5 By these have the isles of the nations been parted in their lands, each by his tongue, by their families, in their nations. (YLT)

This verse (also verse 20 and 31) seems to suggest that God formed the new nations by splitting the new languages by (biological) family group? Is this view correct?

  • The separate areas of land throughout the oceans of the world (the 'isles') were divided among humanity according to their language, according to their ethnic origin and according to their national boundaries. There was a distribution of land on the basis of the three dividing influences - language/ethnicity/geographical location. – Nigel J May 16 '18 at 12:12
  • @Keelan Yes, i meant biological family. – alb May 16 '18 at 23:23
  • 1
    Thanks for the clarification; I edited it into your post and removed my comment. Your question, "is this view correct", does not seem a hermeneutical question however. This site is not concerned with the truth value of the texts, but rather with their meaning. Or did you mean to ask if your understanding of the text is correct? – Keelan May 17 '18 at 6:25

The story of the Tower of Babel follows an account of the genealogy of Noah's descendants in Genesis 10. The story is an attempt to explain and tie into their knowledge of the world and its history their experiences and relationship with God, in particular:

  • the diversity of language the Hebrew people encountered on their travels, especially considering they are all understood to be descendants of Noah;

  • the discovery of advanced and unfamiliar building technologies (in ruins) in the lands around Babylon; and

  • instruction or guidance on how God wants the Hebrew people to live.

If God had randomly split family groups in order to form the new nations, this probably would not have been consistent with the experience of the Hebrew people, who would have noticed in their nomadic situation that nations appeared to be distinguished by geography, then within those lands by language and finally within language groups by genealogy, clan or family group.

They would have encountered a number of family groups in the same location who spoke the same language, but would have noticed that both family groups and language were geographically determined.

According to Genesis, God scattered the people into different nations but kept family groups together, dividing the languages geographically. The story of the Tower of Babel provides an explanation of why God brought about this change in situation from Noah and his three sons embarking from the ark together, to their own experience of many nations and languages.


This seems absolute that the nation's in reference here are divided on these lines of land, tongue , family and nation (Ethnicity) . Language and ethnicity had already then started to develop even before Babel according to the chronology of the Text of Genesis. This would show Babel to perhaps only be referencing a particular segment of Noah's sons as this story is focused around the land of Nimrod son of Cush, son of Ham Son of Noah.

  • I don't think there's anything that indicates Genesis 10 occurred chronologically before Genesis 11. Genesis alternates between narrative and genealogical sections, and while the narratives all follow after each other, the genealogical sections can come before or after the narratives of the people they describe. – curiousdannii Jan 8 at 0:13
  • The probability comes from Gen 10:10 And the beginning of his kingdom was Babel... in the land of Shinar. And that in connection with Gen 11:2 And it came to pass, as they journeyed from the east, that they found a plain in the land of Shinar; and they dwelt there. Nimrod being the great grand son of Noah, places Shinar as being "divided" unto him at his time (Chronos) and while Gen 10: 5, 20, 31 all start with Japheth, Ham and Shem, it is by them a starting point of division is referenced. There is rather nothing indicating Bable as referring anything but language and speech. – Lowther Jan 10 at 0:02

My opinion is that this story preserved old linguistic thoughts. Probably a lot of people thought "What was the first language ever?" or "Why there are so many languages and not just one?" or even "What is the language that God uses?"

This story basically answer those basic questions: According to this story, the mother of all languages is Hebrew, and all other languages had been created by God, by "mixing" this basic language.

Modern linguistics indicates that there are two (maybe three) different "base languages" that all modern languages developed from.

EDIT As @curiousdannii point in his comment, there were more than 3 "base languages" that all modern languages ddeveloped from.

  • 1
    It does not actually say anywhere in the Bible that Hebrew is "the mother of all languages". – fdb Oct 7 '18 at 11:37
  • @fdb Genesis originally did written in (biblical) Hebrew... – A. Meshu Oct 7 '18 at 14:02
  • Given that it was Adam, with the help of Eve probably, that gave names to all the animals, and not God, I think it is plausible that God let Adam and Eve develop their own written language. If so, then the first written language would, most likely, have been an uncomplicated construction in the form of simple pictures, which happened to be preserved by the ancient Chinese. It could be that the confusion of Bable caused various phonetic written languages to be formed. Languages that corresponded to the human race's search for new frontiers. By the way wasn't the originator of Hebrew, Eber? – Constantthin Nov 10 '18 at 4:04
  • 1
    Are you suggesting that Adam and Eve were Chinese? Or that Adam and Eve wrote something? And who is Eber? Maybe try to answer your own answer and when you do that elaborate it more. Good luck!! – A. Meshu Nov 10 '18 at 7:04
  • My comment was just a side note about the written language that the preflood people may have used. Their spoken language could very well be closer to Hebrew than to Chinese. The Chinese and the Hebrews had a common ancestor in either Noa, or one of his children or grandchildren. And Salah was the father of Eber, who was the father of Peleg (Gen 10 and 11). – Constantthin Nov 10 '18 at 14:04

I don’t know that G-d divided the languages by family groups but I can quote the Scripture where it says by what He did divide the nations by

“When the Most High gave to the nations their inheritance, when he divided mankind, he fixed the borders of the peoples according to the number of the sons of G-d.” ‭‭Deuteronomy‬ ‭32:8‬ ‭ESV‬‬

(The MT says according to the sons of Israel but the LXX and the DDS both say sons of Elohim or Elyon. That is confusing because Israel did not exist when the nations were divided and Abraham was not even yet chosen)

If in fact it was divided by the sons of Elohim then the questions arises how many are there? And how many sons of Elohim were apportioned to each nation? One each, two ...?!?

The speculation is that Genesis 10 lists 72(70) families descending from Noah so the assumption is that there are 72(or 70 depending on the spelling of names) nations and languages.

Genesis 10:5 is curious because Genesis 11 says there was only one language one the earth

“From these the coastland peoples spread in their lands, each with his own language, by their clans, in their nations.” ‭‭Genesis‬ ‭10:5‬ ‭ESV‬‬


“Now the whole earth had one language and the same words.” ‭‭Genesis‬ ‭11:1‬ ‭ESV‬‬

So in my mind verse 5 comes after or because of the Tower of Babel and should be seen in that light.


Asking "what came first" does not give an accurate portrayal of reality. Many things change in many small ways simultaneously. Over time, cultures and languages of relatively isolated people drift apart until we consider them to be different. There wasn't necessarily ever a cataclysmic event that suddenly changed everything overnight.

The Tower story was likely spuriously inserted among the geneologies as a post-hoc explanation for why people speak different languages. As with other Biblical interpolations, the redaction interrupts the flow of the surrounding text. Without the story, the geneologies read seamlessly as a continuous text.

Genesis has multiple cycles of construction and destruction. During the construction phase, an action of man is declared wicked, Yahweh destroys it, and the cycle repeats.

Gen 10 concludes the Flood story with the scattering of nations and a set of geneologies. Although Biblical geneologies may appear to be about individual people, they often really describe entire nations. (Recall 1Tim 1:3-4, ... so you may tell them not to teach other doctrines, nor myths and endless geneologies...) In the context of the Flood, it appears the initial division was by ancestry, from which different languages developed.

The next (short) cycle, in Gen 11, is the building of the Tower. Apologists often claim that the builders' crime is pride or disobedience, when they say, let us build a tower into the heavens, let us make a name for ourselves, let us not be scattered across the earth (Gen 11:4). But in modern vernacular, the builders are saying, let's build and name a city (make a name for ourselves) so that we can live together (not be scattered). "Tower into the heavens" is equivalent to the modern "skyscraper". Heavens is just another way to refer to the sky. "Into the heavens" is likely just an idiom meaning really high. (Recall Gen 1:20, Let birds fly above the earth across the dome of the heavens. Many translations say, across the sky.)

The crime, in Yahweh's eyes, is cooperation because (Gen 11:6) if as one people, speaking one language, they can accomplish this, nothing would be beyond them. As with the Flood, the story ends with the scattering of nations. In this case, division in speech appears to precede the development of nations. Another set of geneologies follows.

  • The 'crime' is not so much cooperation, but the pursuit of knowledge for its own sake: isolated from understanding, wisdom, awe, reverence, etc., knowledge is a dangerous thing. Deprived of a common language, humanity was forced to work on understanding as well as wonder and awe, reverence, courage, discernment, wisdom, etc in order to rebuild our knowledge to its full potential. Unfortunately, we still have yet to fully grasp this early lesson... – Possibility Oct 8 '18 at 9:07
  • @Possibility Your claim is not supported by the text. – xiota Oct 8 '18 at 18:03
  • Yours is not, it only appears that way. Think about it: why would cooperation be a crime? Is this consistent with what the rest of the bible teaches? Surely cooperation (love) is what we should be striving for? Understanding was given later (Deut. 29:4; 1 Kings 3:9) through Solomon, as was wisdom and discernment. Thinking they could build a tower to reach heaven demonstrated knowledge or skill without understanding - these days we should understand by now that this is not how you reach heaven. Removing their ability to understand each other reflected this lack of understanding. – Possibility Oct 9 '18 at 13:20
  • 1
    "cooperation (love)" ... Now you're just making stuff up. – xiota Oct 9 '18 at 15:18
  • 1
    Quoting Xiota, "The Tower story was likely spuriously inserted among the geneologies as a post-hoc explanation for why people speak different languages.". Why are you engaged in hermeneutics if you believe that parts of Scripture are spurious? There is no stability of evidence, let alone facts, to discuss. – Lowther Jan 7 at 19:28

Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.