In the beginnynge was the worde and the worde was with God: and the worde was God.
John 1:1 (Tyndale Bible 1534 by William Tyndale)
Why did Tyndale (1525) did not capitalize 'word' in John 1:1?
Biblical Hermeneutics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professors, theologians, and those interested in exegetical analysis of biblical texts. It only takes a minute to sign up.Sign up to join this community
I expect a lot depended on the printer. Here are two early printings. In each, notice that not only is "worde" not capitalized, but neither is "god".
This one is the first of Tyndale's New Testaments (later revised): the 1525 printing from Cologne:
And this is John 1 from the 1526 Peter Schoeffer printing which similarly set in uppercase the first words of sentences, and few others:
We would not know why he did. But seeing that 'god' and 'word' we see the significant change in the sense of the words when they are capitalized. A few recent ones (REV; Nazarene Commentary) have it as 'word'.
Another example in the similar line is 'holy spirit'. NWT do not capitalize it and, in addition, accurately renders it either as 'holy spirit' or 'the holy spirit', whereas most others have them only as 'the holy spirit'. This may be in support of their own Trinitarian pneumatology, but as far as translation goes, it is grossly inaccurate. FYI, check for IRENT (a new translation of NT) - at http://tiny.cc/bostonreaders
If the bible interprets the bible then the proper understanding of John 1 would be found in Issaih 55 The father says "I will send out my word and it shall not come back empty" I, the father "singular" my word "His singular" "and it" not he, or she! By the breath of my mouth (His words) he spoke and it came in to existence Ps.33:5-6 There is nothing complicated about this!