Acts 15:19-20 read (KJV):

Wherefore my sentence is, that we trouble not them, which from among the Gentiles are turned to God: But that we write unto them, that they abstain from pollutions of idols, and from fornication, and from things strangled, and from blood.

One commentary I have (in the Neue evangelistiche Übersetzung, which is in German, so I won't quote it directly) says these are the four requirements for gentiles living among the Israelites, and this is found in the law in Leviticus 17 and 18. And indeed, that portion surely does correspond (with a lot more detail):

  • burnt offerings and sacrifices only to be made at the sanctuary/tabernacle (otherwise it was done to the "devils")
  • blood not to be eaten, slaughtered animals to be bled out properly (because blood has a special significance in the atonement of sin)
  • meat from animals that died of themselves, or were torn, is not to be eaten
  • all manner of sexual relations that are forbidden, including but not limited to incest and bestiality

I have always wondered why these four requirements exactly were used by the apostles (and why not also for instance theft or murder), and this explanation pointing back to the basis in Mosaic law seems to make sense. But:

  1. Is Leviticus 17 & 18 the only portion of Mosaic law pertaining particularly to gentiles sojourning with Israel? (I do recall some conditional requirements, e.g. if a gentile would have wished to participate in the passover; conditional because it was not required of him to participate.)
  2. Are there other passages that could be taken as a basis for these four requirements?
  3. Is the above commentary on the right track in claiming the relationship between these two passages?

2 Answers 2


The most likely (and traditional) source for the conclusion to the first Jerusalem council is the Noahide covenant recorded in Gen 8:20 to 9:17 which was established with all humanity and all animals. Specifically, we have:

  • prohibition of eating blood (and by extension meat of strangled animals) Gen 9:1-3

Modern Jews see much more in this covenant but that is not the subject for this question. The prohibition against idolatry is also found in

  • Gen 31:32-35 – Jacob clearly understood that idolatry was forbidden.
  • Gen 35:1-4 – Jacob instructs his whole household to eliminate all foreign gods

The prohibition against fornication is found in -

  • Gen 12:10-20, 20:1-17, 26:6-11 all record “adultery narratives” in which the patriarch is (correctly) chided for almost tricking a pagan king into committing adultery
  • Gen 19 records the appalling events involving attempted pack-rape of the two angels
  • Gen 39:7-9 – Joseph calls Potiphar’s wife proposal “a great evil and sin against God”.
  • Gen 49:4 – Reuben is scalded for his sin of incest
  • Gen 34 – the story of Dinah records a heinous incident involving her defilement (plus murder and lying)

[NOTE: A similar analysis shows that all of the 10 commandments were well-known in the book of Genesis.]

Many of the moral laws of Leviticus and Numbers are based on either an expansion of one of the 10 commandments or on the Noahide law referenced above.


The suggestion that the final communique of the first Jerusalem council in Acts 15 is based on Lev 17 and 18 because these were the requirements for foreigners living in Israel is untrue for several reasons:

  1. The rules listed in Lev 17 and 18 are specifically addressed to all Israelites and foreigners and not just foreigners as V1 & 2 of each chapter clearly states
  2. The rules in Lev 17 and 18 cover the following topics: (a) the place of sacrifice; (b) laws against eating blood; (c) various sexual laws. Note that these do not cover idolatry.

As explained above, the levitial laws were a simple re-statement of the 10 commandments which existed well before Sinai.


There is extensive scholastic support for Acts 15 being derived from the laws for the stranger in Leviticus 17 and 18. See "Commentary on the New Testament Use of the Old Testament" Beale and Carson 2007. It is known that anyone with a Supersessionist perspective will go to great, and often dishonest, lengths to explain away the Mosaic foundations for many Christian doctrines. I'd like to point that discovering a link between the prohibition on eating blood and the Noahide laws are far fetched requiring hermeneutical gymnastics based on vague and unsupported implication. Secondly, idolatry is addressed in Leviticus 18. Lev 18:20 forbids worship of Molech making a clear point against idolatry.

  • 1
    Welcome to BH and thanks for your contribution. Do read the tour to get information on how this site works. If you make an assertion e.g. that so-and-so is "often dishonest" then one needs to be careful not to offend and look for ways of expressing respect for other peoples ideas even when showing what you consider to be their weaknesses. i.e. show us how they are what you claim, rather than tell us that they are that thing. I ask you to consider editing what you have put.
    – C. Stroud
    Aug 23 at 22:33

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.