8

In Acts 7:43, it is written,

43 Yea, ye took up the tabernacle of Moloch, and the star of your god Remphan, figures which ye made to worship them: and I will carry you away beyond Babylon. KJV, 1769

ΜΓʹ καὶ ἀνελάβετε τὴν σκηνὴν τοῦ Μολὸχ καὶ τὸ ἄστρον τοῦ θεοῦ ὑμῶν Ῥεμφὰν, τοὺς τύπους οὓς ἐποιήσατε προσκυνεῖν αὐτοῖς καὶ μετοικιῶ ὑμᾶς ἐπέκεινα Βαβυλῶνος TR, 1550

In Amos 5:27 in which it is written,

27 Therefore will I cause you to go into captivity beyond Damascus, saith the LORD, whose name is The God of hosts. KJV, 1769

ΚΖʹ καὶ μετοικιῶ ὑμᾶς ἐπέκεινα Δαμασκοῦ λέγει κύριος ὁ θεὸς ὁ παντοκράτωρ ὄνομα αὐτῷ LXX

Is there a reason why the Luke changed the word «Δαμασκοῦ» (“Damascus”) in Amos 5:27 to «Βαβυλῶνος» (“Babylon”) in Acts 5:43?

7

The general suggestion I have seen for this change is that Stephen (or the author of Acts) has conflated Assyria's conquest of Israel in 722 BC with Babylon's conquest of Judah in 587 BC, effectively summarizing the whole concept of 'exile', and even to highlight the AD 70 destruction of Jerusalem's second temple (similar to what the Babylonians had done).

So Mikael Parsons, Acts, page 100:

Here Luke paraphrases his source, Amos, from "beyond Damascus" to "beyond Babylon" to summarize the history of Israel from the wilderness wanderings to the exile as one of idolatry.

And, more helpfully, F. Scott Spencer, The Gospel of Luke and Acts of the Apostles, page 76:

"Babylon" appears only once in Luke's narratives, but this reference betrays Luke's editorial hand and comes at a strategic point in the story. The long review of Israel's past in Acts 7 includes a citation from Amos 5:25-27, recalling the nation's forty years of wilderness wandering and later exile to a foreign land (Acts 7:42-43). However, otherwise sticking close to his Septuagint source, Luke changes Amos' original destination from "beyond Damascus" to "beyond Babylon," thereby evoking memory of the temple's destruction and the Babylonian exile. By incorporating this into Stephen's speech (7:2-55), where he responds to charges of speaking against "this holy place" (temple) and predicting its demolition (6:13-14), Luke draws a subtle link between the Babylonian and Roman assaults on the Jerusalem temple in the sixth century B.C.E. and first century C.E., respectively.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.