3

Unstable as water thou shalt not excel; because thou wentest up to thy father's bed then defiledst thou it: he went up to my couch (Gen 49:4)

Throughout Jacobs prophecy in Gen 49, he describes his sons using animals and in the case of Joseph he used a plant.

  • Judah was described as a lion

  • Benjamin was described as a wolf

  • Dan was described as a serpent

But why is Reuben described using an inanimate entity like water?

2

I see the Hebrew of Genesis 49:4 like this:

Volatile like water, you will leave no remnant. When you went up to the bed chamber of your father, then you profaned the increase of my bed.

Details: enter image description here

The Hebrew word פַּ֤חַז is understood by Strong as meaning "ebullition, i.e. froth (figuratively, lust): unstable.", an idea also having the support of Gesenius: enter image description here

Water is unstable - volitile - because it will boil away and leave nothing behind. This is why Jacob then chooses the word תּוֹתַ֔ר, which is clearly related to something that is left over or remains.

The fulfillment of Jacob's words concerning his son Reuben can be found unmistakably declared in 1 Chronicles:

Now the sons of Reuben the firstborn of Israel, (for he was the firstborn; but, forasmuch as he defiled his father's bed, his birthright was given unto the sons of Joseph the son of Israel: and the genealogy is not to be reckoned after the birthright.
-- 1 Chronicles 5:1 (KJV)

Jacob, with heavenly insight, could see that Reuben's lack of reverence for the sanctity of the bedroom of his father would have long term consequences for his (Reuben's) progeny.

  • Yes, Reuben's lack of respect held dire consequences for his household. Also, his character was 'fluid'-like water; consequently the Lord chose Judah who was resolute in his purposes(like a lion), vs Reuben (like water), constantly shifting and moving with every whim. – Tau Jan 4 '18 at 11:31
2

First of all, on 12 sons of Jacob, only a half of them were represented by animals, or, in one case (Joseph) by a plant (tree?). Five of them (Simeon and Levi, Zabulon, Gad, and Asher) had no animal/botanical comparisons applied to them. So, I don't find it strange that Reuben was described with 'water/s'.

The purpose of Jacob, in this cases, was to find something in the creation that would serve as 'elements of comparison' to correspond with some prevalent characteristics of some of his sons (like we do until today when we say to a son of us, e.g. 'you are as stubborn as a mule').

In regards to the term פחז, it is very likely that it is related to the concept of 'insolence', 'arrogance' (or similar terms). Would be strange, instead, translate it with the concept of 'to boil', as an euphemistical verbal form to indicate the Reuben's arousal inclination. Why? Well, this supposed erotic connotation is absent from the context of other Bible passages which use this term, expecially Judges 9:4, and Jeremiah 23:32.

A final point. Two related terms in Akkadian language support the connexion of this Hebrew term with the concept of 'insolence', 'arrogance'. In fact, PAHAZU (in neo-Assyrian) means 'to be arrogant, high-handed'; and PAHHUZU (in neo-Babylonian) means 'cad', 'scoundrel' (Chicago Assyrian Dictionary, XII:32-33).

I hope this will be useful for you.

  • could you explain what "arrogant like water" means according to your novel interpretation? – Bach Jan 28 '18 at 15:16
  • I'm happy to help you. The same idea ('arrogant like water') we may find in Job 38:11 (compare it, please, with Pro 8:29).There, IEUE speaks to Job pointing him a lot of physical phenomena, included the 'sea' (vs. 8). And, in the 11th verse, we can see IEUE connects the sea waters with the concept of 'proudness' (ASV, KJV, NAB, NJB) – Saro Fedele Jan 28 '18 at 15:31
1

The simplest answer to your question of "why is Reuben described using an inanimate entity like water?" is that unlike his brothers who are blessed and likened to various fierce and kingly animals, Reuben is rebuked and criticized for acting impetuously, there is no point in likening him to any animal, since the object is to degrade him for his foolish acts.

However there is something else you need to know (which might change your perspective). I noticed that you accepted the translation of פחז as unstable to be the proper one. Indeed most English translations choose this translation to be the correct one. However, the Jewish translators chose to translate this word as "rushing" or "hastiness" which in this case (פחז כמים) will read something like: "water-like rushing/hastiness". In other words because Reuben rushed like water to lay with his fathers concubine Bilhah he lost his firstborn rights; his rash imprudent decision is what caused him to lose out. The Stone edition (a Jewish translation) translates similarly, "water-like impetuosity", which is basically the same thing.

The truth his that the word פחז (which is pronounced "pachaz") is not found anywhere else in the bible. The word appears once more in Judges 9:4 (אנשים רקים ופוחזים), but it does not shed any light on its true meaning. Since there are no other words to juxtapose פחז with, the translators translate according to their own understanding based on the context of the verse coupled with common sense. However, Nachmanides a famous Jewish commentator suggests that the closest word to פחז is the Hebrew word חפזון (which is pronounced "chipazon") which sounds very much like it, only the order of the letters "peh" and "chet" are reversed (in English it would be like the similarity between "rebel" and "barrel", though their meaning are wholly different). The word חפזון is found numerous times in the bible and is translated by most as "hasty" or "in haste" (see for example Exodus 12:11). Similarly the word פחז would be translated as "hastiness". Jewish literature (Talmud and Midrash) is also full of references to פחז and they're all found in such a setting. The word פוחזים found in Judges (ibid) can also be translated "impetuous" accordingly; indeed this flows very well with the preceding word "רקים" which means empty, thus rendering: "empty and impetuous people", a euphemism for "bums".

I think that the evidence strongly points to the Jewish translation of פחז as "rushing", "hasty" or "impetuous". This fits very nicely with the context of Reuben acting impetuously to lay with his fathers concubine and thus losing out his birthright.

0

Water is the first natural substance mentioned in Scripture:

The earth was without form and void, and darkness was over the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God was hovering over the face of the waters. (Genesis 1:2) [ESV throughout]

The creation of the earth begin from water:

And God said, “Let there be an expanse in the midst of the waters, and let it separate the waters from the waters.” And God made the expanse and separated the waters that were under the expanse from the waters that were above the expanse. And it was so. And God called the expanse Heaven. And there was evening and there was morning, the second day. And God said, “Let the waters under the heavens be gathered together into one place, and let the dry land appear.” And it was so. (Genesis 1:6-9)

Beginning the prophecy of Reuben, the firstborn, with water parallels creation. In other words, Jacob begins by using water with his firstborn just as God begin using water in the creation of the earth. The use of animals in the prophecies of the sons who came after Reuben also follows the sequence of creation.

Water maybe "lifeless" yet besides being essential for life, it was the physical location for the first type of animal life:

So God created the great sea creatures and every living creature that moves, with which the waters swarm... (Genesis 1:21)

Again there is a parallel with the firstborn son who is supposed to be the person who preserves and continues the family name. However, Reuben defiled his father's bed. There is a prophetic parallel in Revelation:

Then I saw a new heaven and a new earth, for the first heaven and the first earth had passed away, and the sea was no more. (Revelation 21:1)

And he said to me, “It is done! I am the Alpha and the Omega, the beginning and the end. To the thirsty I will give from the spring of the water of life without payment. (Revelation 22:6)

The "sea" named on the third day of creation is no more (it was "unstable") and is replaced by the spring of the water of life.

Also, water is used symbolically in prophecy to represent people:

therefore, behold, the LORD is bringing up against them the waters of the River, mighty and many, the king of Assyria and all his glory. And it will rise over all its channels and go over all its banks (Isaiah 8:7)

And the angel said to me, “The waters that you saw, where the prostitute is seated, are peoples and multitudes and nations and languages. (Revelation 17:15)

Finally, water may be lifeless, but it is associated with eternal life:

Then the angel showed me the river of the water of life, bright as crystal, flowing from the throne of God and of the Lamb (Revelation 22:1)

but whoever drinks of the water that I will give him will never be thirsty again. The water that I will give him will become in him a spring of water welling up to eternal life.” (John 4:14)

One could say the first prophecy which is about the unstable waters of Reuben is replaced by the living waters of eternal life offered by Jesus.

  • I really appreciate this answer. The way creation is linked to the family of Jacob. +1 – user20490 Dec 4 '17 at 20:50
-1

Water of course can be easily moved and can take on various shapes and forms. I think this therefore represents the unstable nature of Rueben...My question would be about the defiling of his fathers bed and what that entails. The answer to this question may be contained in scripture already but I personally am not aware of the information.

  • 1
    Thanks Greg. But what you wrote above qualifies as a comment and not an answer. – user20490 Dec 4 '17 at 15:30
  • 1
    I don't want to down vote it cos it would restrict your access to this site. Take the site tour. – user20490 Dec 4 '17 at 15:31
  • 1
    This is only a partial answer and therefore likely to be downvoted. To answer fully, you would need to compare the characterizations of all of the sons of Israel to see if there is any common theme such as animate objects to which this characterization is an exception. You also need to explain how this characterization fits the context of the verse. – Abu Munir Ibn Ibrahim Dec 4 '17 at 15:56
  • Did I say something untrue? – Greg Dec 4 '17 at 17:13
  • 1
    Upon further research I have found that Reuben laid with Bilhah his fathers concubine... – Greg Dec 4 '17 at 17:36
-1

Reuben wavered.

He said he would offer his own sons as sacrifice, in the end it was Judah who offered himself.

He said he wanted to save Joseph but in the end he didn’t.

He slept with his fathers wife.

  • 1
    This does not qualify as an answer. This is a comment. There's no attempt to show your hermeneutical approach to the question. – user20490 Dec 4 '17 at 20:54

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.