3

[Deu 23:15-16 NLT] (15) "If slaves should escape from their masters and take refuge with you, you must not hand them over to their masters. (16) Let them live among you in any town they choose, and do not oppress them.

[Phm 1:12 NLT] (12) I am sending him back to you, and with him comes my own heart.

  • 2
    I think the pertinent notion in the Deuteronomy text relates to "taking refuge", i.e. this was a built-in protection for slaves against oppressive masters (unheard of in any other culture). Oppression was not to be tolerated in Israel. Unwritten, is the obvious need for checking the legitimacy of a slave's claim of oppression. – enegue Mar 2 at 7:02
  • The important aspect, in my own view, would be whether Onesimus was returning willingly, albeit at the behest of Paul. My understanding of the the epistle is that Onesimus had left service in unbelief but was returning in faith, and was being commended by Paul who wished to pave the way for a reconciliation between Onesimus and Philemon, on the basis of Christian fellowship. I don't think Jewish Law is relevant, here. – Nigel J Mar 2 at 18:22
  • 1
    @NigelJ Okay, thanks. At this point I have not formed an opinion on what to make of the situation. – Ruminator Mar 2 at 18:27
  • @NigelJ The Law is certainly relevant if Paul discovered that Onesimus was a runaway slave who had no valid claim concerning oppression, in which case he was obliged to return him. – enegue Mar 4 at 8:49
  • @enegue Is Onesimus Jewish (with a Latin name ?). Is Philemon Jewish ? What is the Roman Law ? Paul refers to no Laws in the epistle. He refers only to the faith of Philemon and the faith of Onesimus. – Nigel J Mar 4 at 9:14
0

Paul and Onesimus had a new relationship, by Onesimus' [eternal] rebirth. Philemon and Onesimus also were now brothers, so are the sending and keeping in that context? Onesimus evidently chose, whether returning or staying. Nor had he taken refuge with Paul, unless...are you thinking Roman citizens who were prisoners had input or authority on what to do with captured slaves?

| improve this answer | |
  • If you find that Roman law is a factor here that would be helpful research and earn a +1. – Ruminator Mar 2 at 7:28
  • well for sure it's not Jewish law that either Paul or Philemon or Onesimus or the Roman jail or Caesar are bound by – Walter S Mar 2 at 19:23

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.