If we take Genesis 1 as supplying the outline of the making of the sky and land biodome it says that vegetation appeared on day 3 and the seeds were in the plants:
NIV Genesis 1:11 Then God said, “Let the land produce vegetation: seed-bearing plants and trees on the land that bear fruit with seed in it, according to their various kinds.” And it was so. 12 The land produced vegetation: plants bearing seed according to their kinds and trees bearing fruit with seed in it according to their kinds. And God saw that it was good. 13 And there was evening, and there was morning—the third day.
However, in Genesis 2 it appears he made the seeds first and the vegetation failed to appear because man had not yet begun cultivation:
NIV Genesis 2:5 Now no shrub of the field had yet appeared on the earth, nor had any plant of the field sprouted; for the LORD God had not yet sent rain upon the earth, and there was no man to cultivate the ground.
However in the next verse he says that the seeds were watered only from the earth instead of from the sky:
NIV Genesis 2:6 But springs [actually, a "mist"] welled up from the earth and watered the whole surface of the ground.
Genesis 1 seems to say that God made plants with seeds in them rather than making seeds and sprouting them with rain as in Genesis 2
I don't see how the water from the sprinkler system failed to cause the seeds to sprout while water from the sky does (except in metaphor where it might be significant)
How can these accounts be reconciled?