3

Isaiah 40:1-2 (KJV)

1 Comfort ye, comfort ye my people, saith your God. 2 Speak ye comfortably to Jerusalem, and cry unto her, that her warfare is accomplished, that her iniquity is pardoned: for she hath received of the LORD's hand double for all her sins.

The tone in this chapter seems to be consolatory but the double is not clear to which it refers to.

There seems to be some ambiguity in the above text

Does this refer to double chastisement for sins committed or double recompense after iniquity had been pardoned?

1
  • “Double” could simply be synonymous with “an eye for an eye”. Dec 3 '20 at 13:32
2

Double Chastisement (Payment/Recompense) for Jerusalem's Sins

The prophetic cry of Isa 40:1-2 follows Isaiah's declaration to Hezekiah about the coming judgment from Babylon in Isa 39:5-7 (NKJV):

5 Then Isaiah said to Hezekiah, “Hear the word of the LORD of hosts: 6 ‘Behold, the days are coming when all that is in your house, and what your fathers have accumulated until this day, shall be carried to Babylon; nothing shall be left,’ says the LORD. 7 ‘And they shall take away some of your sons who will descend from you, whom you will beget; and they shall be eunuchs in the palace of the king of Babylon.’”

While this prophetic judgment was in response to Hezekiah's opening the palace for Babylonian inspection (39:1-4), Hezekiah is (smugly?) pleased that it is not coming in his days (39:8).

But following the prophecy of judgment by Babylon and Hezekiah's reaction, Isaiah at some point (it may not have been immediately then) also gave this prophecy of comfort in chapter 40, which also declares the extent of Jerusalem's payment to be "double for all her sins."

Fast-forward to Jeremiah's day, when things are rapidly approaching this fulfillment of Babylon's conquest. Jeremiah gives a specific prophecy about a time frame in Jer 25:11-12

11 And this whole land shall be a desolation and an astonishment, and these nations shall serve the king of Babylon seventy years. 12 ‘Then it will come to pass, when seventy years are completed, that I will punish the king of Babylon and that nation, the land of the Chaldeans, for their iniquity,’ says the LORD; ‘and I will make it a perpetual desolation

The key here is the seventy years the "land shall be a desolation."1 The beginning of this comes to pass in Jeremiah's day with Babylon's destruction of Jerusalem in 586 B.C., but as learned in the book of Haggai, the land does not start producing again until the completion of the Temple has been done (Hag 2:15-19), which is in 516 B.C. (70 years).

But though the Temple is done, Jerusalem itself is still uninhabited until the rebuilding of the walls by Nehemiah, which is another 70 years later, in 445 B.C., and so double the amount of time that the rest of the land of Israel.

Isaiah's prophecy was thus of Jerusalem having to lay desolate for twice the time of the rest of the land for her sins, but in his prophecy, that payment time is past (hence the comfort), and so Israel is to be looking then for the one noted in Isa 40:3, the coming of the one preceding the coming of the LORD himself:

The voice of one crying in the wilderness: “Prepare the way of the LORD; Make straight in the desert A highway for our God.

Iniquity is pardoned, their God is coming—take comfort.

[P.S. I have more I want to add in details above, but no time now, so I'll have to come back to it.]


1 The 70 years of the land is a different period from the 70 years of service to the king of Babylon. The land's desolation, as discussed above, is from 586 B.C. (destruction of Jerusalem) to 516 B.C. (completion of 2nd Temple), while the service is from 605 B.C. (the 1st deportation to Babylon) to 535 B.C. (the return by Zerubbabel and the laying of the 2nd Temple's foundation).

2

The meaning is double chastisement, not double recompense. This matches the imagery of Isaiah 51:17, which describes Jerusalem as having drunk a cup of wrath from God's hand (as in this verse).

If recompense for punishment were meant, it wouldn't have been described as "for all her sins"; obviously, recompense isn't for sins, but for the punishments, and punishments are not mentioned. Contrast Joel 2:25, which promises recompense for years of famine, not for sins.

The translation "for all her sins" comes from the words בְּכָל חַטֹּאתֶיהָ. The preposition "for" (-בְּ) is used elsewhere in connection with sins in a number of places in the Bible with the meaning of punishment: אִישׁ בְּחֶטְאוֹ יוּמָתוּ, "each man will die for his sin" (Deuteronomy 24:16); בַּעֲו‍ֹן בִּצְעוֹ קָצַפְתִּי וְאַכֵּהוּ "for his sin I was angry and struck him" (Isaiah 57:17); בַּעֲוֺנוֹ יָמוּת, "for his sin he will die" (three times nearly identically in Ezekiel 3:18-20). The meaning is thus likely to be the same here.

What is stressed in these verses is the idea of comfort, but not of recompense.

1

In the portuguese version BPT Edição Comum the passage is clearer for me

Falem ao coração de Jerusalém e proclamem que acabaram os seus trabalhos forçados e está pago o seu crime; que já recebeu do Senhor o dobro do castigo pelos seus pecados.

which translates to something within these lines

Speak to the heart of Jerusalem and proclaim that your forced labor is over and your crime is paid for; who has already received twice the punishment from the Lord for his sins.

It reads that the forced works ended because the Lord received double as much work than originally expected. So we'd be speaking of your first case - double chastisement for sins committed.

The word used here for "double" is Strong's H3718 - kephel and can be seen here, in Job 11:6 (KJV)

And that he would shew thee the secrets of wisdom, that they are double to that which is! Know therefore that God exacteth of thee less than thine iniquity deserveth.

and Job 41:13 (KJV)

Who can discover the face of his garment? or who can come to him with his double bridle?

Whether this double means really "double" I have my doubts since the passage seems to indicate "more than necessary".

1
  • 1
    Very Good answer. +1.
    – Dottard
    Dec 2 '20 at 20:28
0

Recently, I heard a very interesting explanation for this apparent reference to 'double chastisement.'In ancient Israel, it was incumbent on debtors to write the full amount of their debt on a piece of parchment, (eg), and attach it to an outside part of their dwelling, in full view of whoever passed by. If a person of standing, seeing it, were to decide, as an act of generosity, to pay off the debt, they would then fold the piece over as a sign that it had been paid. In fact, (I am told), the Hebrew actually talks about 'the double', in specific reference to this practice. This would make more sense, (for me, anyway), as instead of portraying God in a harsh and vengeful light, exacting more than was the due penalty for the sin, it shows that He Himself has borne the cost of it. Like much of Isaiah, in fact, looking forward to the redemptive sacrifice of Christ.

2
  • Hi Helen Stengel, welcome! Thank you for your contribution. Personally it wasn't the easiest to read answer due to its format, but I also didn't know how to make it better Dec 2 '20 at 16:41
  • Hello Helen - are you able to provide any Bible (or other) references to support your assertions and argument?
    – Dottard
    Dec 4 '20 at 19:50

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.