After they are defeated by the Israelites at Rephidim, God promises unending judgement on Amalek in Exodus 17:

14Then the Lord said to Moses, “Write this as a memorial in a book and recite it in the ears of Joshua, that I will utterly blot out the memory of Amalek from under heaven.15And Moses built an altar and called the name of it, The Lord Is My Banner, 16saying, “A hand upon the throne of the Lord! The Lord will have war with Amalek from generation to generation.ESV

The reason for the judgement and the form of the judgement are given in slightly more detail in Deuteronomy 25:

17“Remember what Amalek did to you on the way as you came out of Egypt, 18how he attacked you on the way when you were faint and weary, and cut off your tail, those who were lagging behind you, and he did not fear God. 19Therefore when the Lord your God has given you rest from all your enemies around you, in the land that the Lord your God is giving you for an inheritance to possess, you shall blot out the memory of Amalek from under heaven; you shall not forget. ESV

What I find difficult to understand is how 'the Lord will have war with Amalek from generation to generation' if their memory has been blotted out from under heaven. Am I missing the Hebrew idiom here? Is one or other of the statements not to be taken literally, and if so, which one?

6 Answers 6


When the Israelites entered the Promised Land the Amalekites had “tripped them up.” That is, they attacked the Israelites at their weak spot, or at their hindermost part or "tail," which was comprised of those who had lagged behind (Deut 25:17).

The Hebrew word for the hindermost part of the body is עָקֵב, which is used in the Hebrew Bible to refer to the rear echelon of an army (Genesis 49:19 and Joshua 8:13). That is, the rear echelon of an army is their hindermost part. The Amalekites attacked Israel at their hindermost part.

The exact same Hebrew word is also found in Genesis 3:15, where the serpent bites the "hindermost part" of the seed of the woman -- that is, the serpent attacks his heel, since the heel is physiologically the hindermost part of the human body. The seed of the serpent is therefore the enemy of God. It is the intent of the seed of the serpent “to trip up” the seed of God.

“Amalek” therefore is the enemy of the seed of God (Israel), who “trips up” at the most vulnerable time and opportunity. In the context of the Torah (first five books of the Hebrew Bible), the Amalekites in Canaan were not the seed of the Amorites, the Hittites, the Perizzites, the Canaanites, the Hivites or the Jebusites, but of Esau (Genesis 36:12). When Esau was born, his twin brother tried “to trip him up” at birth, and therefore the twin brother was named “Jacob.” Please note that “Jacob” (יַעֲקֹב) and “heel” (עָקֵב) are therefore related etymologically. Jacob later deceived his father Isaac in order to inherit the blessing of the firstborn -- that is, he had STRIVEN to inherit the promises made to Abraham and Isaac. Jacob “tripped up” his brother Esau to this end (of course he had already first secured the birthright from Esau in exchange for a mess of pottage, when Esau was most vulnerable because of hunger). Because Jacob was persistent and had striven with man (and now with God in Genesis 32:28) to inherit the promises to Abraham and Isaac, his name was changed from one who "trips up" to one who "persists" or strives with God (Israel).

The promised seed of Abraham therefore passes from Abraham to Isaac, and now to Jacob (Israel), whose sworn enemy in the Promised Land is Amalek. This hostility is not only between the biological descendants of Esau and Jacob, but also between those who are sons of promise to Abraham and those who reject the promise (like Esau).

Thus the Lord will have war with "Amalek" from generation to generation, notwithstanding that the biological Amalekites are no longer an identifiable race of people on the earth anymore.

Aside (not directly related to the question):

Let me illustrate from the New Testament. Jesus was born of Mary (seed of the woman). As the biological son of David through Mary, and therefore of Abraham, he was “tripped up” by his enemy. When Jesus quoted Psalm 41:9 (in John 13:18) he was referring to someone who would “trip him up.” (That is, he [Judas Iscariot] “lifting his heel [עָקֵב] against me”). Judas was his friend (in fact his disciple) and therefore his immediate access to Jesus was a point of vulnerability. Judas "tripped up" Jesus, since he was able to identify Jesus’ whereabouts when he was alone, and therefore betray him. In other words, Jesus (the seed) was "tripped up" by the seed of the serpent. Judas is the "son" of perdition (John 17:12). Jesus and Judas Iscariot were biological descendants of Jacob, but Judas Iscariot was not the son of the promise to Abraham but the son of perdition. Thus while there may no longer be any biological "Amalekites" on the earth anymore, Amalekites are also those who are enemies of the Promised Seed -- i.e., those who "trip up" the sons of Promise. Judas Iscariot was such a person.


The deity of the Pentateuch is not precisely omnipotent (or unique). So, stating an intention to blot out the memory of Amalek does not imply success. The process of eliminating the memory is, in this case, 'war from generation to generation'. G!d stops the sun, and performs other miracles, but never wipes out any other nation. G!d instructs the People of Israel to do so, and that clearly doesn't happen to any of the original inhabitants of Caanan, any more that it happens to Amalek.

So, the answer, in theory, is 'yes'.


The Amalekites represent the forces of evil in the world. This explains why they must be fought in each generation. It also explains the ferocity of the hatred shown to the Amalekites in the Bible. In the Book of Esther, for instance, we learn that Haman was a direct descendant of Agag, King of the Amalekites. This same Haman was plotting the destruction of God's people. So we have a metaphorical way of explaining that he was an agent of the same Adversary that Moses, Joshuah and David fought against.


Is God still at war with Amalek?

The answer is NO.

During the reign of Hezekiah, 500 Simeonites annihilated the remnant of the Amalekites, so God is not still at war with the Amalek.

1 Chronicles 4:41-43 (NASB)

41 "These, recorded by name, came in the days of Hezekiah king of Judah, and [a]attacked their tents and the Meunites who were found there, and destroyed them utterly to this day, and lived in their place, because there was pasture there for their flocks."

42 "From them, from the sons of Simeon, five hundred men went to Mount Seir, with Pelatiah, Neariah, Rephaiah and Uzziel, the sons of Ishi, as their leaders. 43 They [b]destroyed the remnant of the Amalekites who escaped, and have lived there to this day."


Probably because of the sins of the Amalekites, and their sins against the people of God, God decided to fight against them from generation to generation until the memory of Amalek was blotted out from under heaven. Such fighting had actually taken a long time. In the time of Saul, God told him to attack the Amalekites and destroy everything that belongs to them, including Agag, the king of Amalekites. In the time of Esther, Mordecai the Benjamite was engaged by his rival Haman the Agagite, who was possibly a descendent of Agag the Amalek king. Today, the Amalekites do not exist any more, but the Israelites do. God had finally completed His fight against the Amalekites sometime in history.

  • Donald, could you add specific scripture references to support your answer?
    – Gina
    Commented Jun 23, 2018 at 15:29
  • I would like to up vote this answer but it lacks any primary source, which is a requirement. Can you please cite scripture, commentaries, histories, etc. to back up your assertions?
    – Ruminator
    Commented Jul 18, 2018 at 13:29

If I was troubled by a bad respiratory ailment, a doctor could look at me and say, "You will have a bad cough week after week, until you get better, perhaps years from now." In a similar fashion, God could tell the Hebrews, "the Lord will have war with Amalek from generation to generation" but also say that He would "utterly blot out the remembrance of Amalek from under heaven." The "generation to generation" was not a decree of eternality. It was a decree that it would happen for a long time but there was going to be a time when their evil would be cut off.

  • Welcome to BHSE! Please make sure you take our Tour; see below left. If possible, we'd like to have answers with Biblical text or other supporting documentation for analysis. Thanks. Commented Apr 16, 2019 at 20:16

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.