0

In Acts 15 a dispute between Paul and Peter is described. Here are the details, as I understand them:

  1. Peter was denying table fellowship to new Christian converts who were not circumcised and who did not obey Jewish ceremonial washings. (Galatians 2:11-12)
  2. Peter himself had given up obedience to the strict Jewish customs himself, yet was still requiring the same of new converts. (Galatians 2:14)
  3. In doing this, Peter was deferring to James the Brother of Jesus.
  4. This all suggests that James was the de facto leader of the young Christian movement.

My first question: is this incident at Antioch the same one that is described by Luke-Acts in Acts 15? What are the options?

Luke-Acts takes pains to suggest that there was great harmony between Paul and the Jerusalem Elders. In Acts 9:27-28 Luke-Acts states that very soon after his marvelous conversion on the road to Damascus, that Barnabas took Paul to the Jerusalem Elders and was accepted by them. It seems that Paul disagrees with this later account by Acts-Luke. In Galatians 1 Pauls describes his own miracle story. Paul incists that he was not taught the Gospel by those in Jersulam (or by anyone else, see Galatians 1:11-16). In verse 17 he explicitly states that, contrary to Act 9, he did not go directly to Jerusalam, but instead went into Arabia. Only after 3 years did he go to Jerusalem, and while there saw no other Apostles besides Peter and James. The Jerusalem leaders accepted Paul's authority and struck a deal whereby Paul would teach to the Gentiles while Peter and James et al would teach to the Jews.

My second question: Is this factually correct?

Third question: What are the other interpretive options here?

Many thanks!

  • What evidence do you have that these are not the same incident ? – Nigel J Jul 19 '19 at 17:22
  • @NigelJ I have none. I just want to know if there is any. Thanks. – TJB Jul 19 '19 at 19:33
1

Q1. The Acts 15 meetings between Paul and Peter takes place in Jerusalem. The Galatians 2 discussion meeting takes place in Antioch.

Q2. I do not have a reason to believe any of it is factually incorrect.

Q3. No deal struck between Peter and Paul about who would go where. Paul was directly commanded by the risen Jesus to go to the gentiles. 15 But the Lord said to him, “Go, for he is a chosen instrument of Mine, to bear My name before the Gentiles and kings and the sons of Israel; Acts 9

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.