Daniel 2:32, 39 (NASB)

32 "The head of that statue was made of fine gold, its breast and its arms of silver, its belly and its thighs of bronze, 33 its legs of iron, its feet partly of iron and partly of clay."

39 "After you there will arise another kingdom inferior to you, then another third kingdom of bronze, which will rule over all the earth."

  • It would have been, at the very least, a breach of etiquette, possibly even treason, to have said otherwise; for other examples of courtly deference, see 2:4, 3:9, 4:19, 5:10, 6:6, 6:21. See also the classical ages of man.
    – Lucian
    Aug 15 '21 at 11:43

In many (superficial) ways the Medo-Persion empire was superior to the Babylonian. The Medo-Persian Empire was larger geographically and lasted longer. However, it was inferior to Babylon in some significant ways:

Babylon's monarch was absolute in every sense of the word: responsible to no-one with an almost unvanquished army. Medo-Persia's king reigned by agreement between the leaders of Media and Persia, was subject the laws of the land, had an army that was regularly defeated, used seven assistant "rulers" or advisers (See Esther 1); succession was often disputed, etc.

That is, the Babylonian kings were more like absolute monarchs and more akin in power (not character) to the Jewish idea of divine rule.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.