I noticed a phraseology in the King James Version of the bible that is strange to a modern English speaker. It involves two forms of the same word in close proximity in a sentence. Before posting this question I found quite a few examples using a regex search*. I would like to know the following:

  • Does this pattern have a specific name (apart from Pleonasm, which encompass other redundancies)?
  • What is the origin of the pattern - is it typical Hebrew or Greek or is it a phraseology inserted by the 15th century translators?



  • 37:10 What is this dream that thou hast dreamed?
  • 48:15 let my name be named on them
  • 49:25 and by the Almighty, who shall bless thee with blessings


  • 28:17 And thou shalt set in it settings of stones
  • 29:5 and gird him with the curious girdle of the ephod
  • 29:9 And thou shalt gird them with girdles
  • 35:24 Every one that did offer an offering of silver and brass brought the LORD's offering


  • 2:1 And when any will offer a meat offering unto the LORD
  • 4:27 for his sin which he hath sinned.
  • 7:13 Besides the cakes, he shall offer for his offering leavened bread
  • 20:2 the people of the land shall stone him with stones.
  • 26:40 with their trespass which they trespassed against me


  • 4:7 and cover the same with a covering of badgers' skins
  • 6:21 according to the vow which he vowed

...skipping to New Testemant


  • 2:32 A light to lighten the Gentiles
  • 22:15 And he said unto them, With desire I have desired to eat this passover with you before I suffer


  • 5:32 I know that the witness which he witnesseth of me is true.
  • 9:4 I must work the works of him that sent me


  • 3:11 According to the eternal purpose which he purposed in Christ Jesus our Lord


  • 1:18 that thou by them mightest war a good warfare;

*For those interested, the helper regex I used was (\b(?!the)\w{5,12})\b [\s\S]{2,20} \1\w{2,5}\b

2 Answers 2


In the contemporary literature this is referred to with several terms: cognate object (construction); internal object; cognate accusative; internal accusative. It is a common construction across the Semitic language family, as it is attested in many West Semitic languages (like Hebrew, Aramaic and Arabic) but also in East Semitic; for example, in the Akkadian Code of Hammurabi we have (§5): šumma dayānum dīnam idīn "if a judge 'judges' a judgment" (i.e., pronounces a judgment).

What seems to be new (or at least more fully developed) in various West Semitic languages, however, is the use of this expression with adjectives specifying the cognate noun. Thus, in Gen. 1:20 we have יִשְׁרְצוּ הַמַּיִם שֶׁרֶץ נֶפֶשׁ חַיָּה yišrəṣū hammayīm šereṣ nepeš ḥayyāh "let the waters bring forth living creatures" (where to bring forth and creature are from the same root in Hebrew). New here is that the cognate noun (creatures) is further specialized by the adjective living (lit. "of a living breath/soul").

This kind of construction can then be used for adverbial expressions. Thus, where we may ask "have you dreamt well?", Hebrew etc. would use "have you dreamt a good dream?". In this respect it is noteworthy that the Semitic languages that have an adverbial ending (like English -ly: Akkadian -iš; Syriac -ā'īt) do not use cognate object constructions this way, but that it is found in several languages that do not have productive adverbial endings (like Hebrew and Jewish Palestinian Aramaic).

When the noun in a cognate object construction is not specified further, the construction may simply be used to shift the focus from the event to the object or to lend the text a certain literary style.

Because the construction is so old, its origins are unfortunately unclear. It is however perfectly imaginable that it was first used in cases where no variation between verb and noun was possible (when there is no close enough synonym), or that it was used for emphasis (especially because such constructions lead to alliteration, like in English do a deed).

As for Greek, it is possible that these constructions were calqued into Greek with the Septuagint and thus ended up in the New Testament, but it is also possible that they developed independently in Indo-European or were borrowed at an earlier stage of contact—I wouldn't know about this.

Since you have some background in programming: instead of using a regex, you could also use a treebank query. That kind of query can search for specific syntactic constructions using a database of the text where everything has been tagged. For the Hebrew Bible, you can use SHEBANQ, but unfortunately you have to create an account to run a query (it is free, though). To find cognate object constructions you could use something like:

select all objects where
  [word as mainverb focus sp=verb]
  [phrase function=Objc
    [word focus lex0=mainverb.lex0]

This searches for all clauses with a word with sp (part of speech) verb followed by an object phrase containing a word with the same base lexeme as the verb.


Bullinger designates such a figure of speech as “polyptoton.”1

enter image description here

He categorizes the variety of polyptoton that occur in the Bible.

enter image description here

Examples like the ones you quoted are discussed in section “3. Verbs with cognate noun.”

enter image description here

One example of such is Genesis 28:20: “And Jacob vowed a vow.”

enter image description here

The origin is obviously Hebrew, with respect to the Bible, since the English translators were simply translating into English the polyptotons that were already present in the Hebrew text. However, polyptoton didn’t only occur in the Bible. Polyptoton was also used by authors of other cultures. As Bullinger suggests, it may have been used by the Hebrew authors for emphasis.

The same figure of speech is designated by Julius Rufinianus as Greek Παρηγμένον or Latin derivatio.

Halm, Karl Felix. Rhetores Latini Minores. pp. 51–52, §16

The quotes cited by Rufinianus include:

  • Vergil’s Aeneid, 5.446: ultro ipse gravis graviterque ad terram pondere vasto concidit
  • id., 12.640: oppetere ingentem atque ingenti volnere (vulnere) victum
  • id., 6.247: voce vocans (vocat) Hecaten
  • Vergil’s Georgicon, 4.108: ire iter aut (et) castris audebit vellere signa


1 Bullinger, pp. 267–285
2 Halm, pp. 51–52, §16


Bullinger, Ethelbert William. Figures of Speech Used in the Bible: Explained and Illustrated. London: Messrs; New York: Messrs, 1898.

Rhetores Latini Minores. Ed. Halm, Karl Felix. Vol. 1–2. Leipzig: Teubner, 1863.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.