Matthew 1:17 KJV

17 So all the generations from Abraham to David are fourteen generations; and from David until the carrying away into Babylon are fourteen generations; and from the carrying away into Babylon unto Christ are fourteen generations.

In Matthew 1:17 we see 14 generations from exile to Jesus, but when we count Shealtiel to Jesus it's only 13. Why it is so? Please explain.

  • I believe the question relates more to the reason for which Jehoiakim was excluded from Matthew's list of Jesus' genealogy. – user21676 Nov 22 '18 at 20:55

I Chronicles 15 to 18 catalogues four men : Josiah, Jehoiakim, Jeconiah and Salathiel :

the sons of Josiah - Jehoiakim (v15)

and the sons of Jehoiakim - Jeconiah (v16)

and the sons of Jeconiah - Salathiel (v17)

The first 'Jeconiah' referred to by Matthew (Matthew 1:11) is the father, also called 'Jehoiakim' in Chronicles.

The second 'Jeconiah' referred to by Matthew in Matthew 1:12 is the son.


So the first 'Jeconiah' in Matthew's account is the father and is counted in the second stage of generations . . . to give fourteen.

And the second 'Jeconiah' must be counted in Matthew's calculation for his third stage of generations . . .

. . . which also gives fourteen generations.


The last generation should be translate Joseph the father or gardian of Mary. Aramaic Bible in Plain English Yaqob begot Yoseph the guardian of Maryam, her from whom was begotten Yeshua, who is called The Messiah. Marys father had the same name as her husband. A nd that makes 14

  • 1
    Welcome to BHSX. Thanks for your comment. If you are suggesting that the text of the commonly accepted Bible should be amended then you should provide evidence and references. – user25930 Jan 15 at 9:47
  • @user25930 The Greek work anēr (Strong's G435) is a generic word for man. If the translators had chosen 'father' instead of 'husband', it would have avoided a lot of confusion. Notice how it reads when translated 'father': i.imgur.com/aKeINRi.jpg – Bible Explorer Dec 3 at 7:16

If you read further, you’ll note that God the Holy Spirit is the 13th name in the lineage. Jesus is the last, the 14th. Jesus is the Son of God.


Following Matthew’s stipulations, you should have counted from Babylon/JECHONIAS (NOT his son SALATHIEL) & then the total would be 14 (from ‘BABYLON unto CHRIST’).

But before I explain further, it will be quickly objected that this answer only pushes the problem back to Matthew’s previous groupings of “14”. I will explain fully. Your ‘problem’ should become obvious, as at the same time we dispose of the (often snarkily) repeated assertion that MATTHEW was bad at Math, because 3 times 14 equals 42, not 41 (generations Matthew names in Chapter 1).

Matthew was a TAXMAN, and we can know confidently that he never would have been hired, nor long kept his job, if he couldn’t figure 3x14=42. So Matthew was doing something else here in verse 17.

Matthew was not making a mathematic statement, but rather making a mnemonic suggestion, a way people might begin to memorize the genealogy he records by memorizing them in 3 logical groups.

First, I presume you meant in your question to type the Greek SALATHIEL, (Matthew 1:12 “& AFTER they were brought to Babylon, Jechonias begat Salathiel; …”)) because SHEALTIEL is not mentioned in MATTHEW chapter 1.

The key is to understand that in verse 17, Matthew is recapitulating the genealogy and listing David TWICE (that is to say, in TWO of the groups of 14). And he did so to emphasize KING DAVID’s unique and monumental demarkation & status as the progenitor of the Royal line from which the Messiah must be descended.

Examine carefully Matthew 1:17 KJV: ”So all the generations from Abraham to David [are] 14 generations; - & from David UNTIL the carrying away into Babylon [are] 14 generations; - & from the carrying away into Babylon unto Christ [are] 14 generations."

DAVID was memorized as the final name in the first ’14 generations’ (from Abraham up to and including David), & again memorized as the 1st of the 2nd group of 14. Thus 3 groups of ’14’, but because DAVID IS DUPLICATED, the total is actually 41, not 42.

Look carefully: for memorization, KING DAVID is counted again as the first of the 2nd “14 generations” “until the carrying away into Babylon”. Note well that ‘until’ Babylon does not include Babylon, but rather “up until”, ie, just before. So up UNTIL BABYLON would conclude with Josias, not Jechonias, as the final of the second 14. ((Matthew 1:10 KJV) “…& Amon begat Josias;”)

(Matthew 1:11 KJV) "And Josias begat JECHONIAS … about the TIME THEY WERE CARRIED AWAY TO BABYLON:” (Mat 1:12) "And AFTER they were brought to Babylon, Jechonias begat Salathiel; …”

In conclusion, people easily (& often intentionally) think the genealogies of the Old and New Testaments confusing. The names are strange, and often have variant spellings. Also, there is no reason to believe that any of these genealogies are all inclusive, as there is good reason to believe that they ‘skipped’ many generations and only highlighted the more significant ones.

Also, your question often leads to the next claim of ‘contradiction’, that the genealogies of MATTHEW versus LUKE differ. But, though Christians may differ, there are powerful and obvious reasons to conclude that Matthew, writing to the Hebrews, was giving the genealogy through the father Joseph, while Luke was listing that through the line of Mary.

I hope I have made this clear, and that the question of genealogies will not be an obstacle.

  • Matthew's list is the genealogy of the royal line which does not, necessarily, follow the direct genealogy (as listed by Luke) of the firstborn in each generation. Royal succession sometimes necessitates other than the direct firstborn being chosen. – Nigel J Nov 27 '18 at 19:48

The question of Matthew's genealogy is much worse than that. His numerical pattern of fourteen is clearly intended to impress the reader that Jesus' coming was part of a divine plan. But his list of names leaves out several generations between David and the deportation to Babylon, as compared to the list in 1 Chronicles 3:10-12. The names of Ahaziah, Joash, Amaziah, and Azariah are omitted, and the name "Uzziah" appears instead. Also, the name Jehoiakim is missing from between Josiah and Jechoniah.

This material was evidently included for propaganda value, similar to many other of Matthew's claims of "fulfillment".

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.