In 1 Kings 19 we see Elijah finds Elisha plowing with 12 yoke of oxen. What would this have said about Elisha to the people of the time?

Note: I'm not looking for a modern allegorical answer about the significance of the 12 yoke of oxen, but for an understanding of how Elisha would have been perceived at the time based on this information (though if the people of the time would have understood it allegorically, that is OK)

  • Do you mean in terms of socioeconomic status?
    – Soldarnal
    Commented Feb 22, 2013 at 22:46
  • 1
    That he came from a wealthy family with a whole lot of oxen?
    – user947
    Commented Feb 23, 2013 at 2:24
  • @Soldarnal I mean how the people of the time would have understood it. Would they have just thought "he's from a rich family", or are there other connotations. Perhaps plowing with 12 yoke of oxen was today's equivalent of extreme tractor racing or something?
    – cdjc
    Commented Feb 23, 2013 at 19:00
  • 3
    When you say "I'm not looking for an allegorical answer" do you mean you don't want modern allegory read back into the passage or are you trying to exclude any argument that the 12 oxen would have been understood allegorically at the time? Commented Sep 13, 2013 at 12:14
  • 2
    Updated to clarify my intentions. I was trying to discourage the sort of vague answers that go on about the significance of the number 12 and drawing conclusions thereupon based on the connections that seem to only be well-defined in their own mind...
    – cdjc
    Commented Sep 17, 2013 at 21:53

8 Answers 8


I'm reasonably certain that 24 oxen is, well, a lot of cow. What can we learn from this? First and foremost, that Elisha's family or clan was well-off.

Let's go to an authority. The Anchor Yale Bible, I Kings. Page 455:

19 He found Elisha son of Shaphat; he was plowing. The detail conveys more than local color; Elisha's prosaic background points up the diving quality of his selection. cf. 1 Sam 11:5-6; Amos 7:14-15.

There were twelve teams ahead of him. The large number of teams is generally taken as a sign of wealth; it was this that Elisha would have to give up if he were to follow Elijah.

The entire Elisha cycle is a set of legendary stories with strong echoes in folklore all-over. Reference the Anchor Bible for I and II Kings.

So you should expect to see details that are part of the art of storytelling. Some might even go so far as to say, 'tall tales.'

The immediate implication of all that beef is that it's a big deal for Elisha to throw all this over in favor of following Eliyahu. He is not some poor person with little to lose. (Though he is also not rich enough to get someone else to do his plowing for him.) It also suggests that he is a skillful, powerful, man. Controlling that much ambulatory hamburger is not an easy job.

You might also note two other bits of comparison to relatively nearby texts. First, note that the oxen end up as a sacrificial meal. This supports the idea that they belonged to him, not to the whole village or even perhaps the clan.

Second, note the 'sons of the prophets.' In the Hebrew Bible, prophets come in two flavors. There are the named prophets, who we might think of as ranging from Jonah to Jeremiah along some axis of seriousness. Then there are the nameless sons of the prophets. They travel around, they seem to engage in glossolalia and related practices. They are marginal characters in society. Presenting Elisha as this story presents him very firmly makes him a person of substance, not at all like one of them.

  • You clearly have a sense of humor that I appreciate. I also like how you briefly brought in the sons of the prophets. Since controlling 12 teams at a time is a lot of ambulatory hamburger to handle, part of me wonders if Elisha was managing a group of plowmen and that fact was simply expressed that way. Is there any way to determine one way or the other?
    – Frank Luke
    Commented Sep 18, 2013 at 14:16
  • 1
    I think that Cogan agrees with you, as he picks 'teams' as opposed to 'couples' of oxen as the translation. A team seems to me to imply a person directing. My original image was 12 yokes each of two oxen, but now I'm thinking a herd of oxen and a platoon of plowmen.
    – user947
    Commented Sep 19, 2013 at 0:58
  • Does Anchor have a citation to support the idea it is a sign of wealth? How do we know we aren't dealing with a group of workers for hire (that own oxen)?
    – Jay
    Commented Dec 11, 2016 at 7:40
  • 1
    please curtail you lack of faith (e.g. tall tales) - if you don't believe that's your problem but please don't inflict it on others
    – danday74
    Commented Jun 15, 2023 at 11:30

Arab farmers worked together for social and security reasons, and a single plow was not very effective.

However, the fact that the author mentions twelve pairs rather than simply many is a call to the ancient reader to understand the liturgical significance. Numbers are always significant in the Bible because an "accounting" communicates legal accountability. Hence, Jesus was "numbered with the transgressors" (Isaiah 53:12). This is also the reason the Jewish saints are numbered in Revelation 7 but the Gentile saints are not. The Jews were under the Law and therefore "numbered," so the passage replicates the repetitive nature of the book of Numbers. (Note that the Levites, not "connected" to the Land, were not to be numbered: Numbers 1:49).

What is the "liturgical significance." It is sacrificial. Elijah built a twelve stone altar on Carmel as a sacrificial substitute for Israel. What Elijah did in miniature (a "mountain" covered in blood and washed in water), God did at full size, slaying the priests of Baal and disposing of the bodies in the brook. The twelve stones were a "liturgical model" of Carmel. The heavenly fire upon the sacrifice became the fire of the Spirit in the hearts of God's armed servants.

Elisha's oxen also become a liturgical model of Israel. Since oxen are "servants" they picture priesthood, men who humble themselves before God and serve in His household. As a side note, the four faces of the cherubim correspond to the four compass points of the Tabernacle, with the face of the ox corresponding to the Bronze Altar, and the house of Moses and Aaron. Solomon's bronze sea was carried by twelve oxen, the twelve priestly tribes under the crystal sea (replicating the architecture of Israel under the "sapphire pavement" of Exodus 24). The picture is of Israel bearing the burden of the Law for the nations. Indeed, 70 bulls were sacrificed at the Feast of Booths for the 70 nations listed in Genesis 10.

Elisha's twenty-four oxen are no doubt priestly, so what is the significance of yoking? Yoking has to do with binding in Covenant, as Israel bound herself to false gods in Numbers, replicating the sin of the golden ox. We see the phrase in both the Old and New Testaments:

So Israel yoked himself to Baal of Peor. And the anger of the Lord was kindled against Israel. (Numbers 25:3)

Do not be unequally yoked with unbelievers. For what partnership has righteousness with lawlessness? Or what fellowship has light with darkness? (2 Cor 6:14)

In Numbers, the passage follows the order of the Ten Words, with this "yoking" corresponding to taking the Lord's name in vain. Taking the Lord's name refers to taking the Covenant oath, the "amen" which makes one accountable to God.

So it seems the twelve yoke of oxen are not the tribes in this case but the priests bound by Covenant, most likely a reference to the twenty-four courses of Aaronic priests set up by David (1 Chron. 24:1-19). The flesh is boiled with the yokes and eaten by the people, a reversal of the sacrifices for the people being eaten by the priests and by God. The old priesthood would be utterly consumed and its authority temporarily transfered to God's legal witnesses, the prophets.

So, Elijah calls Elisha from service under the Davidic Covenant to the prophetic ministry given to him on Horeb earlier in the chapter. Elijah was now a new Moses commissioned to deal with Israel's idolatry. He comes down the mountain and "the golden calf" is consumed. In this case, it is the Temple of Solomon.

We see the same ministry in Paul, who is commissioned in the wilderness, then sent to the Gentiles to provoke Israel to jealousy. The legal witness of the prophets brings down fire from heaven (Pentecost) and for those who reject this sign, the eventual destruction of the old house and its priesthood. Aligning these two events it seems that this consumption of the numbered oxen is like the Pentecostal sealing of the 144,000 "numbered" firstfruits Jewish believers in Revelation 7. Their sacrificial "consumption" (martyrdom) seals the guilt of the old order.

  • 2
    The OP asked for a non-allegorical answer.
    – user947
    Commented Sep 13, 2013 at 0:17
  • 4
    @bmargulies That's a modern constraint on ancient literature. The only reason the number of oxen is mentioned is the liturgical significance, as I stated.
    – Mike Bull
    Commented Sep 13, 2013 at 3:18
  • 3
    In other words, there is no non-allegorical answer.
    – Mike Bull
    Commented Sep 13, 2013 at 3:18
  • Note: Question is edited to allow for the original meaning to be allagorical
    – Jay
    Commented Oct 8, 2014 at 8:06

A couple thoughts I had were:

It says in the ESV that Elisha "was plowing with twelve yoke of oxen in front of him." The first image that came to my mind was that of a long string of 12 sets of oxen but that would seem to me an inefficient way to plow. How would you turn such a long train? One yoke is much easier to maneuver. Then we read that Elisha "was with the twelfth." It would seem a rather obvious and unnecessary statement to make since it already stated that the oxen were in front of him. My conclusion then is that there were 12 men driving 12 sets of oxen with Elisha handling the twelfth in the rear. To the reader of that day this would indicate that Elisha was a man of wealth.

  • 1
    Perry - Thank you for the approach you have taken. Can you provides us more information (or detail) that would not just rest on what you would tell me if we were drinking coffee at Starbucks? Can you provide us something with more analysis? Otherwise with just the anecdotal thought we are no closer to understanding the passage than if we speculated and pondered together what the passage means... Thanks!
    – Joseph
    Commented Mar 23, 2015 at 0:21
  • Agreed. Needs more backing and less personal speculation. Thanks for wishing to contribute! Commented Jun 26, 2016 at 14:31
  • 1
    I thought this was one of the clearest answers here. It makes total senses. He was with the 12th. Prior to reading this that didn't make much sense to me.
    – danday74
    Commented Jun 15, 2023 at 11:34

could it be that the oxen were insignificant only to the fact that it showed us that the very thing that we are bound buy has to be released in order for us to complete Gods divine will? What was holding him back? Wealth, work the constant idea that the oxen and the plow been stand in his way, there were 12 things that kept him from totally committing and the plow.Some times as men and women of God we are held back by the things that are so visible to the naked eye that we miss then true meaning of the word. We want so analyze break down the word for its most in-depth meaning that we miss the real meaning.

  • This answer is an edifying interpretation of the story. Thank-you. However, it is not the type of answer that is considered a good answer on this site and it is not the type of answer that the OP requested. The type of answer that is appropriate for this site would be an answer that explains the reason why Elisha would be plowing with such a large number of oxen in terms of the historical situation of the time. What does this action say about Elisha or the times?
    – user17080
    Commented Feb 12, 2018 at 7:55
  • I appreciate you point of view, Ted; perhaps in analysing the tree, we miss the forest? But I also think that, in seeing the forest, also analysing the tree can give us a deeper understanding of the forest. As the original asker of the question, I'd like to think I'm in the latter category. The Q&A nature of this site is inherently and deliberately informational rather than relational, and I think we should strive to keep the information (questions and answers) as precise, concise, accurate, and truthful as we can.
    – cdjc
    Commented Feb 12, 2018 at 19:25

In reference to your excellent expository answer may I add that I also see the fact the Elisha is wealthy and plowing with the oxen shows that he does not think too highly of himself and is willing to join with his servants in plowing along with them. Such is our example in Yeshua willing to co labor among us who are his humble servants.

  • Interesting point. How can one glean that Elisha was wealth? Could it be that he was a hired hand?
    – Philip
    Commented Apr 24, 2019 at 4:39
  • Welcome to the site, Katcoo4217. If you have not yet taken the Site Tour (to learn how it works and what is looked for with Askers and Answerers), do go to it (bottom of page, l.h.s.) The point in your answer is interesting, but may have been better placed as a comment to user947 (or Mike Bull if that was the answer you meant). Sometimes answers begin to wander away from the question but leaving comments allows for a little leeway.
    – Anne
    Commented Apr 25, 2019 at 11:26

Can we look it from another angle? Plowing in biblical times was mainly done by bondservants.. Could Elisha have been a bond servant in stead of being wealthy as we all are set to imagine? Being someone who is from lowly background but being called into higher ministry of plowing the hard hearts of men instead of plowing the hard ground which he was do well experienced in?

  • Welcome to BHSE! Please make sure you take our Tour. (See below left) Thanks. Commented Apr 23, 2019 at 19:01
  • I'm also curious as to how people reached the conclusion Elisha was rich.
    – Philip
    Commented Apr 24, 2019 at 4:41

Elijah and Elisha had never met, how did they recognise each other? The Bible didn't tell but there are subtle pictures in the scene. Let reviewed 1 Kings 19:19-21 (NIV)

19 So Elijah went from there and found Elisha son of Shaphat. He was plowing with twelve yoke of oxen, and he himself was driving the twelfth pair. Elijah went up to him and threw his cloak around him.

20 Elisha then left his oxen and ran after Elijah. “Let me kiss my father and mother goodbye,” he said, “and then I will come with you.” “Go back,” Elijah replied. “What have I done to you?”

21 So Elisha left him and went back. He took his yoke of oxen and slaughtered them. He burned the plowing equipment to cook the meat and gave it to the people, and they ate. Then he set out to follow Elijah and became his servant.

In verse 19, it was seen Elisha was a servant who was driving the twelfth pair of oxen in the field. When Elijah threw his cloak around him, this was a scene similar in the parable of the prodigal son, a sign that the father reinstated his son status. Elisha recognised the sign, and knew his new master, Elijah came to get him.

In verse 20, we saw Elisha left his oxen and ran after Elijah, which meant Elijah walked away after gave his cloak to Elijah.

Verse 21 we saw Elisha cook his yoke of oxen with his equipment. A scene that he gave up everything he had to follow Elijah. From here we saw his determination.

It should be a misunderstanding to see Elisha was wealthy when the scripture mentioned 12 yoke of oxen and only Elisha was named. It was not possible an ordinary man could drive 12 yoke of oxen. He was just one of the twelve servants who drove his own yoke of oxen, which he slaughtered and cooked to the people.

We may understand that there was not much opportunity in those days and finding a good master would ensure a better life. Elisha was surely wise to observe his opportunity and he had the determination to give up everything to follow Elijah.


My thoughts are that this man did everything with all his heart and clearly was a practical hands on person also he was a man of great faith as well being in tune with the Spirit of God, purpose and identity, 12 yoke yes a yoke is a team, we have to stick to the facts on the page, 12 yoke or teams, more practical for a very large areas if one can handle that many teams,finish the ends with smaller team (s) physically he may have reached the limit of practical sensibility with that many yoke, and yes he would have been fairly rich, which makes it even more precious to the Lord as Jesus said it’s harder for a rich man to enter the kingdom than a ships rope to go through the eye of a needle. He was ready for the next paradigm shift. (Peshitta Aramaic translation - G.Lamsa verson)


Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.