3

1 Kings 1:32-33:

"2 And king David said, Call me Zadok the priest, and Nathan the prophet, and Benaiah the son of Jehoiada. And they came before the king.

33 The king also said unto them, Take with you the servants of your lord, and cause Solomon my son to ride upon mine own mule, and bring him down to Gihon:" (KJV)

If a public ceremony was the only point of Solomon's anointing as the next king, why would he have to be taken out of the city to Gihon? What was there about Gihon that was necessary for the anointing of the king?

2

'Gihon' is Hebrew word that means 'to burst forth' or 'to gush'. It was that name of the spring that supplied water to the tabernacle and temple complex that Solomon later built. 2Chronicles 32 records how Hezekiah took counsel to contain and reroute this water supply so that the invading king of Assyria could not use it. You can walk through that tunnel today, and today that tunnel is within the borders of the modern city of Jerusalem.

The mouth of Gihon in David's day was outside the city walls of Jerusalem - but just barely. It was still in the vicinity of Jerusalem. David ordered Solomon to be anointed there because of the symbolism that accompanies springs. They support life. They are cleansing. They are refreshing.

In addition, 1Kings1:39 shows how Zadok took oil from the tabernacle to do the anointing. David also chose this place because it was close to the tabernacle which held some of the items they would need for the ceremony.

| improve this answer | |
  • that seems to be the customary symbolism attributed to the stream / river. But is there anything in the scriptures that support that? Or is it just from rabbinical sources? Was the water more important than we may suppose? – Gina Mar 10 '19 at 0:10
  • Fresh running water, as spring water מַ֥יִם חַיִּֽים (Lev. 14:5ff, living water) was very important in the Jewish Law. – Perry Webb Mar 11 '19 at 0:07
  • I will accept this answer as more nearly correct, even tho I am still looking for the connection. I believe there is more to it than just a place of fresh or gushing water. I am thinking it had more to do with the attempted coup of Adonijah. See israeljerusalem.com/gihon-spring.htm. Wanted to see if there was any scriptural support for this theory? – Gina Jan 6 at 20:28
1

Gihon was by this time included in a walled enclosure which effectivley made it part and parcel of the City of David. More importantly, David had erected the tent there for the ark because it marked the ancient site known as HaMakom--The Place--and was where the temple was to be erected (not up the hill where the alleged Temple Mount stands). Interested parties might like to see the Blog page at my website www.until-we-see.com for additional info.

IAN HEARD, Sydney, Australia

| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.