Genesis 5:3 NIV
When Adam had lived 130 years, he had a son in his own likeness, in his own image; and he named him Seth.
Are we not born and created in the image and likeness of Adam?
Biblical Hermeneutics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professors, theologians, and those interested in exegetical analysis of biblical texts. It only takes a minute to sign up.
Sign up to join this communityGenesis 5:3 NIV
When Adam had lived 130 years, he had a son in his own likeness, in his own image; and he named him Seth.
Are we not born and created in the image and likeness of Adam?
That mankind was created in the image of God is recorded several times in the Bible such as: Gen 1:27, 5:1, 9:6, etc.
The original intention was that this image of God was to have been inherited by each successive generation, but that image was marred and we now inherit a fallen, sinful nature (Rom 3:10-18, 5, 12, 15, etc.)
However, it is one of the functions of God's plan of salvation that the image of God is to be restored by the mechanism of beholding Christ, as shown by the following references:
Again, one of the purposes of the incarnation was to provide Jesus, the perfect representation of God to man so that man can me imitators of Christ and have the image of God restored in mankind.
The doctrine of the imitation of Christ is very deeply embedded in the NT as the method by which the image of God is restored in mankind.
... and so forth.
Genesis Rabbah 23:6 notes that Genesis 4 ends with Enosh (and that only in the next chapter does it continue with the subsequent generations), and also that I Chron. 1:1 lists only those three generations (and again, the subsequent generations are listed only in the following verses). Based on this, then, it says (translation mine):
Up to this point [when Enosh was born] they were "in the [divine] image and form"; thereafter the generations deteriorated, and they were created as kentorin... their faces became like those of apes.
(Kentorin may mean "centaurs" - i.e., creatures halfway between human and animal - though a number of the commentaries there relate it to an Aramaic root meaning "reversed.")
Which would mean, then, that the answer to the OP's question would be: not fully (although, as per Genesis 9:6 cited by Dottard, we still retain it to a certain degree, distinguishing us from other forms of life).