In Ruth 3,4 it is written:

When he gets ready to go to sleep, take careful notice of the place where he lies down. Then go, uncover his legs, and lie down beside him. He will tell you what you should do.”

(see also Ruth 3,7)

I don't understand the action of uncovering his legs/feet and lying down beside him.

What exactly does that gesture mean in that time and age?

My own interpretations options with my limited experience:

  • This gesture a proclamation of interest in Boas. However, the way she does it is weird.
  • This gesture also has a sexual note because of the uncovering of the legs. However, considering the strict view on marriage in that time makes this interpretation questionable for me.
  • An act of total submission. While it makes sense for the lying down part, I am still confused on the uncovering of the legs/feet part. Was the uncovering of legs/feet while sleeping important for the submission?

Thank you for your help.


What does the Gesture of “uncovering feet” and “laying to Boas feet” mean?

What exactly does that gesture mean in that time and age?

According to the footnotes, Ruth 3:4 NET Bible, the actions of Ruth constitute a marriage proposal,which read.

While Ruth and Boaz did not actually have a sexual encounter at the threshing floor, there is no doubt that Ruth’s actions are symbolic and constitute a marriage proposal.

Ruth 3 :3-4, 10-13(NET Bible)

Boaz will redeem Ruth.

3 "At that time, Naomi, her mother-in-law, said to her, “My daughter, I must find a home for you so you will be secure.[b] 2 Now Boaz, with whose female servants you worked, is our close relative.[c] Look, tonight he is winnowing barley at the threshing floor.[d] 3 So bathe yourself,[e] rub on some perfumed oil,[f] and get dressed up. Then go down[h] to the threshing floor. But don’t let the man know you’re there until he finishes his meal.[i] 4 When he gets ready to go to sleep, take careful notice of the place where he lies down. Then go, uncover his legs,[k] and lie down[l] beside him.[m] He will tell[n] you what you should do.” 5 Ruth replied to Naomi,[o] “I will do everything you have told[p] me to do.”

10" He said, “May you be rewarded[ah] by the Lord, my dear![ai] This act of devotion[aj] is greater than what you did before.[ak] For you have not sought to marry[al] one of the young men, whether rich or poor.[am] 11 Now, my dear, don’t worry![an] I intend to do for you everything you propose,[ao] for everyone in the village[ap] knows that you are a worthy woman.[aq] 12 Now yes, it is true that[ar] I am a guardian,[as] but there is another guardian who is a closer relative than I am. 13 Remain here tonight. Then in the morning, if he agrees to marry you,[at] fine,[au] let him do so.[av] But if he does not want to do so, I promise, as surely as the Lord lives, to marry you.[aw] Sleep here until morning.”"

| improve this answer | |
  • Interesting. I read a German Translation where the word "marriage" only occurred later in chapter 4. While I understood the outcome, I don't understand why she did it in this specific way. I mean if I would like to propose to somebody even in the position of Naomi and Ruth I don't come to the conclusion to wait for him to sleep and then uncover his feet. I mean it would be much simpler if the Bible said something like: And Ruth went to Boaz and proposed to him. However, this specific way of uncovering the feet is repeated. Which makes me wonder... but maybe I read to much into it. – telion Feb 1 at 16:56
  • @ telion I also find it very strange, the world then, and today has change traumatically. – Ozzie Ozzie Feb 1 at 20:38
  • If feet are not manifest, and then are manifest : and then redemption occurs . . . . . how beautiful are those feet, the feet of them that publish glad tidings . . . . (+1) – Nigel J Feb 2 at 14:01
  • @NigelJ I'm sorry but I really don't understand where you are getting at and what it has to do with Ruth and Boaz in this particular situation. Also is this a reference? Google indicates that Isaiah 52:7 has parts of this. Or is this an encouragement to evangelize/? – telion Feb 2 at 17:27

The Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Bible Commentary correctly observes:

Boaz probably slept upon a mat or skin; Ruth lay crosswise at his feet—a position in which Eastern servants frequently sleep in the same chamber or tent with their master; and if they want a covering, custom allows them that benefit from part of the covering on their master's bed. Resting, as the Orientals do at night, in the same clothes they wear during the day, there was no indelicacy in a stranger, or even a woman, putting the extremity of this cover over her.

The Pulpit commentary ventures the following opinion:

Naomi ventured, on a bold expedient to bring speedy rest to her daughter-in-law. But we assume that, with unmistaking feminine intuition, she saw, on the one hand, that Boaz was already deeply attached to Ruth, and, on the other, that Ruth reciprocated his attachment with pure intensity. Most probably we should also assume that she detected in Boaz a peculiar diffidence that caused him to shrink from making decisive advances in the way of declaring his affection. He had, however, unconsciously revealed himself, and made it clear to Naomi that he wished to divulge in words the depth of his honorable feelings. But again and again, as we may suppose, his sensitiveness overcame his resolutions. Hence Naomi's scheme to bring him to the point of declaration. It would have been reprehensible in the extreme had she not been absolutely certain of his wishes, on the one hand, and of his perfect honor and un-contaminable purity on the other. And even with that qualification, the scheme would have been imprudent and improper, and utterly unfeminine, had it not been the case that, in virtue of an ancient and much-prized Hebrew law, Ruth was entitled to call upon her nearest of kin to fulfill the various duties of a responsible kinsman. Still, notwithstanding the existence of this law, we may rest assured that the sensitive gleaner would never have summoned up courage to ask Boaz to discharge to her the duties of kinship, unless she had been sure that the thrills that vibrated within her own heart were responsive to subtle touches, on his part, of spirit with spirit.

Thus, Ruth's actions amounted to a marriage proposal under the well-known provision of Hebrew law of the kinsman redeemer. See Lev 25:25 etc.

| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.