2

Matthew 5:39 But I tell you, do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other cheek also.

John 18:23 “If I said something wrong,” Jesus replied, “testify as to what is wrong. But if I spoke the truth, why did you strike me?”

But I tell you, do not resist an evil person.

3
  • Turning one's head, and being silent, are two completely different things.
    – Lucian
    May 30 '20 at 20:13
  • 1
    It's one thing for someone to slap an equal without just cause, and best to be ignored by proferring the other cheek. It's quite another for a religious ruler, who has convened a Court, to request an Officer of that Court to strike a defendant during a judicial process of questioning. You have not explained why there is a need to 'reconcile' anything. That should have been part of your question.
    – Nigel J
    May 30 '20 at 22:17
  • 1
    I agree with @NigelJ. There is a huge difference between an everyday tort (civil wrong that causes loss or harm, metaphorical cheek slap) and the abuse of the process of jurisprudence in court.
    – Dottard
    May 30 '20 at 23:01
2

V38 that precedes Matt. 5:39 has:

“You have heard that it was said, ‘An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth.’ (Matt. 5:38, ESV)

Thus, the context of Matt. 5:39 is retaliation or vengeance. In John 28:23 Jesus is not retaliating. He is arguing his case. He is also getting the officer to think about his action.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.