5

1 Kings 20:31-32:

31 His servants said to him, “Behold now, we have heard that the kings of the house of Israel are merciful kings, please let us put sackcloth on our loins and ropes on our heads, and go out to the king of Israel; perhaps he will save your [p]life.” 32 So they girded sackcloth on their loins and put ropes on their heads, and came to the king of Israel and said, “Your servant Ben-hadad says, ‘Please let me live.’” And he said, “Is he still alive? He is my brother.

What did he mean by that? And why did he say that? And why did he consider that a reason to let him live?

1
  • It's like in today's slang/ebonics, you might call someone "brother", "bro", "sister, "sis", etc. That's all. Commented May 21, 2021 at 3:18

2 Answers 2

4

The word "brother" is commonly used in peace treaties. Here are some Hittite-Egyptian examples (not exactly contemporary, but still useful):

Treaty between the Hittites and Egypt (1280 BCE) (ANET p. 199):

... while he is in brotherhood with me and he is at peace with me, and I am in brotherhood with him and I am at peace with him forever.

Treaty between Hattusilis and Ramses II (13th century) (ANET p. 202):

Treaty of Rea-mashesha mai Amana ... with Hattusilis ... his brother, for establishing [good] peace [and] good brotherhood... Now I have established good brotherhood (and) good peace between us forever.

When Moses tries to pass peacefully through Edom (Numbers 20:14), he speaks in the name of "your brother Israel." Amos (1:9) also adjures Tyre for forgetting the "covenant of brothers," connecting the two words.

I would guess that the language of "brotherhood" is used to give a sense of a treaty being between equals, rather than one side forcing it on the other. Since Aram became more powerful shortly after Ahab's death, he might not have had a choice in the matter.

In the specific context of peace between Israel and Aram, "he is my brother" might hearken back to the family relationship between Jacob and Laban (called his brother in Genesis 29:12,15, 31:46), who themselves made a treaty a long time earlier not to pass Gilead (Galed, or Jegar-sahadutha) in order to do wrong to one another (31:44-54).

0

" And Ben-hadad said unto him, The cities, which my father took from thy father, I will restore; and thou shalt make streets for thee in Damascus, as my father made in Samaria. Then said Ahab, I will send thee away with this covenant. So he made a covenant with him, and sent him away."

We know that they had no common father.

1
  • 1
    Your answer could be improved with additional supporting information. Please edit to add further details, such as citations or documentation, so that others can confirm that your answer is correct. You can find more information on how to write good answers in the help center.
    – Community Bot
    Commented May 5 at 3:02

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.