3

2 Chronicles 1:12 I will also give you wealth, possessions and honor, such as no king who was before you ever had and none after you will have.

Does this comparison apply narrowly only to local kings or broadly to all the kings of the world for all time? Was Solomon the richest person ever?

2 Chronicles 9:22 King Solomon was greater in riches and wisdom than all the other kings of the earth.

1
  • 1
    The addition of the words 'was before you' may imply 'who preceded you' in the sense of the royal line from David. In which case only David (arguably, also Saul) may be included in the 'before' category. – Nigel J Jun 24 '20 at 10:27
0

First, we do not know exactly how rich Solomon was. And even if we did, comparisons with those who have reigned since, even into modern times, are fraught with difficulties due to inflation, vast differences in economies (agrarian vs, say industrial, etc) and the way wealth was counted and evaluated.

It is also difficult to know on what basis Solomon was regarded as wealthy: Was he wealthy compared to the average citizen; or, Did he own a significant part of the total wealth of the land such as farmland, or gold, silver or just land and cattle, (eg, Job) etc, etc? There are many ways to measure wealth.

That Solomon was vastly wealthy is beyond dispute on almost any basis, even if direct comparisons with other monarchs are impossible.

However, it is possible to make a few remarks about the two quoted texts:

  • 2 Chron 1:12 says that Solomon was richer than the kings before him and after him. If this refers to all the kings of Israel and Judah, then the statement is not difficult to believe.
  • 2 Chron 9:22 says that Solomon was richer than all the other kings of the earth. If this refers to all the kings of the earth that were (at least approximately) contemporary with Solomon, then, again, it is not difficult to believe.

How much more than this we can say, is not known. The language is very carefully worded and is significant for what it does not say. For example, it does not say that Solomon would live the longest (there were others that lived and reigned longer); and, it does not say that Solomon was the richest king who ever lived.

CONCLUSION

Therefore, to be safe and conservative, it better to confine one's understanding to above two statements.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.