1

In 1 Corinthians Paul seems to be suggesting that the Corinthians should not worry about who is doing the teaching as long as they don't mess with the foundation, which is Christ. Is he endorsing all future speakers or only the apostles?:

NIV 1 Corinthians 3:

21 So then, no more boasting about human leaders! All things are yours, 22 whether Paul or Apollos or Cephas or the world or life or death or the present or the future—all are yours, 23 and you are of Christ, and Christ is of God.

In other words, is his "all things are yours" speech intended to make his hearers more "liberal" about their sources or only to say that all of the apostles are on equal footing?

In other words, is he saying "don't worry about who's speaking because all teachers are have something for you" or is he saying "don't worry about which apostle is speaking because all apostles are beneficial to you"?

1

The text in 1 Cor 3:18-23 is the conclusion of the passage 1 Cor 1:10 to 1 Cor 3:17 which discusses divisions in the church and the pride that some felt because their faction leader was better than another faction leader. This is easy to see because it is a precis of all that has gone before, viz:

  • Paul, Apollos, Cephas, Christ - see 1 Cor 1:10-17, 3:1-9
  • Wisdom of world & foolishness of God - see 1 Cor 1:18-25, 27, 30-31, 2:4-15
  • The argument that Paul develops is illustrated by building metaphors (1 Cor 3:9b-17), class structures of noble vs lowly (1 Cor 1:26-27), oratory (1 Cor 2:1), daily food (1 Cor 3:1-2), farming (1 Cor 3:6-9), etc. This is quintessential Pauline discussion.

Thus, Paul strongly condemns pride and factions in the church and encourages all people to recognise each others' strengths and work together for the common good. Perhaps 1 Cor 4:1 ought to be regarded as part of Paul's conclusion or at least a segue to the next section; however, 1 Cor 4 does allude to the earlier three chapters (eg, 1 Cor 4:10).

Thus Paul's comments are directed to the whole church to prevent division and factionalism.

Lastly, let me discuss the details of your final question. I do not believe Paul is debating the equality (or otherwise) of different apostles and their teaching. He is definitely not saying that (v22) that Paul, Apollos and Cephas are equivalent because the list is much longer - he is definitely not suggesting that Paul, Apollos, Cephas, the world, life and death are all equivalent. Paul is discussing the Christian "freedom" as a final argument against factionalism.

The sentence "All things are yours" occurs twice (v21 & v22) and so is important. Because it is part of Paul's concluding remarks about factionalism, one assumes that his list of "Paul, Apollos, Cephas, the world. Life, death, the present or the future - all are yours" means that Christians should use whatever is useful and beneficial wherever they find it; that is, we should not be confined by a faction or division (or factional leader) to which we may be foolishly attached. Paul utters similar sentiments later in 1 Cor 6:12, 10:22, 23, "all things are lawful for me but not all things are beneficial".

  • Updated as requested. – Mac's Musings Oct 20 '18 at 22:37
  • Thank you for clarifying the question. – Mac's Musings Oct 21 '18 at 20:42
  • Spot on, +1. It became clear when you flipped the issue from "which apostles are being endorsed" to the question of liberty to avail of any and all of God's legitimate ministers. Thanks so much. – Ruminator Dec 20 '18 at 22:39
  • 1
    Glad to be of some small service to a fellow seeker. – Mac's Musings Dec 20 '18 at 22:52

Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.