Day 4 of the prophecy, one will understand, perhaps for the first time in his or her life, why God made light on the first day and waited to create the "greater light" (sun) and the "lesser light" (moon) on the fourth. Remember that each of these literal days of creation are symbols of a thousand-year period to come, and look for what happened in that period of earth's history to match the prophecy, following 2 Peter 3:8.

Once one understands the meaning of Day 6 in this prophecy, and realizes that it applies to our day, one will see that this part is not yet perfectly fulfilled. Yes, there are scoffers today. The Lord's coming appears to have been delayed. But the prophecy is not yet complete; and when it is, as it will be soon, then Christ can come.

0

The answer to this depends on which prediction in 2 Peter 3:3-13 one wishes to discuss. Let me enumerate them:

  • V3, 4 - scoffers who assert uniformitarianism (as distinct from catastrophism as taught in the the Bible, eg, the flood, V5-7) - this doctrine was first officially propounded by James Hutton in the 18th century and has had significant influence ever since in scientific circles. This prediction has been fulfilled.
  • V10 - The day of the Lord or "that day" or, "last day" is a technical phrase in the NT for the second coming of Christ (Matt 24:36, Mark 13:32, Luke 10:12, 2 Tim 1:12, John 6:39, 40, 44, 54, 11:24, 12:48, Heb 6:2) and the associated judgement and resurrection. This has NOT been fulfilled.
  • V10 - heavens disappear, elements will be destroyed by fire, and the earth and its works laid bare on the "day of the Lord". This has NOT been fulfilled.
  • V13 - new heavens and a new earth (compare Rev 21) - This has NOT been fulfilled.

Thus, some of the predictions in 2 Peter 3 have been fulfilled.

0

Is there any interpretative room for the predictions of 2 Peter 3:3ff as fulfilled?

Answer: Yes, and No.

I. Yes, Peter states that scoffers will point out the delay in the Lord's return. Such scoffers have a valid point.

II. God is eternal. As you noted in the OP, "with the Lord one day is as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day" (vs. 8). This is hyperbole for the timelessness of God. It has very little to do with us, living in a world of finite time.

III. No. This is not suggesting that long delays of thousands of years "shouldn't be something to be surprised about." It is definitely something we should be surprised about! "Scoffers" would have every legitimate reason to scoff if Christ truly has not done what He promised. After all, there are over 300 instances where we are told He will return to the saints in the N/T. (Hint: We step into His Presence; He will never again set foot on earth.)

IV. Yes, there will be a day of judgement and destruction of the ungodly (vs. 7). This occurs to all the faithless at the moment of death where they are immediately condemned to Hades (in time). Their ultimate judgment occurs at the end of time, when they will be cast into the Lake of Fire (Matt. 25:41, Rev. 20:14). This is not the path of the righteous. Theirs is a detour to the end of time — metaphorically referred to as "Abraham's Bosom," paradise.

[Note: While Matthew 25:34 and 25:41 paint a picture of the sheep and the goats (presumably) together, this cannot be the case. The simple reason is that Matt. 25:34 is the same reward as that described in 1 Thessalonians 4:17 (and 2 Cor. 5:8: "absent from the body, at home with the Lord," Jas. 5:7-8, Heb. 10:25, etc.). It will be remembered that Lazarus was in "Abraham's Bosom," a metaphor for God and eternity. These two outcomes (Matt. 25:34 and 41) are utterly antithetical. The first is immediate, everlasting paradise; the second constitutes eternal condemnation and separation from God at the end of time, something the faithful will never encounter.]

V. Indeed, Christ has said that His return will be sudden and unforeseen, like a thief (in the night, vs. 10). Our individual deaths are that day! It is the day we step into His Presence, out of this world of finite time to the end of time: timelessness.

VIa. At the moment that we do this, we have "stepped to the end of time."
VIb. Yes, there will be cataclysmic events affecting the entire material universe (vss. 7, 10, 12). Everyone will witness these events.

VII. Yes, there will be "new heavens and new earth" (vs. 13). (I tend to believe that the "new earth" is an anthropomorphism that helps us understand what things will be like in the hereafter.) In my opinion, such language is merely symbolic of heaven itself.


Suppose we consider an elderly Christian named Tom. He is on the brink of death in a hospital. The next day, "like a thief in the night" death finally arrives. If we could see through Tom's eyes, he has just crossed the threshold of this world into the eternity of God.

He is standing in the immediate Presence of Christ. But, when Tom looks around, he also sees all the faithful he has ever known, right there, standing with him. And, he sees Adam and Eve (presumably saved) along with Abel, Noah, Abraham, Moses, David, Paul, you and me (if we are faithful) — all the faithful are there. Where is that? The "clouds of heaven" (1 Thess. 4:17, Acts 1:11).

This is identically the same encounter that all the faithful will have, and they will have it in the same timeless instant from their own perspectives, just like Tom. That is because there is no waiting, no passage of time as we now perceive it in our finite world.

The story of Tom is a rough depiction of how we might be able to differentiate between our world of time and the timelessness of God. It is only then that dozens of passages in Scripture begin to make sense. Otherwise, "scoffers" have every reason to scoff. This discernment is crucial if we are ever to understand the answers to these deep questions and many more like them.


Conclusion

To what extent is it possible to interpret these prophetic predictions by Peter as already historically fulfilled?

It is entirely possible to interpret these predictions if we allow ourselves to view them through the lenses of timelessness and eternity, where our current finite time ceases to exist. We can then begin to understand how all of this occurs — exactly as described. There are no contradictions or errors: Our individual death is synonymous with Christ's return, the end of time, and the destruction of all Creation.

(This response is especially challenging to convey because it is incredibly difficult to recognize the distinction between our world of time and the timelessness of God. I've answered much of this here, along with illustrations in an attempt to depict the concept.)

0

2 Pet 3 is Isaiah 34 and Isaiah 34 is a future day of the Lord chapter. We even see the Marriage Supper of the Lamb in Isaiah 34 which is the match to Isaiah 25.

1
  • 1
    As it’s currently written, your answer is unclear. Please edit to add additional details that will help others understand how this addresses the question asked. You can find more information on how to write good answers in the help center.
    – Community Bot
    Mar 20, 2023 at 21:33

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.