Joshua 5:1-9 (NIV),
1 Now when all the Amorite kings west of the Jordan and all the Canaanite kings along the coast heard how the Lord had dried up the Jordan before the Israelites until they had crossed over, their hearts melted in fear and they no longer had the courage to face the Israelites.
2 At that time the Lord said to Joshua, “Make flint knives and circumcise the Israelites again.” 3 So Joshua made flint knives and circumcised the Israelites at Gibeath Haaraloth. 4 Now this is why he did so: All those who came out of Egypt—all the men of military age—died in the wilderness on the way after leaving Egypt. 5 All the people that came out had been circumcised, but all the people born in the wilderness during the journey from Egypt had not. 6 The Israelites had moved about in the wilderness forty years until all the men who were of military age when they left Egypt had died, since they had not obeyed the Lord. For the Lord had sworn to them that they would not see the land he had solemnly promised their ancestors to give us, a land flowing with milk and honey. 7 So he raised up their sons in their place, and these were the ones Joshua circumcised. They were still uncircumcised because they had not been circumcised on the way. 8 And after the whole nation had been circumcised, they remained where they were in camp until they were healed.
9 Then the Lord said to Joshua, “Today I have rolled away the reproach of Egypt from you.” So the place has been called Gilgal to this day.
Regarding the two portions I have emboldened above:
4 Now this is why he did so: All those who came out of Egypt—all the men of military age—died in the wilderness on the way after leaving Egypt. 5 All the people that came out had been circumcised, but all the people born in the wilderness during the journey from Egypt had not.
1.) Why did not at least and especially Moses, if not Joshua as well, insist upon the practice of circumcision for all these males who were born during the forty years in the wilderness? As one long continued narrative theoretically going back all the way to Genesis, it seems odd that the import of circumcision on the people of Israel would have been merely missed or forgotten for over four decades.
9 Then the Lord said to Joshua, “Today I have rolled away the reproach of Egypt from you.”
2.) Why did it take so long--over forty years--for the reproach of Egypt to be rolled off of Israel? Why did it have to wait until the eve of the conquest of Canaan? Could it not have been achieved any earlier?