Did Solomon have 4k or 40k horses (or stalls for horses)?

2 Chronicles 9:25. And Solomon had four thousand stalls for horses and chariots, and twelve thousand horsemen; whom he bestowed in the chariot cities, and with the king at Jerusalem.

1 Kings 4:26. And Solomon had forty thousand stalls of horses for his chariots, and twelve thousand horsemen.

  • Bill you do have an eye for this 馃槀 thank you for the contributions, i personally like them a lot (+1). Jan 12, 2021 at 8:16

3 Answers 3


LXX and Chron both have 4,000. (c.f. 3 Kingdoms 10.29). Given that 40K seems too high and there is both a variant text and a second witness to 4K, I'd guess this is a scribal error in the MT 1 Ki and we should assume that 讗址专职讘址旨注址转蜘 "arbath" was erroneously copied as the very similar looking (讗址专职讘指旨注执芝讬诐) "arbaim鈥 and thus "four" became "forty".

The difference between the two words is solely the yod and whether there is a square box for the final mem or a 3 sided box for the tav. Perhaps a smudge filled that bottom line in that last letter, or the line was damaged.


A simple evaluation of the texts and a practical understanding of what the texts describe could make for a very realistic understanding...

The words and and for are also two different words.

  • Horses and chariots = 4k
  • Horses for Chariots = 40k

Consider this in modern terms...

  • 1 tank = 10 soldiers

So, this could mean...

  • 1 horse and 1 chariot hitched
  • 10 horses total ready for duty if a fellow horse is killed
  • This answer provides some good insight, merely by reviewing what is already in front of us, but it needed more explanation and some styling so that the point could be read. I added that. Welcome to the site!
    – Jesse
    Aug 15, 2023 at 16:04

To support Robert's answer, I quote Pulpit Commentary:

Verse 26. - And Solomon had forty thousand stalls of horses [40,000 is certainly a clerical error, probably for 4000 (i.e., 讗址专职讘旨指讬注讬诐 for 讗址专职讘旨指注指讛). For

(1) in the parallel passage in Chronicles the number is stated as 4000.

(2) 4000 agrees, and 40,000 does not, with the other numbers here given.

Your Answer

By clicking 鈥淧ost Your Answer鈥, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.