How did the author of Ecclesiastes understand life after death and man's relationship to eternity? What passages in the book address or allude to this topic?

Inspired by a reading of Ecclesiastes 3:19-22.


4 Answers 4


There does seem to be some confusion early on:

Ecclesiastes 3:21 (NASB)
Who knows that the breath of man ascends upward and the breath of the beast descends downward to the earth?

Later, though, we see that the author of Ecclesiastes believes in the place called "Sheol"

Ecclesiastes 9:10 (NASB)
Whatever your hand finds to do, do it with all your might; for there is no activity or planning or knowledge or wisdom in Sheol where you are going.

He describes this in 9:5-6:

Ecclesiastes 9:5-6 (NASB)
5 For the living know they will die; but the dead do not know anything, nor have they any longer a reward, for their memory is forgotten. 6 Indeed their love, their hate and their zeal have already perished, and they will no longer have a share in all that is done under the sun.

Sheol is often translated as "the grave", but that translation is questionable.

Professors James Tabor believe that Sheol is a place of nothingness that occurs after death, where both the righteous and unrighteous go.

The ancient Hebrews had no idea of an immortal soul living a full and vital life beyond death, nor of any resurrection or return from death. Human beings, like the beasts of the field, are made of "dust of the earth," and at death they return to that dust (Gen. 2:7; 3:19).
What the Bible says about Death, Afterlife, and the Future, James Tabor

This idea is supported from passages in Job, Psalms and Genesis.

The idea that existed back then (when Ecclesiastes was written) is that Sheol is essentially a place of nothingness, a shade of an existence where there is no memory and no reward.


One of the themes of Ecclesiastes is the ignorance of the 'Preacher' and his intended audience, especially when it comes to the future, eg in chapter 2:

18Thus I hated all the fruit of my labor for which I had labored under the sun, for I must leave it to the man who will come after me. 19And who knows whether he will be a wise man or a fool? Yet he will have control over all the fruit of my labor for which I have labored by acting wisely under the sun. This too is vanity. NASB

and chapter 11:

1Cast your bread on the surface of the waters, for you will find it after many days. 2Divide your portion to seven, or even to eight, for you do not know what misfortune may occur on the earth. 3If the clouds are full, they pour out rain upon the earth; and whether a tree falls toward the south or toward the north, wherever the tree falls, there it lies. 4He who watches the wind will not sow and he who looks at the clouds will not reap. 5Just as you do not know the path of the wind and how bones are formed in the womb of the pregnant woman, so you do not know the activity of God who makes all things.

6Sow your seed in the morning and do not be idle in the evening, for you do not know whether morning or evening sowing will succeed, or whether both of them alike will be good. NASB

And it seems clear that while the author understands that we have an eternal home (at least by chapter 12), the nature of that home is something he knows very little about:

5Furthermore, men are afraid of a high place and of terrors on the road; the almond tree blossoms, the grasshopper drags himself along, and the caperberry is ineffective. For man goes to his eternal home while mourners go about in the street. NASB

He does, however, understand that God will judge all, and concludes God is to be feared regardless. In the context of the rest of the book, which refers overwhelmingly to a lack of justice in this life, he must be referring to justice after death:

12:13The conclusion, when all has been heard, is: fear God and keep His commandments, because this applies to every person. 14For God will bring every act to judgment, everything which is hidden, whether it is good or evil. NASB

Quotations are Copyright The Lockman Foundation


The author's view seems to be that humans are just animals and we all breathe the same air as they do. We accept that animals live and die with no expectation of justice or afterlife. So in light of that fate we should seize the day and gather rosebuds while we may:

[Ecc 3:12-13 NLT] (12) So I concluded there is nothing better than to be happy and enjoy ourselves as long as we can. (13) And people should eat and drink and enjoy the fruits of their labor, for these are gifts from God.

Paul alludes to the rationality of this conclusion if there is no resurrection of the dead:

[1Co 15:32 NLT] (32) And what value was there in fighting wild beasts--those people of Ephesus--if there will be no resurrection from the dead? And if there is no resurrection, "Let's feast and drink, for tomorrow we die!"


To answer this you need to first look at the question the author was seeking to answer, "What do you gain from all your hard work under the sun?" Ecclesiastes is first and foremost a theology of work and thus the majority of his reflections speak to that question first. When he says to put your best effort into whatever your hand finds to do it is on the basis that you will eventually die and will not have the opportunity to participate again in activity on this side of the grave. As he looks at various aspects of our life and work under the sun he does note, however, in various places that this is not the end of the matter. In regards to oppression and evil he says that God will one day judge both the righteous and the wicked for there will also be a time to evaluate every activity and a time to judge every deed (this is actually the end of the time poem that we often think just ends with a time for war). At the end of the book he affirms that our bodies will return to the dust but our spirit will return to God who gave it. Although his theme question is what do we gain on this earth for our heard work, he does not leave the afterlife completely out of the discussion.

  • I think the question that Ecclesiastes is examining answer is not about what you gain from your hard work, but about the meaning of life as is seen in the conclusion "Having heard everything, I have reached this conclusion: Fear God and keep his commandments, because this is the whole duty of man." (Chapt 12) The author concludes that this is the meaning of life. The author starts with this question to get at his point that the thing which we do most every day - work - is meaningless. This is not the purpose of or meaning to our life, therefore Ecclesiastes isn't really a theology of work. Feb 2, 2016 at 1:21

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.