Bible neither claims that Enoch "lived" nor that he left the earth. It clearly and pointedly states exactly the opposite on both those counts :
ALL these died in faith, without receiving the promises, but having seen and welcomed them from a distance, and having confessed that they were strangers and exiles ON THE EARTH.
Hebrews 11:13 NASB
referring to Enoch in verse 5
'... and Enoch walked (וַיִּתְהַלֵּ֨ךְ) with god ...' Genesis 5:22
'... and Enoch walked (וַיִּתְהַלֵּ֥ךְ) with god ...' Genesis 5:24
Elohim had walked or 'fellowshipped' with Adam and Eve in the garden :
Then the man and his wife heard the sound of the Lord God as he was walking (מִתְהַלֵּ֥ךְ) in the garden in the cool of the day ...
Genesis 3:8 NIV
Direct interaction between elohim and the faithful, and the wicked, was a feature after the ejection from Eden :
After he drove the man out, he placed on the east side of the Garden of Eden cherubim and a flaming sword flashing back and forth to guard the way to the tree of life.
Genesis 3:24 NIV
Then the Lord said to Cain ...
Then the Lord said to Cain ...
Cain said to the Lord, “My punishment is more than I can bear. Today you are driving me from the land, and I will be hidden from your presence ..."
Genesis 4:6,9,13-14 NIV
However this fellowship, or judgement, was withdrawn before the flood :
Then the Lord said, “My Spirit will not contend with (or judge - יָד֨וֹן - as with Cain) humans forever, for they are mortal (בָשָׂ֑ר - corrupt); their days will be a hundred and twenty years.”
Genesis 6:3 NIV
The tree of life being lost to us in this flood, the cherubim no longer being required.
Concomitantly, elohim became infrequent visitors.
'Enoch was translated ...' Hebrews 11:5
'... was not found because God had translated him ...' Hebrews 11:5
'... before the translation ...' Hebrews 11:5
Translation in this case - μεταθέσεως - indicates a geographical move. Same word in Acts 7:16 referencing the movement of human remains from Egypt to Shechem.
Moreover, the span of Enoch's life is clearly stated.
And Enoch lived 65 years - and begat Methusaleh ...
... and Enoch walked (there's that word 'fellowshipped') with God after he begat Methusaleh, three hundred years - and begat sons and daughters ...
... and ALL the days of Enoch were, three hundred and sixty-five years ...
Genesis 5:21,22,23 Rotherham
After Enoch had produced the next heir in the line of Seth when he was 65 years old, his participation in that process no longer being necessary, he was 'translated' or moved away from that environment, to a location not specified, where from that point on, he walked or 'fellowshipped' with elohim as Adam and Eve had, and so lived out the remainder of his days, being another 300 years, in which time he had further sons and daughters.
I don't even know how anyone could even accidentally miss all those "words" ...
Why?
Witness protection elohim style.
Lines of Cain and Seth.
Woe to them! They have taken the way of Cain ... Enoch, the seventh from Adam, prophesied about them ... and of all the defiant words ... they boast about themselves and flatter others for their own advantage.
Jude 1:11,14,15,16 NIV
Enoch, seventh from Adam via Seth - Genesis 5
Lamech, seventh from Adam via Cain - Genesis 4:16-18
'... all the defiant words ... they boast about themselves and flatter others for their own advantage ...' :
Lamech said to his wives, “Adah and Zillah, listen to me; wives of Lamech, hear my words. I have killed (הָרַ֙גְתִּי֙) a man for wounding me, a young man for injuring me. If Cain is avenged seven times, then Lamech seventy-seven times.”
Genesis 4:23,24 NIV
The AKJV has a marginal reference for "have killed" being "would kill".
From elsewhere :
I would certainly have killed (הָרַ֖גְתִּי) you by now ...
Numbers 22:33 NIV
These are defiant words and nothing else.
It's Genesis 3:15 playing out. There being a distinct separation of those that obeyed elohim - styled the sons or children of god, and those that followed the way of Cain.
That distinct division being punctuated by violence and ultimately broken in Genesis 6 (verses 1 through 8) with regard to intermarriage. Hence god's disappointment and final judgement.
This entropy further increasing in the threefold division after the flood in the descendents of Noah and the scattering at the tower.
ALL these died in faith, without receiving the promises, but having seen and welcomed them from a distance, and having confessed that they were strangers and exiles ON THE EARTH.
Hebrews 11:13 NASB
referring to Enoch in verse 5
Died in faith when he turned up his feet, and not by the hand of Lamech 300 years earlier in spite of his boast.
Moved, out of harms way, away from the grasp of a man who would recompense the wounding he inherited from Cain, on the line of Seth.
Enoch was translated, so as not to see death, and was not found, because that, God, had translated him ...
Hebrews 11:5 Rotherham
Was not found by Lamech and therefore did not see death by the hand of Lamech at that time.
I have to assume the scapegoat for this oversight is the repetition of the distinctive feature of Enoch's life provided as summary.
... and Enoch walked with God,––and was not, for God had taken him.
Genesis 5:24 Rotherham
The casual reader perhaps concluding that at the end of Enoch's life he walked with god.
However, this is clearly a revisiting of earlier events :
And Enoch lived 65 years - and begat Methusaleh ...
... and Enoch walked with God after he begat Methusaleh, three hundred years - and begat sons and daughters ...
... and all the days of Enoch were, three hundred and sixty-five years ...
Genesis 5:21,22,23 Rotherham
A plain, unambiguous record of the pertinent features of his life and then a declaration of death.
This distinctive feature of his life provided in summary not only in Genesis but also in Hebrews. In both cases the summary or refrain belonging to the events immediately following his fathering Methusaleh.
Indicated by :
'... and Enoch walked with God, after he begat Methuselah, three hundred years,––and begat sons and daughters ...' Genesis 5:22
'... and Enoch walked with God,––and was not, for God had taken him.' Genesis 5:24
This verse 24 being a summary.
To suggest otherwise is to suggest that Enoch was translated twice.
Genesis and Hebrews agree in these matters.
And Enoch lived, sixty–five years,––and begat Methuselah ...
... for, before the translation, he had received witness that he had become well–pleasing unto (or rendered service to - εὐαρεστηκέναι) God ...
Genesis 5:21, Hebrews 11:5 Rotherham
... and Enoch walked with God, after he begat Methuselah, three hundred years,––and begat sons and daughters ...
Enoch was translated, so as not to see death (at that time), and was not found (by Lamech who consequently, was unable to make good on his threat), because that, God, had translated him ...
... and Enoch walked with God,––and was not, for God had taken him.
Genesis 5:22, Hebrews 11:5, Genesis 5:24 Rotherham
verse 24 being a re-statement of verse 22 as the defining feature of his life
... and all the days of Enoch were, three hundred and sixty–five years ...
... all these died––not bearing away the promises, but, from afar, beholding and saluting them, and confessing that, strangers and sojourners, were they upon the land (or earth - γῆς) .
Genesis 5:23, Hebrews 11:13 Rotherham
... sin entered the world through one man, and death through sin, and in this way death came to all people, because all sinned ...
... death reigned from the time of Adam to the time of Moses ...
Romans 5:12,14 NIV
This Enoch stuff is a nonsense. Always has been and always will be.