0

On the one hand we have the Exodus 14 account that reads

“Then Moses stretched out his hand over the sea; and the LORD caused the sea to go back by a strong east wind all that night, and made the sea into dry land, and the waters were divided.” ‭‭Exodus‬ ‭14:21‬

But then in the song that they sang the next chapter/day it reads

“And with the blast of Your nostrils The waters were gathered together; The floods stood upright like a heap; The depths congealed in the heart of the sea.” ‭‭Exodus‬ ‭15:8‬ ‭

I understand that in the Hebrew the ruach of God’s nostrils could have gone all night as per chapter 14 and it wouldn’t be a contradiction.

But why would the translators use blast?

a sudden and violent gust of wind

(Additionally - Is it possible that this is intended to illustrate the immensity of God by showing that just one blast of God’s nostrils lasts ~8-12 hours? A hypothetical comparison of lung size for instance. I’m trying all kinds of explanations)

  • How would you translate it? "with the wind of your nostrils"? Nostrils don't produce winds! The best way to translate in a way that doesn't look too weird is by saying "blast". I don't see any mistranslation or cause for concern here. – Bach Apr 17 '19 at 13:18
  • That’s a fair point @Bach let me consider an alternative given the Hebrew uses ruach. The breath of your nostrils? I’ll think about it some more. Also I’m not saying it’s a mistranslation. I am curious though if there is a reason I’m not aware of maybe pertaining to old English or Latin – Nihil Sine Deo Apr 17 '19 at 13:32
  • 1
    you didn't post this question so there's no reason for you to vindicate the OP's post :) – Bach Apr 17 '19 at 15:16
-1

Re: the QUESTION asked was quote: "Were The Waters Parted Instantly?" As in EXODUS chapter 14:21 "And Moses stretched out his hand over the sea ; and the LORD caused the sea to go (back) note this word was added by the King James 1611 translaters and was not in the actual scriptures.Pls note.--to go (back) by a strong east wind all that, and made the sea dry (land) again another addition. That is the word -land. So the ANSWER is simple. Correction.Praise the LORD.With "REVELATION " one must thank Him for it .It's not us.The answer is a 'Blessing' like a window from from Heaven. Just believe. The answer is in front of you in your KJ bible if you have one so you really don't need me but suffice to say : (1) Answer is - "NO, no "instantly" here. (2) Let me please explain It's simple .Take a plastic cup.Now fill it with water.Now put it into the fridge / freezer section. Have you done that.Now take it out say in 5 minutes.Now is it frozen solid ."CONGEALED" see EXODUS 15:8 read and note.The answer is no as it will take time in the fridge ,even in the freezer section to go solid. Now when you apply a strong wind to water.What do you get ?. You are right .Ice (even SNOW at first but with this "strong east wind all that night," wow,it would have been cold.Exodus 14:21 it then made the water ---ICE (water hard).CONGEALED . THERE WAS NO PARTING.(REVELATION- not interpretation). The people walked across the Red Sea (crossing) on the sand which would have blown onto the top so they all crossed on the surface.There was no parting and one can clearly see that from the Bible. You will.Lets take out those two "ring-ins",namely,'back' and 'land' and re-read it .Can you now see the difference. The sea went to go by a strong east wind. See - it did not go back.He then made it dry. No land here now. "DIVIDED" that can.be explained too.Imagine a highway,hard CONGEALED water .Sand on.Here was their passage.But very wide.Now imagine either side the ordinary water/sea. Once the Israelites crossed the water then returned to normal temperature via God/Moses and the rest is history. Confirmation is found in EXODUS 15:5 "The depths have covered them: they sank into the bottom as a stone." Well to sink you have to go from top to bottom. Read Exodus 15:10b they sank as lead in the mighty waters." Note SANK. So again the ANSWER is no the waters were not parted instantly and in fact were not parted at all. Blessings user 32276 Dennis

|improve this answer|||||

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.