2 samuel 6:23 (KJV)

23 Therefore Michal the daughter of Saul had no child unto the day of her death.

2 samuel 21:7-9 (KJV)

7 But the king spared Mephibosheth, the son of Jonathan the son of Saul, because of the LORD'S oath that was between them, between David and Jonathan the son of Saul. 8 But the king took the two sons of Rizpah the daughter of Aiah, whom she bare unto Saul, Armoni and Mephibosheth; and the five sons of Michal the daughter of Saul, whom she brought up for Adriel the son of Barzillai the Meholathite: 9 And he delivered them into the hands of the Gibeonites, and they hanged them in the hill before the LORD: and they fell all seven together, and were put to death in the days of harvest, in the first days, in the beginning of barley harvest.

It would seem in 2 samuel 6 Michal the the daughter of King Saul died without conceiving but later the same Michal is mentioned as having five sons,or is that Saul had another daughter named Michal as well?

  • 1
    What do you make of "whom she brought up for Adriel the son of Barzillai the Meholathite" in the text you have quoted? If they were sons of her own flesh, would such words be used to describe them? – enegue Nov 24 '16 at 7:01
  • 2
    Every other translation says Merab rather than Michal. I assume there's an answer through textual criticism. – curiousdannii Nov 24 '16 at 7:20

As a commenter notes, there is a text-critical issue here.

The Masoretic Text of the Hebrew Bible plainly reads "Michal" at this point. However, as the textual notes to the Biblia Hebraica Stuttargtensia indicate, there are two Hebrew manuscripts that read "Merob", and there is some support for this among Septuagint manuscripts, too:


P. Kyle McCarter comments on this textual situation in his II Samuel Anchor Bible commentary (p. 439) this way:


For this reason, almost all modern versions read "Merab" here, in light of 1 Sam 18:19, as well as the tradition of Michal's childessness. There are dissenting voices: see, e.g., J. J. Glück, "Merab or Michal", Zeitschrift für die Alttestamentliche Wissenschaft 77/1 (1965), 72–81, who argues for the retention of Michal.

This is where the vast majority of modern scholars, translators, and commentators are content to leave it: that 2 Sam 21:8 contains a "slip" (S.R. Driver calls it a "lapsus calami") confusing the names of Michal and Merab which is then corrected.

The KJV's "whom she brought up for Adriel" may itself represent an attempt to deal with the perceived problem, since that is a dodgy translation, to put it bluntly. The Hebrew here, אֲשֶׁ֥ר יָלְדָ֛ה לְעַדְרִיאֵ֥ל, plainly means "whom she had borne to Adriel" (cf. BDB sub ילד). Older commentators spotted the problem, but got round it -- in the case of both Rashi and Matthew Henry, from very different times and traditions -- by supposing that although the five sons must have been born to Merab, they were raised by her sister, the childless Michal, thus following the same line of reasoning which gives rise to the KJV's mistranslation.

| improve this answer | |
  • Is Adriel feminine or masculine? That is, if it is a man whom she bore sons to then this contradicts the earlier account even more if we take it as the same Michal, or it adds support to the idea it is a different woman, Merab. If it is feminine then it would support the theory of Rashi and Henry and others. I don't know Hebrew... – Joshua Nov 25 '16 at 2:46
  • @Joshua - Adriel is a man (cf. 1 Sam 18:19). – Dɑvïd Nov 25 '16 at 8:22

I would agree certainly that Michal 'brought up' the children, because that is what is stated in the Masoretic text, however precisely who bore the children is the question here, given that by no means was 'Merab' the only potential candidate, given the possibility of concubines that Adriel may have had. Since otherwise Michal would have had roughly only eight years to beget five children by an assumed adultery with Adriel(that is, the amount of time since David was betrothed to her[1Sa 18:27] + the amount of time David was with the Philistines[1 year - 1Sa 27:7] + the amount of time he was in Hebron[7 years], at which time he took her back[2Sa 3:13,6:23]), it seems most likely that, in answer to going childless, she bore them for Adriel, her sister's husband, 'on her knees' as it were, probably by way of one of his concubines(in likeness of the jealousies between Leah and Rachel, bearing children by concubines in order that they might be the more respected, also Gen. 16:2,30:3).

On another note, the Bishops' 1568 comment on 2 Samuel 21:8's Michal's five children, "That is, whom she(having no children of her owne) brought up, being the children of Adriel, by Merab her sister", shows that the idea of Michal as a surrogate mother was by no means exclusive to the KJV 1611.

| improve this answer | |
  • "I would agree certainly that Michal 'brought up' the children, because that is what is stated in the Masoretic text..." - No, that's expressly what the MT does not say. The vast majority of "MT" manuscripts say Michal gave birth to the children. | The Bishop's Bible note is interesting: clearly this was the standard interpretation to alleviate the discrepancy. – Dɑvïd Nov 25 '16 at 8:15
  • That part of the answer did refer to 'Michal'(emphasized), not the verb, however you choose to translate it. If I thought it had meant only 'raised', I wouldn't have tried to connect it to the surrogate mother argument. – user123943 Nov 25 '16 at 8:36
  • Ah - I see. (A teensy bit confusing for me, as you can tell! ;) ) – Dɑvïd Nov 25 '16 at 9:09
  • Welcome to Biblical Hermeneutics Stack Exchange, thanks for contributing! Be sure to take our site tour to learn more about us. We're a little different from other sites. – Steve Taylor Dec 2 '16 at 14:42

After David danced with all his might, Michal spoke to him concerning his passionate zeal for the Lord and the testimony of the Lord. And David answered her, making it clear that he did not receive her attitude.

From that time unto she died, Michal had no child. But it is not said she was barren. She just had no child. David and she never had a child.

Instead, she brought up five on behalf of Adriel. Scripture does not state why she did so, only that she did so.

That is all we know.

Except we know that the King, not named by his personal name, for he did it in the capacity of his appointed office, took them and delivered them to the Gibeonites, who hanged them and they were put to death.

| improve this answer | |

She was not the maternal mother. She raised them for Adriel. I thought this was a no brainer. Bishops Bible supports the KJV. It's no surprise to me.

| improve this answer | |
  • 1
    Welcome to the BH site, Preacher Anthony. We are looking for more elaborate answers here. Your answer is interesting, but it is looking rather like a comment. Please take this tour and edit your answer accordingly. – Constantin Jinga Aug 4 '18 at 17:07

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.