1 Corinthians 15:5 NASB

5 and that He appeared to Cephas, then to the twelve.

In all the narratives of four evangelists there seem to be no record of Christ meeting Cephas then the twelve after his resurrection,but that he met them together

Matthew 28:16 NASB

16 But the eleven disciples proceeded to Galilee, to the mountain which Jesus had designated. 17 When they saw Him, they worshiped Him; but some were doubtful. 18 And Jesus came up and spoke to them, saying, “All authority has been given to Me in heaven and on earth.

Mark 16:14 NASB

14 Afterward He appeared to the eleven themselves as they were reclining at the table; and He reproached them for their unbelief and hardness of heart, because they had not believed those who had seen Him after He had risen.

Luke 24:38 NASB

36 While they were telling these things, He Himself stood in their midst and *said to them, “Peace be to you.” 37 But they were startled and frightened and thought that they were seeing a spirit.

John 20:19 NASB

19 So when it was evening on that day, the first day of the week, and when the doors were shut where the disciples were, for fear of the Jews, Jesus came and stood in their midst and *said to them, “[b]Peace be with you.”

Could Paul be referring to another event which was not recorded by the Evangelists?


7 Answers 7


John explicitly states that his Gospel (and by extension the other Gospels as well) are far from complete (John 20:30, 31, 21:25) - Jesus did MANY other things that could not be recorded.

Jesus meeting Peter/Cephas alone is one of the few incidents recorded outside the Gospels. For another example, see Acts 1:5-11 for a series of details not recorded in the Gospels.

Therefore, if Paul stated under divine inspiration in 1 Cor 15 that Jesus met Cephas, then I must presume that this is a recording of the facts.


Paul wasn’t depending on the Gospels for his historic account of the resurrection. He depended on eye witnesses. In 1 Cor. 15 Paul dealt with those in Corinth denying a bodily resurrection. That is why he referred to eye witnesses testimonies of the resurrection.

Paul’s purpose in appealing to witnesses still alive is to invite his readers to check his facts if they doubt his words.

Keener, C. S. (1993). The IVP Bible background commentary: New Testament (1 Co 15:6). Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.

He also noted how critical the resurrection is to the gospel.

For I delivered to you as of first importance what I also received: that Christ died for our sins in accordance with the Scriptures, that he was buried, that he was raised on the third day in accordance with the Scriptures, and that he appeared to Cephas, then to the twelve. Then he appeared to more than five hundred brothers at one time, most of whom are still alive, though some have fallen asleep. Then he appeared to James, then to all the apostles. Last of all, as to one untimely born, he appeared also to me. (1 Cor. 15:3–8, ESV)

Now if Christ is proclaimed as raised from the dead, how can some of you say that there is no resurrection of the dead? But if there is no resurrection of the dead, then not even Christ has been raised. And if Christ has not been raised, then our preaching is in vain and your faith is in vain. (1 Cor. 15:12–14, ESV)

As far as Paul’s account correlating with the Gospels, even the accounts of Christ’s resurrection in the Gospels seem to be contradictory because of the huge amount of detail left out, as John wrote:

Now Jesus did many other signs in the presence of the disciples, which are not written in this book; (John 20:30, ESV).

Now there are also many other things that Jesus did. Were every one of them to be written, I suppose that the world itself could not contain the books that would be written. (John 21:25, ESV)

However, a careful examination of the resurrection accounts reveals they can be consistent if one considers the left out details. This passage in Luke might be a reference to Christ appearing to Peter:

saying, “The Lord has risen indeed, and has appeared to Simon!” (Luke 24:34, ESV)

The appearance to Cephas, that is, Peter, is not recorded in the Gospels other than a passing reference in Luke 24.

Witherington, B., III. (1995). Conflict and Community in Corinth: A Socio-Rhetorical Commentary on 1 and 2 Corinthians (p. 300). Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co.

Note that writing material (papyrus and parchment) was expensive at that time and the codex (current book form) wasn’t yet known. Scrolls had a practical size limitation. Thus, the Gospels had less detail than we would like. John’s Gospel is purposely different because he avoided repeating the details in the other Gospels to have room for important details left out of the other Gospels.

Paul gave information about Peter not in the Gospels. He did have direct contact with Peter (Acts 15:7; Galatians 2:11-14).


The Gospels do indicate that Jesus appeared to Simon Peter prior to appearing to the rest of the apostles:

Saying, The Lord is risen indeed, and hath appeared to Simon. (Luke 24:34)

Note that this is just prior to Jesus’ appearance to the apostles in a group.

The twelve

But what about appearing to the twelve? Judas Iscariot was dead, and apparently Thomas wasn’t present at the first appearance to the apostles. Wouldn’t that mean just 10? One clever approach has been to say 10 apostles + 2 from the road to Emmaus = 12.

Although numerically that works, I think there’s an even simpler answer. “The twelve” is a reference to the apostles.

The creed of 1 Cor 15

One of the reasons the opening verses of 1 Cor 15 are so prevalent in apologetic circles is that it is widely held to be a creed that originated before Paul’s conversion, perhaps only a few months after Easter (see here). It’s very early evidence for the resurrection.

It is an easily memorized statement indicating not only who Jesus appeared to (note the Jewish custom of focusing on male witnesses), but also serves as a proof: if you don’t believe it, go ask one of these people.

This is certainly the most straightforward interpretation of the way Paul uses the creed:

After that, he was seen of above five hundred brethren at once; of whom the greater part remain unto this present, but some are fallen asleep. (1 Cor 15:6)

Paul is mentioning that many of them are still alive in order to challenge them to fact-check him if they don’t believe.


Cephas was witnessing to both historical events the present and future resurrections.
Christ's resurrection of which the apostles were witnesses which is decisive proof of the future resurrection of all which the Old Testament prophecy this is why the resurrection of Christ is the foundation of faith it can also be called the first fruit Cephas is talking to the one's who believes Christ rose from the dead.
The Jerusalem Bible 1st Corinthians chapter 15

  • Welcome and thank you for your contribution. When you get a chance, please take the Tour to understand how the site works and how it is different than others.
    – agarza
    Mar 7, 2021 at 22:18

Yeshua appeared to Mary Magdalene at the tomb first. Then she ran back and told Peter or Cephas and the rest of the disciples what she witnessed. Then he appeared to the twelve disciples who were in disbelief until he showed them his wounds which fulfilled the prophecy which was written. Amen.

Matthew 28:5-10
Revelations 1:17,18


Presupposition to my answer: 1) I confine my remarks to early sources in the NT, eg. 1 Cor.15:5 and Mark 16. The Koine Greek verb orao and its variants have to do with seeing. In the case of the middle deponent and passive voice the designated subject is the one who initiates the visible manifestation. This omits any attempt to prove grammatically that the appearances were simply the interior vision psychologically induced or sustained by the object who is witness. In terms of 1 Cor.15:5: "He was seen by Peter," the initiator of the appearance is God in Christ, ie. Christ (a divine passive voice here) and the one who sees this active subject is Peter.

The occasions of the appearances of Jesus to the various witnesses recorded in Paul's letter here characterize the subject object as concrete and historical to support the bodily resurrection from the dead of Jesus. It is not a psychologically induced vision from inside the one who sees. It is the appearance of the subject of Christ who presents himself alive concretely to others who witness him.

  • Welcome to Bible Hermeneutics SE and thank you for your contribution. When you get a chance, please take the Tour to understand how the site works and how it is different than others.
    – agarza
    Mar 31, 2021 at 3:39
  • This is not at all clear. I suggest a significant edit to clarify the grammar comments and also to clarify the timeline of events.
    – Nigel J
    Apr 2, 2021 at 6:34

Who needed to see Jesus and clear conscience with him more than Peter? After his denial on Thursday evening, Peter had no doubt been in agony through the hours. It would be just like the Lord to seek Peter out privately at some point on that Sunday to tell him that he was forgiven and that Peter was going to be needed more than ever going forward. The fact that the gospel writers do not include this meeting makes it all the more sublime . . . . . at least to me . . . just like the Lord Jesus.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.