Hi I am studying the use of the nominative and especially looking at the subject-predicate nominative constructions. I read the following in Matt 6:22:

Matthew 6:22 (UBS5): Ὁ λύχνος τοῦ σώματός ἐστιν ὁ ὀφθαλμός

Why is this translated in the ESV as:

Matthew 6:22 (ESV): The eye is the lamp of the body.

And not:

The lamp of the body is the eye

Ie why is the ‘the lamp’ not the subject in this sentence? And what is the semantic relationship between the two (e.g. subsets preposition, convertible preposition, something else)? If it is a convertible preposition - then what importance does the word order of the Greek have on the meaning?

When I compare it to:

1 John 2:7 (UBS5): ἡ ἐντολὴ ἡ παλαιά ἐστιν ὁ λόγος ὃν ἠκούσατε.

Which is translated by ESV (as I would expect):

1 John 2:7 (ESV): but an old commandment that you had from the beginning

Where ‘old commandment’ seems to be the subject based on my understanding.

Thanks in advance.


The best reference for such a discussion is Daniel B Wallace, Greek Grammar Beyond the Basics" (Zondervan), known in theological traps as "BBGG". It is indispensable!

GGBB has a whole section devoted to this matter beginning on page 40.

In Matt 6:22 we essentially have Ὁ λύχνος τοῦ σώματός ἐστιν ὁ ὀφθαλμός.

Now, if I strip out the qualifier, then we are left with Ὁ λύχνος ἐστιν ὁ ὀφθαλμός. In this case we have two nouns, both articular, both nominative case, connected by the verb to be. This is a classic convertible proposition so it could be translated as either (see GGBB page 45):

  • The lamp is the eye, or
  • The eye is the lamp

The selection is a matter of taste and convention.

In 1 John 2:7 we have ἡ ἐντολὴ ἡ παλαιά ἐστιν ὁ λόγος ὃν ἠκούσατε. Again, stripped of the qualifiers,, we have ἡ ἐντολὴ ἐστιν ὁ λόγος. Again, two nouns, both articular and both nominative case so we have a convertible proposition which can be translated as either:

  • the commandment is the word, or,
  • the word is the commandment

The translation preferred is what makes sense in the context - probably the former in this case. GGBB quotes several other such examples including: Matt 13:55, John 15:1, etc.

  • Thanks for that just the book I am using and Matt is one of the examples stated but not explained and I was wondering whether my interpretation was correct and what the word order meant. Re word order - the books does mention it matters in as much as a different question is answered by “Michael Jordan is the best player in history” vs “the best player in history is Michael Jordan” (example in book) – user7289 Jan 23 at 20:42

Naming such syntax as convertible propositions and saying that the selection is a matter of taste and convention, does not help us much in understanding the meaning of the passage. I am giving a different answer than what you asked for, but it might be of interest to some people.

I discussed this passage in the article "The eye is the lamp of the body".

If we talk about semantics and the meaning of the metaphors of eye, body and lamp, we need to recognize that Greek puts the most prominent word first (English usually puts it last). The focus is on spiritual light, represented by the illustration of a lamp. Another aspect is whether a person is open to allow that spiritual light to enter his mind (Hebrew would say his heart) or whether he blocks it. It is easier to see this if we look at the whole passage:

Ὁ λύχνος τοῦ σώματός ἐστιν ὁ ὀφθαλμός. ἐὰν οὖν ᾖ ὁ ὀφθαλμός σου ἁπλοῦς, ὅλον τὸ σῶμά σου φωτεινὸν ἔσται· ἐὰν δὲ ὁ ὀφθαλμός σου πονηρὸς ᾖ, ὅλον τὸ σῶμά σου σκοτεινὸν ἔσται. εἰ οὖν τὸ φῶς τὸ ἐν σοὶ σκότος ἐστίν, τὸ σκότος πόσον.

The lamp/light of the body is the eye. So, if your eye might be single, your whole body will be shining (have light). But if your eye might be bad, your whole body will be dark. So if the light that is in you is darkness, what great darkness!

Hebrew often uses a chiasm where the beginning (Ὁ λύχνος τοῦ σώματός) and end (τὸ φῶς τὸ ἐν σοὶ) go together. In the center we have the contrast between a single and a bad eye. To show this, I prefer to translate the first word as light rather than lamp as even KJV does. The eye here is like a window into the inner person. It stands for an attitude of mind. If you are singleminded (ἁπλοῦς) in the positive sense of being focused on Jesus and the light he brings, then your will have spiritual light inside you. But if your "eye" is bad, that is, your mind is unfocused or focused on wrong things, then you are not allowing the light of Jesus to enter your mind.

It is very difficult to get that meaning across in a literal translation. My own idiomatic translation (The Bible in Everyday Danish - Bibelen på Hverdagsdansk, first published in 2007) is here:

Øjet er som en lampe, der bringer lys til dit indre. Hvis du har et åbent og oprigtigt sind, vil dit indre fyldes af mit lys. Men hvis du har et lukket og ondt sind, vil dit indre fyldes af mørke. Pas på ikke at lukke af for mit lys, for så bliver dit liv ét stort mørke.

Let me give it in English:

The eye is like a lamp that brings light to your inner being. If you have an open and sincere mind, your inner being will be filled by my light. But if you have a closed and evil mind, your inner being will be filled with darkness. Beware not to close out my light, for then your life will be one big darkness.

There are a few very free translations in English that also try to communicate the meaning as best they can. I am not too fond of any of them, but let me quote them anyway:

“The eyes of your spirit allow revelation-light to enter into your being. If your heart is unclouded, the light floods in! But if your eyes are focused on money, the light cannot penetrate and darkness takes its place. How profound will be the darkness within you if the light of truth cannot enter! (Passion translation.)

“Your eyes are windows into your body. If you open your eyes wide in wonder and belief, your body fills up with light. If you live squinty-eyed in greed and distrust, your body is a musty cellar. If you pull the blinds on your windows, what a dark life you will have! (The Message)

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.