Behold, the days are coming, declares the LORD, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and the house of Judah (Jeremiah 31:31 ESV)

Since the house of Judah includes the house of David, does Jeremiah 31:31 have any affect on the Davidic covenant?

2 Answers 2


No, first because the Davidic Covenant is unconditional and is God’s promise to David and Israel that the Messiah would come from the lineage of David and the tribe of Judah and would establish a kingdom that would endure forever. The Davidic Covenant is unconditional because God does not place any conditions of obedience upon its fulfilment. The surety of the promises made rests solely on God’s faithfulness and does not depend at all on David or Israel’s obedience. The Davidic Covenant stands and the ultimate fulfilment will be realised after the millennial reign of Christ Jesus.

Second, the prophecy in Jeremiah about the New Covenant refers, not to the Davidic Covenant but to the Mosaic Covenant which is a conditional covenant made between God and the nation of Israel at Mount Sinai (Exodus 19-24). The blessings and curses that are associated with this conditional covenant are found in detail in Deuteronomy 28. The other covenants found in the Bible are unilateral covenants of promise, in which God binds Himself to do what He promised, regardless of what the recipients of the promises might do. On the other hand the Mosaic Covenant is a bilateral agreement, which specifies the obligations of both parties to the covenant.

Jesus Christ came to fulfil the Law of Moses (Matthew 5:17) and to establish the New Covenant between God and His people. The Old (Mosaic) Covenant was written in stone, but the New Covenant is written on our hearts. Entering the New Covenant is made possible only by faith in Christ, who shed His blood to take away the sins of the world (John 1:29). Luke 22:20 relates how Jesus, at the Last Supper, takes the cup and says, “This cup that is poured out for you is the new covenant in my blood” (ESV).

The Mosaic Law points the way towards the coming of Christ (Galatians 3:24-25). It was replaced by the New Covenant in Christ which fulfils the promises made in Jeremiah 31:31-34, as quoted in Hebrews 8:8-13:

For he finds fault with them when he says: “Behold, the days are coming, declares the Lord, when I will establish a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah, not like the covenant that I made with their fathers on the day when I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt. For they did not continue in my covenant, and so I showed no concern for them, declares the Lord. For this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, declares the Lord: I will put my laws into their minds, and write them on their hearts, and I will be their God, and they shall be my people. And they shall not teach, each one his neighbor and each one his brother, saying, ‘Know the Lord,’ for they shall all know me, from the least of them to the greatest. For I will be merciful toward their iniquities, and I will remember their sins no more.” In speaking of a new covenant, he makes the first one obsolete. And what is becoming obsolete and growing old is ready to vanish away.

“Therefore he [Christ] is the mediator of a new covenant, so that those who are called may receive the promised eternal inheritance, since a death has occurred that redeems them from the transgressions committed under the first covenant” (Hebrews 9:15).

The New Covenant blessings are open to the House of Israel and the House of Judah. After the resurrection of Christ, Gentiles were also brought into the New Covenant (Ephesians 2:11–22).

EDIT: Where “the house of Israel and the house of Judah” are mentioned in Jeremiah 31:27 and 31, The Companion Bible draws attention to the union of the two houses. “Israel is always named first, for this was the name of the whole nation, which Judah was not.” The house of Israel was composed of two tribes, and the house of Judah was composed of ten tribes.

Why is the house of Judah mentioned here in Jeremiah, along with the house of Israel? Judah was the fourth son born to Jacob (Genesis 29:30) but he inherited the rule after his three older brothers disqualified themselves by gross misconduct. Simeon and Levi broke their father’s covenant and slaughtered an entire people (Genesis 34). Reuben disgraced himself with Jacob’s concubine (1 Chronicles 5:1-2). Jacob prophesied that

the sceptre shall not depart from Judah, nor a lawgiver from between his feet, until Shiloh come; and unto him shall the gathering of the people be (Genesis 49:9-10).

Quoting Isaiah 11:1-2, with regard to the Gentiles, Romans 15:12 refers to the father of David:

The Root of Jesse will spring up, one who will arise to rule over the nations; the Gentiles will hope in him.

The significance and importance attached to Judah is borne out in Revelation 5:5 which refers to Jesus as “the Lion of the tribe of Judah, the Root of David”.

P.S. My understanding is that the old covenant refers to the Mosaic Law inaugurated at Sinai (Exodus 24:3-8) which is conditional and not to the Davidic covenant which is unconditional and does not equate to law.

  • 1
    If everything you say is correct, then why does the LORD add the "house of Judah" to the "house of Israel" with whom He is making a new covenant? What I mean is, if you remove "the house of Judah" from the passage in Jeremiah, your answer makes perfect sense. So why add the house of Judah if it is completely unnecessary to describe the scope and/or extent of the new covenant? Dec 19, 2018 at 21:17
  • @RevelationLad - Forgive me for not responding to your comment but it only come to my attention when someone down-voted my answer a coupld of days ago. I have been pondering the importance of why the house of Judah is mentioned in Jeremiah, and although I don't pretend to fully understand this, I have added an explanatory edit that might shed light on the reason for both houses (Israel and Judah) being mentioned. I still don't understand why you are linking the new covenant to the Davidic covenant, though. Perhaps I'm missing something here? Good question, by the way.
    – Lesley
    Dec 3, 2021 at 16:28

NO; The Davidic covenant is for a King from him to rule forever (Jesus):-

Psalm 89:34-36 NWT "I will not violate my covenant Or change what my lips have spoken. 35 I have sworn in my holiness, once and for all; I will not tell lies to David. 36 His offspring will endure forever; His throne will endure like the sun before me."

The New Covenant is between God; Jesus; and Jesus diciples who go, in the future, into the Heavenly Kingdom and rule with Jesus (see 2 Tim. 2:12):-

The New Covenant:-

Luke 22:20 NWT "“This cup means the new covenant by virtue of my blood, which is to be poured out in your (the 11 firstly) behalf."


Luke 22:28-29 NWT “However, you are the ones (the 11, Judas has left) who have stuck with me in my trials; 29 and I make a covenant with YOU (the 11), just as my Father has made a covenant with me, for a kingdom,"

  • God’s Cov with Jesus for a kingdom. Ps. 110:4 Jehovah has sworn an oath, and he will not change his mind: “You (Jesus) are a priest (& King) forever In the manner of Melchizedek!” & Heb 7:1 For this Melchizedek, KING of Saʹlem, PRIEST of the Most High God, & Heb 5:4-6 So, too, the Christ did not glorify himself by becoming a high priest, but was glorified by the One who said to him: “You are my son; today I have become your father.” As he also says in another place, “You are a (King &) priest forever in the manner of Melchizedek.” Then come the Cov. 2 For a KINGDOM with his followers.
    – user26950
    Oct 29, 2018 at 17:21
  • Jesus as KING:Rev. 17:14 These will battle with the Lamb [Jesus], but because he is Lord of lords and KING of kings, the Lamb [Jesus] will conquer them. & Rev 19:13-16 he is called by the name The Word [Jesus] of God. ... 15 And out of his [KING Jesus] mouth protrudes a sharp, long sword with which to strike the nations, and he [KING Jesus] will shepherd them with a rod of iron. Moreover, he [KING Jesus] treads the winepress of the fury of the wrath of God the Almighty. 16 On his outer garment, yes, on his thigh, he [The Word Jesus] has a name written, KING of kings and Lord of lords.
    – user26950
    Oct 29, 2018 at 17:47
  • God as King: 1 Sam12:12 "... God is your King." Ps 5:2 O my King and my God, . . . Ps 44:4 You are my King, O God;. . . Ps 47:7, 8 For God is King of all the earth; Sing praises, and show insight. 8 God has become King over the nations.. . . Ps 84:3 My King and my God! Ps 95:3 For Jehovah is a great God, A great King over all other gods. So How is God not a King?
    – user26950
    Oct 29, 2018 at 18:20
  • Let us continue this discussion in chat.
    – Ruminator
    Oct 29, 2018 at 18:27
  • Not so because "Melchizedek" was a Priest King and Jesus was going to become the same.
    – user26950
    Oct 29, 2018 at 18:37

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.