Fairly self explanatory. Obviously not looking for doctrinal answers, just textual evidence to support / refute this question.

"21 “Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only the one who does the will of my Father in heaven. 22 On that day many will say to me, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name, and cast out demons in your name, and do many deeds of power in your name?’ 23 Then I will declare to them, ‘I never knew you; go away from me, you evildoers.’"


It would seem from the passage in question that calling on the name of Jesus is all that is needed in order to perform great miracles. According to Matthew, the 'false prophets' were able to perform miracles (variously translated as 'wonderful works' or 'deeds of power') and exorcise demons merely by calling on the name of Jesus, even though they were not true Christians and did not believe in Christ.

Ulrich Luz (Studies in Matthew, pages 128-9) says that Matthew "presupposes in the community charismatic activity of which the Evangelist is evidently critical. But he is himself - at least as far as his basically positive attitude to miracles is concerned - not all that far from the charismatics he is attacking." This is to say that at the time the Gospel was written there must have been people, whom the Evangelist regarded as not true Christians, who claimed to perform miracles in the name of Jesus. Matthew does not dispute that the miracles were real, but insists they were able to perform these miracles merely by using Jesus' name, but without his divine authority.

| improve this answer | |

Logically, if X implies Y, it is not necessarily true that not X implies not Y. For example: (a) Birds can eat; (b) I am not a bird; (c) therefore I cannot eat. The preceding is clearly fallacious (fallacy of the inverse). The fact that some can do miracles in Jesus' name does not logically imply that it is not possible to do miracles without invoking Jesus name.

| improve this answer | |
  • Thank you for the comment. A more logically sound way to ask the question then would probably be "Is it possible to perform exorcisms or miracles solely by invoking Jesus' name?" that way it is not limiting in nature. Thank you for the clarification. – JacobOsborne Oct 19 '16 at 22:07
  • 1
    I normally don't comment on answers to questions I have also answered, but is this answer "Based on Matt 7:21-23" as required by the question? – Dick Harfield Oct 20 '16 at 5:39

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.