3

In Mark 3:1-6, Jesus goes into a synagogue where there is a man with a shriveled hand and the Pharisees are watching to see if he will heal on the Sabbath. Jesus then

Then Jesus asked them, "Which is lawful on the Sabbath: to do good or to do evil, to save life or to kill?" But they remained silent.

Mark 3:4 (NIV emphasis mine)

Presumably the phrase "to kill" alludes to the fact that they are about to go on the Sabbath plot to kill Jesus (v. 6), but why does Jesus frame his own activity as saving a life? The man has a shriveled hand, but he doesn't seem in any kind of mortal danger. Is this just a hyperbole or is it somehow fitting in describing his action so?

1

Barnes observes in commenting on Mark 3:4 -

It seems to have been a maxim with the Jews that not to do good when we have an opportunity is to do evil; not to save life is to kill or to be guilty of murder. If a man has an opportunity of saving a man's life when he is in danger, and does not do it, he is evidently guilty of his death.

Thus, when Jesus asked the question, to which the Jewish maxim was the obvious and unavoidable answer, "Which is lawful on the Sabbath: to do good or to do evil, to save life or to kill?" they remained silent; precisely because to answer would have betrayed their duplicity; the Jews were plotting to kill Jesus. Thus, to answer, "to kill life" would have made them guilty of disregarding the Torah; to answer "to save life" would make them guilty of the death of Jesus whom they wanted to kill for saving life.

By this ingenious question Jesus exposed what happens to people who, though punctilious about keeping the law actually end up breaking the law, in this case the Sabbath.

Jesus' question is a classic case of argument from the greater to the lesser. If the Jews were willing, on the sabbath, to rescue an animal or person from danger and death, surely the lesser act of healing a person would not be a crime on the Sabbath.

Secondly, while the Jews were willing to save an animal from danger and death on the Sabbath, they were quite willing to plan Jesus' death on the Sabbath!

Thus, they remained silent and Jesus was both angry and sad (Mark 3:5). Their silence was also significant. As Matthew Henry observes:

But stubborn infidels, when they can say nothing against the truth, yet will not yield.

Thus, the Jews condemned themselves.

| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.