The word "life" appears in most translations of John 12:25 three times. For example, in the ESV:

Whoever loves his life loses it, and whoever hates his life in this world will keep it for eternal life.

However, the Greek (SBL) uses two different words for these three instances:

ὁ φιλῶν τὴν ψυχὴν αὐτοῦ ἀπολλύει αὐτήν, καὶ ὁ μισῶν τὴν ψυχὴν αὐτοῦ ἐν τῷ κόσμῳ τούτῳ εἰς ζωὴν αἰώνιον φυλάξει αὐτήν.

Obviously ζωὴ carries a theological weight that ψυχὴ does not in John's gospel, but I'm curious how they are used outside of it. Is "life" an appropriate translation for both? Are they essentially synonymous? Are there differences in their connotation?

  • I would be interested to see how what each words translates in the Septuagint and if that shows a helpful pattern. – Frank Luke Mar 8 '13 at 20:56
  • Soldamal - (A.) Could you clarify if you are asking "philosophically, and in general", or specifically how THIS writer, JOHN, uses these terms? It is very dependent dependent on the author. (B.) For example, "life / ζωὴ" is an attribute/quality that a Soul may possess: Rev. 16:3 - καὶ πᾶσα ψυχὴ ζωῆς, [living soul] ἀπέθανεν; (C.) Heb. 4:12 presupposes there is a very fine line between "soul and spirit"; In other places, Spirit precedes Life, which a soul can have; (D.) Aristotle and others go to great lengths to make distinctions -- none of which are consistent; – elika kohen Nov 24 '15 at 0:22

A word study that organizes how many different English translations for the word, and in what frequency splices the difference up fairly reasonably:

ψυχὴ is translated in many ways. Here in descending order. In other words mostly soul, souls, or life, lives:

soul, souls, life, lives, living, person, persons, mind, minds, being, me

ζωὴ is only translated three ways:

life, living, lifetime

According to Kittel, ψυχὴ is related to "ψύχω “to blow (to cool)” and ψῦχος “cold,” is on this view the vital force which resides in the members and which comes to expression especially in the breath." When you breath your last, you lose it.

On the other hand "ζωή (ζῆν) denotes in Greek the physical vitality of organic beings, animals, men and also plants. Life is understood, not as a thing, but as vitality, as the nature or manner which characterizes all living creatures as such. Hence ζωή cannot be used in the plural."

Conclusion: ψυχὴ is more or less 'our' life. ζωὴ is life itself.

| improve this answer | |

Question Restatement

What distinctions does "John", (and other New Testament writers), make between the terms, "ζωὴ, (Life)" and "ψυχὴ, (Soul)"?


There are a /lot/ of texts regarding these philosophical concepts. Aristotle, Plato, the Hebrew Scriptures, different authors in the New Testament, etc.

So, this is just about "John" and "other New Testament writers" -- a "Common Denominator", and evidently consistent ...


The Verse in Question, (John 12:25), is presented last, and actually the conclusion ...

This answer avoids the "contested" properties in order to highlight the "concrete" qualities, affirmed in different contexts.

Life, (ζωὴ) - is a "Property", an Attribute of "Soul":

Rev. 16:3, NASB -

The second angel poured out his bowl into the sea, and it became blood like that of a dead man; and every living thing,[lit. Living Soul, from: ψυχὴ ζωῆς] in the sea died.

Life, (ζωὴ) - is Quantifiable, Can be Increased, Diminished, and Measured:

John 10:10, NASB -

The thief comes only to steal and kill and destroy; I came that they may have life, and have it abundantly.

Just because a "Human Soul" ceases to live / ζωὴ -- they do not become any "less human".

Life, (ζωὴ) - is Subject to the Natural; the Soul is Subject to the Transcendent:

Matt. 10:28, NASB -

Do not fear those who kill the body but are unable to kill the soul; but rather fear Him who is able to destroy both soul and body in hell.

The Soul, (ψυχὴ) - is the Seat of Human Will:

Surrendering the Soul, is the ultimate expression of surrender, not simply dying.

John 12:27 - NASB-

Now My soul, [ψυχή] has become troubled;

Rev. 12:11, NASB -

"And they overcame him because of the blood of the Lamb and because of the word of their testimony, and they did not love their *[life, ψυχὴν -- actually Soul] even when faced with death.

The Soul, (ψυχὴν) - is to be the Focus, and Safeguarded -- "Life" follows Consequently:

John 12:25, NASB -

He who loves his life, [lit. Soul, from ψυχὴν] loses it, and he who hates his life, [lit. Soul, from ψυχὴν] in this world will KEEP, [lit. Guard / Protect, from: φυλάξει] - it, [the Soul] - to life, [from ζωὴν] eternal.

The word "Keep / φυλάξει" - is certainly an ambiguous translation -- but literally denotes "to protect and safeguard" -- not to "keep or retain".

This is not about "staying alive" -- by avoiding death.

This is about safeguarding the Soul.

According to the texts, by submitting "the Will", (even hating the inclinations of the Soul) -- the Soul can be safeguarded, and thereby enter into eternal life.

| improve this answer | |

Please identify any glaring errors in an edifying manner.

John 12:25

ο | φιλων | την | ψυχην | αυτου | απολεσει | αυτην
he | befriending | the | soul | of his | will lose | it
και | ο | μισων | την | ψυχην | αυτου | εν | τω
and | he | destesting | the | soul | of his | in | the
κοσμω | τουτω | εις | ζωην | αιωνιον | φυλαξει | αυτην
world | this (one) | into | life | eternal | will keep | it


He who loves his soul, will lose it, and he who hates his soul in this world, into eternal life, will keep it.

The use of soul (ψυχὴν) and life (ζωην) comes from Genesis 2:7, where we are told:

και | εγενετο | ο | ανθρωπος | εις | ψυχην | ζωσαν
and | became | the | man | into | soul | living

and the man became a living soul

The usage of ψυχην in Genesis 2:7, unambiguously informs us that a soul is what the man (Adam) IS, not what he HAS. A "soul" is collection of atoms, the fundamental elements of the ground, which God fashioned and gave form (shape) - a body, that which Jesus refers to as flesh (see below).

The usage of ζωσαν in Genesis 2:7, unambiguously informs us that, prior to God breathing into his nostrils, Adam was a lifeless body, but afterwards, he "became into", was transformed into, a living soul - a human being/a person.

Jesus says:

John 6:63

το | πνευμα | εστιν | το | ζωοποιουν | η | σαρξ
The | breath | it is | the | livingness | the | flesh
ουκ | ωφελει | ουδεν | τα | ρηματα | α | εγω
not | profits | nothing | the | words | that | I
λελαληκα | υμιν | πνευμα | εστιν | και | ζωη | εστιν
have spoken | you(s) | breath | they are | and | life | they are

The spirit is that which brings life, the flesh profits nothing. The words that I have spoken to you, they spirit and they are life.

Jesus identifies two aspects of being, here: ζωην (1. life), which is imparted by means of the πνευμα (breath) of God to the σαρξ (2. flesh), and the flesh is of no profit - it might as well not have been animated at all - unless his words breathe life into it anew.


ψυχὴν and ζωην are not synonymous, they are two distinct aspects of being. ψυχὴν (soul) is a collection of atoms - a body, or flesh as Jesus refers to it. ζωην (life) is imparted by means of the πνευμα (breath) of God, transforming the body into a living body - one that is self-moving. How self-movement works is a subject that requires a different question.

In English, "person" is probably the best word to use for what Genesis 2:7 refers to as "a living soul".

| improve this answer | |
  • 4
    Glaringly wrong is the methodology employed here. This site is more about methods and the process of applying interpretation techniques than it is about specific conclusions. Even wrong-conclusions are sometimes up-vote worthy if they teach something useful about methodology. This is the opposite of that. Parsing an interlinear Bible is simply not the tool for this job. You really need to learn the limitations of —and appropriate applications for— the available tools so you don't end up in a broken hermeneutic circle. – Caleb Nov 22 '15 at 13:30
  • @Caleb I have shown what the difference is between the words ψυχὴν and ζωην, so my answer addresses the question. If you have something different to say, then answer the question yourself and let the readers decide which answer is best. Your comment is inappropriate and simply a justification for the poor form of you comrades, which makes it very poor form for you. – enegue Nov 22 '15 at 18:46

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.